- 09 May, 2007 40 commits
-
-
Adrian Bunk authored
nfs4_acl_add_ace() can now be removed. Signed-off-by:
Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Acked-by:
Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au> Acked-by:
J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Thanks to Jarek Poplawski for the ideas and for spotting the bug in the initial draft patch. cancel_rearming_delayed_work() currently has many limitations, because it requires that dwork always re-arms itself via queue_delayed_work(). So it hangs forever if dwork doesn't do this, or cancel_rearming_delayed_work/ cancel_delayed_work was already called. It uses flush_workqueue() in a loop, so it can't be used if workqueue was freezed, and it is potentially live- lockable on busy system if delay is small. With this patch cancel_rearming_delayed_work() doesn't make any assumptions about dwork, it can re-arm itself via queue_delayed_work(), or queue_work(), or do nothing. As a "side effect", cancel_work_sync() was changed to handle re-arming works as well. Disadvantages: - this patch adds wmb() to insert_work(). - slowdowns the fast path (when del_timer() succeeds on entry) of cancel_rearming_delayed_work(), because wait_on_work() is called unconditionally. In that case, compared to the old version, we are doing "unneeded" lock/unlock for each online CPU. On the other hand, this means we don't need to use cancel_work_sync() after cancel_rearming_delayed_work(). - complicates the code (.text grows by 130 bytes). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix speling] Signed-off-by:
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Gautham Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Acked-by:
Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Gautham R Shenoy authored
We are anyway kthread_stop()ping other per-cpu kernel threads after move_task_off_dead_cpu(), so we can do it with the stop_machine_run thread as well. I just checked with Vatsa if there was any subtle reason why they had put in the kthread_bind() in cpu.c. Vatsa cannot seem to recollect any and I can't see any. So let us just remove the kthread_bind. Signed-off-by:
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Currently kernel threads use sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK) to protect against signals. This doesn't prevent the signal delivery, this only blocks signal_wake_up(). Every "killall -33 kthreadd" means a "struct siginfo" leak. Change kthreadd_setup() to set all handlers to SIG_IGN instead of blocking them (make a new helper ignore_signals() for that). If the kernel thread needs some signal, it should use allow_signal() anyway, and in that case it should not use CLONE_SIGHAND. Note that we can't change daemonize() (should die!) in the same way, because it can be used along with CLONE_SIGHAND. This means that allow_signal() still should unblock the signal to work correctly with daemonize()ed threads. However, disallow_signal() doesn't block the signal any longer but ignores it. NOTE: with or without this patch the kernel threads are not protected from handle_stop_signal(), this seems harmless, but not good. Signed-off-by:
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
worker_thread() inherits ignored SIGCHLD and numa_default_policy() from its parent, kthreadd. No need to setup this again. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
allow_signal(SIGCHLD) does all necessary job, no need to call do_sigaction() prior to. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
usbatm_do_heavy_init() calls allow_signal() which plays with parent process's ->sighand. Signed-off-by:
Duncan Sands <duncan.sands@free.fr> Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Eric W. Biederman authored
When a kernel thread calls daemonize, instead of reparenting the thread to init reparent the thread to kthreadd next to the threads created by kthread_create. This is really just a stop gap until daemonize goes away, but it does ensure no kernel threads are under init and they are all in one place that is easy to find. Signed-off-by:
-
Eric W. Biederman authored
Currently there is a circular reference between work queue initialization and kthread initialization. This prevents the kthread infrastructure from initializing until after work queues have been initialized. We want the properties of tasks created with kthread_create to be as close as possible to the init_task and to not be contaminated by user processes. The later we start our kthreadd that creates these tasks the harder it is to avoid contamination from user processes and the more of a mess we have to clean up because the defaults have changed on us. So this patch modifies the kthread support to not use work queues but to instead use a simple list of structures, and to have kthreadd start from init_task immediately after our kernel thread that execs /sbin/init. By being a true child of init_task we only have to change those process settings that we want to have different from init_task, such as our process name, the cpus that are allowed, blocking all signals and setting SIGCHLD to SIG_IGN so that all of our children are reaped automatically. By being a true child of init_task we also naturally get our ppid set to 0 and do not wind up as a child of PID == 1. Ensuring that tasks generated by kthread_create will not slow down the functioning of the wait family of functions. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use interruptible sleeps] Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
____call_usermodehelper() has no reason for flush_signals(). It is a fresh forked process which is going to exec a user-space application or exit on failure. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
flush_work(wq, work) doesn't need the first parameter, we can use cwq->wq (this was possible from the very beginnig, I missed this). So we can unify flush_work_keventd and flush_work. Also, rename flush_work() to cancel_work_sync() and fix all callers. Perhaps this is not the best name, but "flush_work" is really bad. (akpm: this is why the earlier patches bypassed maintainers) Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Lameter authored
Shutdown the cache_reaper if the cpu is brought down and set the cache_reap.func to NULL. Otherwise hotplug shuts down the reaper for good. Signed-off-by:
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
We already depend on fact that all sub-threads have ->exit_signal == -1, no need to set it in zap_other_threads(). Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
worker_thread() can miss freeze_process()->signal_wake_up() if it happens between try_to_freeze() and prepare_to_wait(). We should check freezing() before entering schedule(). This race was introduced by me in [PATCH 1/1] workqueue: don't migrate pending works from the dead CPU Looks like mm/vmscan.c:kswapd() has the same race. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
worker_thread() doesn't need to "Block and flush all signals", this was already done by its caller, kthread(). Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
We don't have any users, and it is not so trivial to use NOAUTOREL works correctly. It is better to simplify API. Delete NOAUTOREL support and rename work_release to work_clear_pending to avoid a confusion. Signed-off-by:
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
net/ipv4/ipvs/ip_vs_core.c module_exit ip_vs_cleanup ip_vs_control_cleanup cancel_rearming_delayed_work // done This is unsafe. The module may be unloaded and the memory may be freed while defense_work's handler is still running/preempted. Do flush_work(&defense_work.work) after cancel_rearming_delayed_work(). Alternatively, we could add flush_work() to cancel_rearming_delayed_work(), but note that we can't change cancel_delayed_work() in the same manner because it may be called from atomic context. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(wq, dwork) doesn't need the first parameter. We don't hang on un-queued dwork any longer, and work->data doesn't change its type. This means we can always figure out "wq" from dwork when it is needed. Remove this parameter, and rename the function to cancel_rearming_delayed_work(). Re-create an inline "obsolete" cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(wq) which just calls cancel_rearming_delayed_work(). Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Cleanup. A number of per_cpu_ptr(wq->cpu_wq, cpu) users have to check that cpu is valid for this wq. Make a simple helper. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Change queue_delayed_work() to use queue_delayed_work_on() to avoid the code duplication (saves 133 bytes). Q: queue_delayed_work() enqueues &dwork->work directly when delay == 0, why? [jirislaby@gmail.com: oops fix] Signed-off-by:
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Currently typeof(delayed_work->work.data) is "struct workqueue_struct" when the timer is pending "struct cpu_workqueue_struct" whe the work is queued This makes impossible to use flush_fork(delayed_work->work) in addition to cancel_delayed_work/cancel_rearming_delayed_work, not good. Change queue_delayed_work/delayed_work_timer_fn to use cwq, not wq. This complicates (and uglifies) these functions a little bit, but alows us to use flush_fork(dwork) and imho makes the whole code more consistent. Also, document the fact that cancel_rearming_delayed_work() doesn't garantee the completion of work->func() upon return. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
CPU_UP_PREPARE binds cwq->thread to the new CPU. So CPU_UP_CANCELED tries to wake up the task which is bound to the failed CPU. With this patch we don't bind cwq->thread until CPU becomes online. The first wake_up() after kthread_create() is a bit special, make a simple helper for that. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
The only caller of init_workqueues() is do_basic_setup(). Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Add explicit workqueue_struct->singlethread flag. This lessens .text a little, but most importantly this allows us to manipulate wq->list without changine the meaning of is_single_threaded(). Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
The code like if (is_single_threaded(wq)) do_something(singlethread_cpu); else { for_each_cpu_mask(cpu, cpu_populated_map) do_something(cpu); } looks very annoying. We can add "static cpumask_t cpu_singlethread_map" and simplify the code. Lessens .text a bit, and imho makes the code more readable. Signed-off-by: -
Oleg Nesterov authored
cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue(dwork) will hang forever if dwork was not scheduled, because in that case cancel_delayed_work()->del_timer_sync() never returns true. I don't know if there are any callers which may have problems, but this is not so convenient, and the fix is very simple. Q: looks like we don't need "struct workqueue_struct *wq" parameter. If the timer was aborted successfully, get_wq_data() == wq. Is it worth to add the new function? Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
work->func() may sleep, it's a bug to call run_workqueue() with irqs disabled. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Because it has no callers. Actually, I think the whole idea of run_scheduled_work() was not right, not good to mix "unqueue this work and execute its ->func()" in one function. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Currently CPU_DEAD uses kthread_stop() to stop cwq->thread and then transfers cwq->worklist to another CPU. However, it is very unlikely that worker_thread() will notice kthread_should_stop() before flushing cwq->worklist. It is only possible if worker_thread() was preempted after run_workqueue(cwq), a new work_struct was added, and CPU_DEAD happened before cwq->thread has a chance to run. This means that take_over_work() mostly adds unneeded complications. Note also that kthread_stop() is not good per se, wake_up_process() may confuse work->func() if it sleeps waiting for some event. Remove take_over_work() and migrate_sequence complications. CPU_DEAD sets the cwq->should_stop flag (introduced by this patch) and waits for cwq->thread to flush cwq->worklist and exit. Because the dead CPU is not on cpu_online_map, no more works can be added to that cwq. cpu_populated_map was introduced to optimize for_each_possible_cpu(), it is not strictly needed, and it is more a documentation in fact. Saves 418 bytes. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Pointed out by Srivatsa Vaddagiri. cleanup_workqueue_thread() sets cwq->thread = NULL and does kthread_stop(). This breaks the "if (cwq->thread == current)" logic in flush_cpu_workqueue() and leads to deadlock. Kill the thead first, then clear cwq->thread. workqueue_mutex protects us from create_workqueue_thread() so we don't need cwq->lock. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Many thanks to Srivatsa Vaddagiri for the helpful discussion and for spotting the bug in my previous attempt. work->func() (and thus flush_workqueue()) must not use workqueue_mutex, this leads to deadlock when CPU_DEAD does kthread_stop(). However without this mutex held we can't detect CPU_DEAD in progress, which can move pending works to another CPU while the dead one is not on cpu_online_map. Change flush_workqueue() to use for_each_possible_cpu(). This means that flush_cpu_workqueue() may hit CPU which is already dead. However in that case !list_empty(&cwq->worklist) || cwq->current_work != NULL means that CPU_DEAD in progress, it will do kthread_stop() + take_over_work() so we can proceed and insert a barrier. We hold cwq->lock, so we are safe. Also, add migrate_sequence incremented by take_over_work() under cwq->lock. If take_over_work() happened before we checked this CPU, we should see the new value after spin_unlock(). Further possible changes: remove CPU_DEAD handling (along with take_over_work, migrate_sequence) from workqueue.c. CPU_DEAD just sets cwq->please_exit_after_flush flag. CPU_UP_PREPARE->create_workqueue_thread() clears this flag, and creates the new thread if cwq->thread == NULL. This way the workqueue/cpu-hotplug interaction is almost zero, workqueue_mutex just protects "workqueues" list, CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE/CPU_LOCK_RELEASE go away. Signed-off-by:
-
Oleg Nesterov authored
Currently ->freezeable is per-cpu, this is wrong. CPU_UP_PREPARE creates cwq->thread which is not freezeable. Move ->freezeable to workqueue_struct. Signed-off-by:
-
Heiko Carstens authored
Looks like this was forgotten when CPU_LOCK_[ACQUIRE|RELEASE] was introduced. Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com> Cc: Gautham Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Signed-off-by:
-
Heiko Carstens authored
This makes cpu hotplug symmetrical: if CPU_UP_PREPARE fails we get CPU_UP_CANCELED, so we can undo what ever happened on PREPARE. The same should happen for CPU_DOWN_PREPARE. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix for reduce-size-of-task_struct-on-64-bit-machines] Cc: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com> Cc: Gautham Shenoy <ego@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Gautham R Shenoy authored
Eliminate lock_cpu_hotplug from kernel/sched.c and use sched_hotcpu_mutex instead to postpone a hotplug event. In the migration_call hotcpu callback function, take sched_hotcpu_mutex while handling the event CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and release it while handling CPU_LOCK_RELEASE event. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix deadlock] Signed-off-by:
-
Gautham R Shenoy authored
This is an attempt to provide an alternate mechanism for postponing a hotplug event instead of using a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug. The proposal is to add two new events namely CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE. The notification for these two events would be sent out before and after a cpu_hotplug event respectively. During the CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE event, a cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to acquire any per-subsystem hotcpu mutex ( Eg. workqueue_mutex in kernel/workqueue.c ). During the CPU_LOCK_RELEASE release event the cpu-hotplug-aware subsystem is supposed to release the per-subsystem hotcpu mutex. The reasons for defining new events as opposed to reusing the existing events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_UP_FAILED/CPU_ONLINE for locking/unlocking of per-subsystem hotcpu mutexes are as follow: - CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE: All hotcpu mutexes are taken before subsystems start handling pre-hotplug events like CPU_UP_PREPARE/CPU_DOWN_PREPARE etc, thus ensuring a clean handling of these events. - CPU_LOCK_RELEASE: The hotcpu mutexes will be released only after all subsystems have handled post-hotplug events like CPU_DOWN_FAILED, CPU_DEAD,CPU_ONLINE etc thereby ensuring that there are no subsequent clashes amongst the interdependent subsystems after a cpu hotplugs. This patch also uses __raw_notifier_call chain in _cpu_up to take care of the dependency between the two consequetive calls to raw_notifier_call_chain. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix a bug] Signed-off-by:
-
Gautham R Shenoy authored
Since 2.6.18-something, the community has been bugged by the problem to provide a clean and a stable mechanism to postpone a cpu-hotplug event as lock_cpu_hotplug was badly broken. This is another proposal towards solving that problem. This one is along the lines of the solution provided in kernel/workqueue.c Instead of having a global mechanism like lock_cpu_hotplug, we allow the subsytems to define their own per-subsystem hot cpu mutexes. These would be taken(released) where ever we are currently calling lock_cpu_hotplug(unlock_cpu_hotplug). Also, in the per-subsystem hotcpu callback function,we take this mutex before we handle any pre-cpu-hotplug events and release it once we finish handling the post-cpu-hotplug events. A standard means for doing this has been provided in [PATCH 2/4] and demonstrated in [PATCH 3/4]. The ordering of these per-subsystem mutexes might still prove to be a problem, but hopefully lockdep should help us get out of that muddle. The patch set to be applied against linux-2.6.19-rc5 is as follows: [PATCH 1/4] : Extend notifier_call_chain with an option to specify the number of notifications to be sent and also count the number of notifications actually sent. [PATCH 2/4] : Define events CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE and CPU_LOCK_RELEASE and send out notifications for these in _cpu_up and _cpu_down. This would help us standardise the acquire and release of the subsystem locks in the hotcpu callback functions of these subsystems. [PATCH 3/4] : Eliminate lock_cpu_hotplug from kernel/sched.c. [PATCH 4/4] : In workqueue_cpu_callback function, acquire(release) the workqueue_mutex while handling CPU_LOCK_ACQUIRE(CPU_LOCK_RELEASE). If the per-subsystem-locking approach survives the test of time, we can expect a slow phasing out of lock_cpu_hotplug, which has not yet been eliminated in these patches :) This patch: Provide notifier_call_chain with an option to call only a specified number of notifiers and also record the number of call to notifiers made. The need for this enhancement was identified in the post entitled "Slab - Eliminate lock_cpu_hotplug from slab" (http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/28/92) by Ravikiran G Thirumalai and Andrew Morton. This patch adds two additional parameters to notifier_call_chain API namely - int nr_to_calls : Number of notifier_functions to be called. The don't care value is -1. - unsigned int *nr_calls : Records the total number of notifier_funtions called by notifier_call_chain. The don't care value is NULL. [michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com: build fix] Credit: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by:
Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Tom Zanussi authored
relay doesn't need to use schedule_delayed_work() for waking readers when a simple timer will do. Signed-off-by:
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@comcast.net> Cc: Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Signed-off-by:
-
Andrew Morton authored
(akpm: bypassed maintainers, sorry. There are other patches which depend on this) Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Signed-off-by:
-
Andrew Morton authored
(akpm: bypassed maintainers, sorry. There are other patches which depend on this) Cc: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru> Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
