- 29 Mar, 2020 6 commits
-
-
Thomas Gleixner authored
Merge tag 'irqchip-5.7' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms into irq/core Pull irqchip updates from Marc Zyngier: - Second batch of the GICv4.1 support saga - Level triggered interrupt support for the stm32 controller - Versatile-fpga chained interrupt fixes - DT support for cascaded VIC interrupt controller - RPi irqchip initialization fixes - Multi-instance support for the Xilinx interrupt controller - Multi-instance support for the PLIC interrupt controller - CPU hotplug support for the PLIC interrupt controller - Ingenic X1000 TCU support - Small fixes all over the shop (GICv3, GICv4, Xilinx, Atmel, sa1111) - Cleanups (setup_irq removal, zero-length array removal)
-
afzal mohammed authored
request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq() occur after memory allocators are ready. setup_irq() was required in older kernels as the memory allocator was not available during early boot. Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq(). Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/82667ae23520611b2a9d8db77e1d8aeb982f08e5.1585320721.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
-
afzal mohammed authored
request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq() occur after memory allocators are ready. setup_irq() was required in older kernels as the memory allocator was not available during early boot. Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq(). Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/b060312689820559121ee0a6456bbc1202fb7ee5.1585320721.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
-
afzal mohammed authored
request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq() occur after memory allocators are ready. setup_irq() was required in older kernels as the memory allocator was not available during early boot. Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq(). Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/e84ac60de8f747d49ce082659e51595f708c29d4.1585320721.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
-
afzal mohammed authored
request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq() occur after memory allocators are ready. setup_irq() was required in older kernels as the memory allocator was not available during early boot. Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq(). Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/56e991e920ce5806771fab892574cba89a3d413f.1585320721.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
-
afzal mohammed authored
request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq() occur after memory allocators are ready. setup_irq() was required in older kernels as the memory allocator was not available during early boot. Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq(). Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/51f8ae7da9f47a23596388141933efa2bdef317b.1585320721.git.afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com
-
- 24 Mar, 2020 11 commits
-
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Now that we have HW-accelerated SGIs being delivered to VPEs, it becomes required to map the VPEs on all ITSs instead of relying on the lazy approach that we would use when using the ITS-list mechanism. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-17-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Add the SGI configuration entry point for KVM to use. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-16-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Allocate per-VPE SGIs when initializing the GIC-specific part of the VPE data structure. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-15-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
In order to hide some of the differences between v4.0 and v4.1, move the doorbell management out of the KVM code, and into the GICv4-specific layer. This allows the calling code to ask for the doorbell when blocking, and otherwise to leave the doorbell permanently disabled. This matches the v4.1 code perfectly, and only results in a minor refactoring of the v4.0 code. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-14-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Just like for vLPIs, there is some configuration information that cannot be directly communicated through the normal irqchip API, and we have to use our good old friend set_vcpu_affinity as a side-band communication mechanism. This is used to configure group and priority for a given vSGI. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-13-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
To implement the get/set_irqchip_state callbacks (limited to the PENDING state), we have to use a particular set of hacks: - Reading the pending state is done by using a pair of new redistributor registers (GICR_VSGIR, GICR_VSGIPENDR), which allow the 16 interrupts state to be retrieved. - Setting the pending state is done by generating it as we'd otherwise do for a guest (writing to GITS_SGIR). - Clearing the pending state is done by emitting a VSGI command with the "clear" bit set. This requires some interesting locking though: - When talking to the redistributor, we must make sure that the VPE affinity doesn't change, hence taking the VPE lock. - At the same time, we must ensure that nobody accesses the same redistributor's GICR_VSGIR registers for a different VPE, which would corrupt the reading of the pending bits. We thus take the per-RD spinlock. Much fun. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-12-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Implement mask/unmask for virtual SGIs by calling into the configuration helper. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-11-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
The GICv4.1 ITS has yet another new command (VSGI) which allows a VPE-targeted SGI to be configured (or have its pending state cleared). Add support for this command and plumb it into the activate irqdomain callback so that it is ready to be used. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-10-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Since GICv4.1 has the capability to inject 16 SGIs into each VPE, and that I'm keen not to invent too many specific interfaces to manipulate these interrupts, let's pretend that each of these SGIs is an actual Linux interrupt. For that matter, let's introduce a minimal irqchip and irqdomain setup that will get fleshed up in the following patches. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-9-maz@kernel.org
-
Marek Vasut authored
Sampling the IRQ line state in EOI and retriggering the interrupt to work around missing level-triggered interrupt support only works for non-threaded interrupts. Threaded interrupts must be retriggered the same way in unmask callback. Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de> [maz: fixed missing static attribute] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200323235132.530550-1-marex@denx.de
-
- 22 Mar, 2020 9 commits
-
-
luanshi authored
irq_domain_update_bus_token should be called after checking for NULL domain. Signed-off-by: Liguang Zhang <zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1583983255-44115-1-git-send-email-zhangliguang@linux.alibaba.com
-
Mubin Sayyed authored
Using a default domain on DT based platforms is unnecessary. Signed-off-by: Mubin Sayyed <mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-5-mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com
-
Michal Simek authored
Register default arch handler via driver instead of directly pointing to xilinx intc controller. This patch makes architecture code more generic. Driver calls generic domain specific irq handler which does the most of things self. Also get rid of concurrent_irq counting which hasn't been exported anywhere. Based on this loop was also optimized by using do/while loop instead of goto loop. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@xilinx.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-4-mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com
-
Michal Simek authored
There is no ret filled in case of irq_domain_add_linear() failure. Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Stefan Asserhall <stefan.asserhall@xilinx.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-3-mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com
-
Mubin Sayyed authored
Added support for cascaded interrupt controllers. Following cascaded configurations have been tested, - peripheral->xilinx-intc->xilinx-intc->gic->Cortexa53 processor on zcu102 board - peripheral->xilinx-intc->xilinx-intc->microblaze processor on kcu105 board Signed-off-by: Mubin Sayyed <mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Anirudha Sarangi <anirudha.sarangi@xilinx.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200317125600.15913-2-mubin.usman.sayyed@xilinx.com
-
周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) authored
Enable TCU support for Ingenic X1000, which can be supported by the existing driver. Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1584456160-40060-3-git-send-email-zhouyanjie@wanyeetech.com
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319214531.GA21326@embeddedor.com
-
Gustavo A. R. Silva authored
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319214438.GA21123@embeddedor.com
-
Sungbo Eo authored
Clear its own IRQs before the parent IRQ get enabled, so that the remaining IRQs do not accidentally interrupt the parent IRQ controller. This patch also fixes a reboot bug on OX820 SoC, where the remaining rps-timer IRQ raises a GIC interrupt that is left pending. After that, the rps-timer IRQ is cleared during driver initialization, and there's no IRQ left in rps-irq when local_irq_enable() is called, which evokes an error message "unexpected IRQ trap". Fixes: bdd272cb ("irqchip: versatile FPGA: support cascaded interrupts from DT") Signed-off-by: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200321133842.2408823-1-mans0n@gorani.run
-
- 21 Mar, 2020 1 commit
-
-
Heyi Guo authored
There is no special reason to set virtual LPI pending table as non-shareable. If we choose to hard code the shareability without probing, Inner-Shareable is likely to be a better choice, as the VPEs can move around and benefit from having the redistributors snooping each other's cache, if that's something they can do. Furthermore, Hisilicon hip08 ends up with unspecified errors when mixing shareability attributes. So let's move to IS attributes for the VPT. This has also been tested on D05 and didn't show any regression. Signed-off-by: Heyi Guo <guoheyi@huawei.com> [maz: rewrote commit message] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191130073849.38378-1-guoheyi@huawei.com
-
- 20 Mar, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Marc Zyngier authored
One of the new features of GICv4.1 is to allow virtual SGIs to be directly signaled to a VPE. For that, the ITS has grown a new 64kB page containing only a single register that is used to signal a SGI to a given VPE. Add a second mapping covering this new 64kB range, and take this opportunity to limit the original mapping to 64kB, which is enough to cover the span of the ITS registers. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-8-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Tell KVM that we support v4.1. Nothing uses this information so far. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-7-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
The GICv4.1 spec says that it is CONTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE to write to any of the GICR_INV{LPI,ALL}R registers if GICR_SYNCR.Busy == 1. To deal with it, we must ensure that only a single invalidation can happen at a time for a given redistributor. Add a per-RD lock to that effect and take it around the invalidation/syncr-read to deal with this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-6-maz@kernel.org
-
Zenghui Yu authored
In GICv4.1, we emulate a guest-issued INVALL command by a direct write to GICR_INVALLR. Before we finish the emulation and go back to guest, let's make sure the physical invalidate operation is actually completed and no stale data will be left in redistributor. Per the specification, this can be achieved by polling the GICR_SYNCR.Busy bit (to zero). Signed-off-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200302092145.899-1-yuzenghui@huawei.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-5-maz@kernel.org
-
- 19 Mar, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Marc Zyngier authored
Before GICv4.1, all operations would be serialized with the affinity changes by virtue of using the same ITS command queue. With v4.1, things change, as invalidations (and a number of other operations) are issued using the redistributor MMIO frame. We must thus make sure that these redistributor accesses cannot race against aginst the affinity change, or we may end-up talking to the wrong redistributor. To ensure this, we expand the irq_to_cpuid() helper to take a spinlock when the LPI is mapped to a vLPI (a new per-VPE lock) on each operation that requires mutual exclusion. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-4-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
In a system that is only sparsly populated with CPUs, we can end-up with redistributors structures that are not initialized. Let's make sure we don't try and access those when iterating over them (in this case when checking we have a L2 VPE table). Fixes: 4e6437f1 ("irqchip/gic-v4.1: Ensure L2 vPE table is allocated at RD level") Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-3-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
To allow the direct injection of SGIs into a guest, the GICv4.1 architecture has to sacrifice the Active state so that SGIs look a lot like LPIs (they are injected by the same mechanism). In order not to break existing software, the architecture gives offers guests OSs the choice: SGIs with or without an active state. It is the hypervisors duty to honor the guest's choice. For this, the architecture offers a discovery bit indicating whether the GIC supports GICv4.1 SGIs (GICD_TYPER2.nASSGIcap), and another bit indicating whether the guest wants Active-less SGIs or not (controlled by GICD_CTLR.nASSGIreq). A hypervisor not supporting GICv4.1 SGIs would leave nASSGIcap clear, and a guest not knowing about GICv4.1 SGIs (or definitely wanting an Active state) would leave nASSGIreq clear (both being thankfully backward compatible with older revisions of the GIC). Since Linux is perfectly happy without an active state on SGIs, inform the hypervisor that we'll use that if offered. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200304203330.4967-2-maz@kernel.org
-
Sungbo Eo authored
Enclose the chained handler with chained_irq_{enter,exit}(), so that the muxed interrupts get properly acked. This patch also fixes a reboot bug on OX820 SoC, where the jiffies timer interrupt is never acked. The kernel waits a clock tick forever in calibrate_delay_converge(), which leads to a boot hang. Fixes: c41b16f8 ("ARM: integrator/versatile: consolidate FPGA IRQ handling code") Signed-off-by: Sungbo Eo <mans0n@gorani.run> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200319023448.1479701-1-mans0n@gorani.run
-
- 16 Mar, 2020 5 commits
-
-
Marc Zyngier authored
On a very heavily loaded D05 with GICv4, I managed to trigger the following lockdep splat: [ 6022.598864] ====================================================== [ 6022.605031] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 6022.611200] 5.6.0-rc4-00026-geee7c7b0f498 #680 Tainted: G E [ 6022.618061] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 6022.624227] qemu-system-aar/7569 is trying to acquire lock: [ 6022.629789] ffff042f97606808 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}, at: try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.637102] [ 6022.637102] but task is already holding lock: [ 6022.642921] ffff002fae424cf0 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}, at: __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.651350] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 6022.651350] [ 6022.659512] [ 6022.659512] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 6022.666980] [ 6022.666980] -> #2 (&irq_desc_lock_class){-.-.}: [ 6022.672983] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.677848] __irq_get_desc_lock+0x5c/0x98 [ 6022.682453] irq_set_vcpu_affinity+0x40/0xc0 [ 6022.687236] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0x6c/0xb8 [ 6022.692364] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.696273] vgic_v3_put+0x20/0xd8 [ 6022.700183] kvm_vgic_put+0x30/0x48 [ 6022.704182] kvm_arch_vcpu_put+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.708614] kvm_sched_out+0x34/0x50 [ 6022.712700] __schedule+0x4bc/0x7f8 [ 6022.716697] schedule+0x50/0xd8 [ 6022.720347] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x5f0/0x978 [ 6022.725473] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.729820] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.733642] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.738074] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.743373] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.747198] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.750761] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.755278] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.759100] [ 6022.759100] -> #1 (&rq->lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.764143] _raw_spin_lock+0x38/0x50 [ 6022.768314] task_fork_fair+0x40/0x128 [ 6022.772572] sched_fork+0xe0/0x210 [ 6022.776484] copy_process+0x8c4/0x18d8 [ 6022.780742] _do_fork+0x88/0x6d8 [ 6022.784478] kernel_thread+0x64/0x88 [ 6022.788563] rest_init+0x30/0x270 [ 6022.792390] arch_call_rest_init+0x14/0x1c [ 6022.796995] start_kernel+0x498/0x4c4 [ 6022.801164] [ 6022.801164] -> #0 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}: [ 6022.806382] __lock_acquire+0xdd8/0x15c8 [ 6022.810813] lock_acquire+0xd0/0x218 [ 6022.814896] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x78 [ 6022.819761] try_to_wake_up+0x54/0x7a0 [ 6022.824018] wake_up_process+0x1c/0x28 [ 6022.828276] wakeup_softirqd+0x38/0x40 [ 6022.832533] __tasklet_schedule_common+0xc4/0xf0 [ 6022.837658] __tasklet_schedule+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.842176] check_irq_resend+0xc8/0x158 [ 6022.846609] irq_startup+0x74/0x128 [ 6022.850606] __enable_irq+0x6c/0x78 [ 6022.854602] enable_irq+0x54/0xa0 [ 6022.858431] its_make_vpe_non_resident+0xa4/0xb8 [ 6022.863557] vgic_v4_put+0x54/0x70 [ 6022.867469] kvm_arch_vcpu_blocking+0x28/0x38 [ 6022.872336] kvm_vcpu_block+0x48/0x490 [ 6022.876594] kvm_handle_wfx+0x18c/0x310 [ 6022.880938] handle_exit+0x138/0x198 [ 6022.885022] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x4d4/0x978 [ 6022.890148] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x3d4/0x8f8 [ 6022.894494] ksys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0 [ 6022.898317] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x24/0x30 [ 6022.902748] el0_svc_common.constprop.3+0xa8/0x1e8 [ 6022.908046] do_el0_svc+0x28/0x88 [ 6022.911871] el0_svc+0x14/0x40 [ 6022.915434] el0_sync_handler+0x124/0x2b8 [ 6022.919951] el0_sync+0x140/0x180 [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.923773] other info that might help us debug this: [ 6022.923773] [ 6022.931762] Chain exists of: [ 6022.931762] &p->pi_lock --> &rq->lock --> &irq_desc_lock_class [ 6022.931762] [ 6022.942101] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 6022.942101] [ 6022.948007] CPU0 CPU1 [ 6022.952523] ---- ---- [ 6022.957039] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.961036] lock(&rq->lock); [ 6022.966595] lock(&irq_desc_lock_class); [ 6022.973109] lock(&p->pi_lock); [ 6022.976324] [ 6022.976324] *** DEADLOCK *** This is happening because we have a pending doorbell that requires retrigger. As SW retriggering is done in a tasklet, we trigger the circular dependency above. The easy cop-out is to provide a retrigger callback that doesn't require acquiring any extra lock. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-5-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
The irq_retrigger callback is supposed to return 0 when retrigger has failed, and a non-zero value otherwise. Tell the core code that the driver has succedded in using the HW to retrigger the interrupt (if ever). Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-4-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
The irq_retrigger callback is supposed to return 0 when retrigger has failed, and a non-zero value otherwise. Tell the core code that the driver has succedded in using the HW to retrigger the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-3-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
The irq_retrigger callback is supposed to return 0 when retrigger has failed, and a non-zero value otherwise. Tell the core code that the driver has succedded in using the HW to retrigger the interrupt. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310184921.23552-2-maz@kernel.org
-
Marc Zyngier authored
The GICv3 ITS driver assumes that once it has latched on a page size for a given BASER register, it can use the same page size as the maximum page size for all subsequent BASER registers. Although it worked so far, nothing in the architecture guarantees this, and Nianyao Tang hit this problem on some undisclosed implementation. Let's bite the bullet and probe the the supported page size on all BASER registers before starting to populate the tables. This simplifies the setup a bit, at the expense of a few additional MMIO accesses. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> Reported-by: Nianyao Tang <tangnianyao@huawei.com> Tested-by: Nianyao Tang <tangnianyao@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1584089195-63897-1-git-send-email-zhangshaokun@hisilicon.com
-