- 30 Jun, 2016 27 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-26-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-25-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-24-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-23-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-22-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-21-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-20-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-19-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-18-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-17-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-16-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-14-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-13-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-12-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-11-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-10-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-9-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-8-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-7-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
By using the out-of-line intel_wait_for_register() not only do we can efficiency from using the hybrid wait_for() contained within, but we avoid code bloat from the numerous inlined loops, in total (all patches): text data bss dec hex filename 1078551 4557 416 1083524 108884 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko 1070775 4557 416 1075748 106a24 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
We want to replace the inline wait_for() with an out-of-line hybrid busy/sleep wait_for() in the hopes of speeding up the communication wit the PCode unit. Indeed, on my i5-2500s, __gen6_update_ring_freq improves from 6,080,661ns to 8172ns. v2: Missed using _fw variants for sandybridge_pcode_read() Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
Ville Syrjälä reported that in the majority of wait_for(I915_READ()) he inspect, most completed within the first couple of reads and that the delay between those wait_for() reads was the ratelimiting step for many code paths. For example, __gen6_update_ring_freq() was blamed for slowing down boot by many milliseconds, but under Ville's scrutiny the issue was just excessive delay waiting for sandybridge_pcode_write(). We can eliminate the wait by initially using a busyspin upon the register read and only fallback to the sleeping loop in cases where the hardware is indeed too slow. A threshold of 2 microseconds is used as the initial ballpark. To avoid excessive code bloating from converting every wait_for() into a hybrid busy/sleep loop, we extend wait_for_register_fw() and export it for use by other callers. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467297225-21379-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
This reverts commit ee042aa4. Something appears to be off in the timing, but as far as I can tell it is not along the event delivery path. The net effect appears to be rendering flicker (the current render buffer appears on the scanout, with what appears to be active rendering for a fraction of a frame) and is causing me a headache. The cursor is also being stalled by page flips, causing a "heavy mouse" and jitter. Daniel Stone did find what appears to the cause of the tearing, in https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2016-June/099466.html That is the parameter passed to intel_atomic_commit_tail is the old_state but we need the new_state to wait upon. That leaves the question of how the CRC based tests didn't spot the error (how can we improve our tests?), the issue of legacy cursor stalling flips, and the issue of flips stalling the cursor. For the moment, step back until the condundrum of new/old state is reviewed along with more tests! Reported-and-tested-by: Steven Newbury <steve@snewbury.org.uk> Reported-by: Rafael Ristovski <rafael.ristovski@gmail.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96593 Testcase: igt/kms_cursor_legacy/basic-cursor-vs-flip Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466772243-21879-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukAcked-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
-
- 29 Jun, 2016 6 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Since commit 2ed53a94 ("drm/i915: On GPU reset, set the HWS breadcrumb to the last seqno") once a hang is completed, the seqno is advanced past all current requests. With this we know that if we wake up from waiting for a request, if a hang has occurred and reset completed, our request will be considered complete (i.e. i915_gem_request_completed() returns true). Therefore we only need to worry about the situation where a hang has occurred, but not yet reset, where we may need to release our struct_mutex. Since we don't need to detect the completed reset using the global gpu_error->reset_counter anymore, we do not need to track the reset_counter epoch inside the request. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467211874-11552-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: Arun Siluvery <arun.siluvery@linux.intel.com>
-
Tvrtko Ursulin authored
usleep_range is not recommended for waits shorten than 10us. Make the wait_for_us use the atomic variant for such waits. To do so we need to reimplement the _wait_for_atomic macro to be safe with regards to preemption and interrupts. v2: Reimplement _wait_for_atomic to be irq and preemption safe. (Chris Wilson and Imre Deak) v3: Fixed in_atomic check due rebase error. v4: Build bug on non-constant timeouts. v5: Compile away cpu migration code in atomic paths. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467114710-29989-1-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
-
Tvrtko Ursulin authored
Required to enable correct wait_for_atomic checks. Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
Jani Nikula authored
Most notably eDP, DSI, and TV. Add MISSING_CASE handling so we won't miss this in the future. Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/5773794027ea0d699052a343491b52343ba30504.1465810007.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
Jani Nikula authored
No functional changes. Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ef19172e5a00d8abd8190a5389283ef6b5f7eaa9.1465810007.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
Jani Nikula authored
It's easier to read the code when the macro names match the spec. Also add a bunch of missing ones. No functional changes. Reviewed-and-tested-by: Peter Wu <peter@lekensteyn.nl> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7cfdd2733b8cc7abae43cfa8c81aed902b69ecd5.1465810007.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 28 Jun, 2016 7 commits
-
-
Rodrigo Vivi authored
This is unusual. Usually IDs listed on early stages of platform definition are kept there as reserved for later use. However these IDs here are not listed anymore in any of steppings and devices IDs tables for Kabylake on configurations overview section of BSpec. So it is better removing them before they become used in any other future platform. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466718636-19675-2-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
Rodrigo Vivi authored
The spec has been updated adding new PCI IDs. Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1466718636-19675-1-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
Imre Deak authored
Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by using the non-atomic wait_for instead. Due to the relatively long 10ms timeout, probably this didn't cause any real problems, but fix it in any case for consistency. Fixes: 0351b939 ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity") CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-5-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
Imre Deak authored
Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by using the non-atomic wait_for instead. Fixes: 0351b939 ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity") CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-4-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
Imre Deak authored
Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by using the non-atomic wait_for instead. Fixes: 0351b939 ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity") CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-3-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
Imre Deak authored
Since wait_for_atomic doesn't re-check the wait-for condition after expiry of the timeout it can fail when called from non-atomic context even if the condition is set correctly before the expiry. Fix this by using the non-atomic wait_for instead. I noticed this via the PLL locking timing out incorrectly, with this fix I couldn't reproduce the problem. Fixes: 0351b939 ("drm/i915: Do not lie about atomic timeout granularity") CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> CC: drm-intel-fixes@lists.freedesktop.org Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467110253-16046-2-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
-
Matt Roper authored
When a display update triggers a DDB re-allocation, we should start by assuming that only the updated pipes need to be re-allocated (we have logic later that may add additional pipes if, e.g., a modeset triggers a change to the global allocation). We were erroneously using the _active_ pipes as our starting point rather than the changed pipes. This causes us to grab CRTC locks that we didn't actually need, reducing parallelism. Given the recent non-blocking atomic changes, it also causes legacy pageflips against one CRTC to return -EBUSY if there's an outstanding pageflip against a different CRTC (a situation easily triggered via compositors like Weston). Fixes: 98d39494 ("drm/i915/gen9: Compute DDB allocation at atomic check time (v4)") Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467070964-14864-1-git-send-email-matthew.d.roper@intel.comReviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
-