- 21 Mar, 2012 40 commits
-
-
Matthew Garrett authored
Making an hfsplus partition bootable requires the ability to "bless" a file by putting its inode number in the volume header. Doing this from userspace on a mounted filesystem is impractical since the kernel will write back the original values on unmount. Add an ioctl to allow userspace to update the volume header information based on the target file. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Matthew Garrett authored
The finder_info block in the hfsplus volume header is currently defined as an array of 8 bit values, but TN1150 defines it as being an array of 32 bit values. Fix for convenience. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Matthew Garrett authored
The userflags field was being written to the filesystem without being initialised. Make sure it's clear, since otherwise files end up with garbage attributes. Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
checking if an extent is the one we are looking for is done twice in qnx4_block_map(); gather that code into a helper function. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
pointless, since the only caller will want the physical block number anyway; might as well call qnx4_block_map() and use sb_bread() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... while calling uml_dup_mmap() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
seriously, kmalloc() for two-element array of pointers? Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
really weirdly spelled "while the list is non-empty, pick its first element, remove it from the list and free it" kind of loop... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
... and make configfs_mnt static Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
no need to play sick games with parent item, internal mount, etc. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
just give root directory separate inode_operations without all those methods... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Just don't pass NULL to it - nobody does, anyway. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
it's not a serious race, but we really want misc device before anybody gets to mount this sucker. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
can check MS_KERNMOUNT in flags now Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
Al Viro authored
It should've been changed when queue_work() became queue_delayed_work(..., 0) in there. It's always had been about not needing a delay, not about not using specific function... Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-