- 25 May, 2020 40 commits
-
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
The function always works on a local copy of the reloc root list, which cannot be modified outside of it so using list_for_each_entry is fine. Additionally the macro handles empty lists so drop list_empty checks of callers. No semantic changes. Reviewed-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Deleting a subvolume on a full filesystem leads to ENOSPC followed by a forced read-only. This is not a transaction abort and the filesystem is otherwise ok, so the error should be just propagated to the callers. This is caused by unnecessary call to btrfs_handle_fs_error for all errors, except EAGAIN. This does not make sense as the standard transaction abort mechanism is in btrfs_drop_snapshot so all relevant failures are handled. Originally in commit cb1b69f4 ("Btrfs: forced readonly when btrfs_drop_snapshot() fails") there was no return value at all, so the btrfs_std_error made some sense but once the error handling and propagation has been implemented we don't need it anymore. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
The reclaim_size counter of a space_info object is unsigned. So its value can never be negative, it's pointless to have an assertion that checks its value is >= 0, therefore remove it. Reviewed-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Zheng Wei authored
Remove the duplicate definition of 'inode_item_err' in the file tree-checker.c that got there by accident in c23c77b0 ("btrfs: tree-checker: Refactor inode key check into seperate function"). Reviewed-by:
Zheng Wei <wei.zheng@vivo.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
Nikolay noticed a bunch of test failures with my global rsv steal patches. At first he thought they were introduced by them, but they've been failing for a while with 64k nodes. The problem is with 64k nodes we have a global reserve that calculates out to 13MiB on a freshly made file system, which only has 8MiB of metadata space. Because of changes I previously made we no longer account for the global reserve in the overcommit logic, which means we correctly allow overcommit to happen even though we are already overcommitted. However in some corner cases, for example btrfs/170, we will allocate the entire file system up with data chunks before we have enough space pressure to allocate a metadata chunk. Then once the fs is full we ENOSPC out because we cannot overcommit and the global reserve is taking up all of the available space. The most ideal way to deal with this is to change our space reservation stuff to take into account the height of the tree's that we're modifying, so that our global reserve calculation does not end up so obscenely large. However that is a huge undertaking. Instead fix this by forcing a chunk allocation if the global reserve is larger than the total metadata space. This gives us essentially the same behavior that happened before, we get a chunk allocated and these tests can pass. This is meant to be a stop-gap measure until we can tackle the "tree height only" project. Fixes: 0096420a ("btrfs: do not account global reserve in can_overcommit") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
With normal tickets we could have a large reservation at the front of the list that is unable to be satisfied, but a smaller ticket later on that can be satisfied. The way we handle this is to run btrfs_try_granting_tickets() in maybe_fail_all_tickets(). However no such protection exists for priority tickets. Fix this by handling it in handle_reserve_ticket(). If we've returned after attempting to flush space in a priority related way, we'll still be on the priority list and need to be removed. We rely on the flushing to free up space and wake the ticket, but if there is not enough space to reclaim _but_ there's enough space in the space_info to handle subsequent reservations then we would have gotten an ENOSPC erroneously. Address this by catching where we are still on the list, meaning we were a priority ticket, and removing ourselves and then running btrfs_try_granting_tickets(). This will handle this particular corner case. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
In debugging a generic/320 failure on ppc64, Nikolay noticed that sometimes we'd ENOSPC out with plenty of space to reclaim if we had committed the transaction. He further discovered that this was because there was a priority ticket that was small enough to fit in the free space currently in the space_info. Consider the following scenario. There is no more space to reclaim in the fs without committing the transaction. Assume there's 1MiB of space free in the space info, but there are pending normal tickets with 2MiB reservations. Now a priority ticket comes in with a .5MiB reservation. Because we have normal tickets pending we add ourselves to the priority list, despite the fact that we could satisfy this reservation. The flushing machinery now gets to the point where it wants to commit the transaction, but because there's a .5MiB ticket on the priority list and we have 1MiB of free space we assume the ticket will be granted soon, so we bail without committing the transaction. Meanwhile the priority flushing does not commit the transaction, and eventually fails with an ENOSPC. Then all other tickets are failed with ENOSPC because we were never able to actually commit the transaction. The fix for this is we should have simply granted the priority flusher his reservation, because there was space to make the reservation. Priority flushers by definition take priority, so they are allowed to make their reservations before any previous normal tickets. By not adding this priority ticket to the list the normal flushing mechanisms will then commit the transaction and everything will continue normally. We still need to serialize ourselves with other priority tickets, so if there are any tickets on the priority list then we need to add ourselves to that list in order to maintain the serialization between priority tickets. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
On ppc64le with 64k page size (respectively 64k block size) generic/320 was failing and debug output showed we were getting a premature ENOSPC with a bunch of space in btrfs_fs_info::trans_block_rsv. This meant there were still open transaction handles holding space, yet the flusher didn't commit the transaction because it deemed the freed space won't be enough to satisfy the current reserve ticket. Fix this by accounting for space in trans_block_rsv when deciding whether the current transaction should be committed or not. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
We previously had a limit of stealing 50% of the global reserve for unlink. This was from a time when the global reserve was used for the delayed refs as well. However now those reservations are kept separate, so the global reserve can be depleted much more to allow us to make progress for space restoring operations like unlink. Change the minimum amount of space required to be left in the global reserve to 10%. Reviewed-by:
-
Josef Bacik authored
For unlink transactions and block group removal btrfs_start_transaction_fallback_global_rsv will first try to start an ordinary transaction and if it fails it will fall back to reserving the required amount by stealing from the global reserve. This is problematic because of all the same reasons we had with previous iterations of the ENOSPC handling, thundering herd. We get a bunch of failures all at once, everybody tries to allocate from the global reserve, some win and some lose, we get an ENSOPC. Fix this behavior by introducing BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_ALL_STEAL. It's used to mark unlink reservation. To fix this we need to integrate this logic into the normal ENOSPC infrastructure. We still go through all of the normal flushing work, and at the moment we begin to fail all the tickets we try to satisfy any tickets that are allowed to steal by stealing from the global reserve. If this works we start the flushing system over again just like we would with a normal ticket satisfaction. This serializes our global reserve stealing, so we don't have the thundering herd problem. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For relocation tree detection, relocation backref cache uses btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() which uses relocation-specific checks like checking the DEAD_RELOC_ROOT bit. However for general purpose backref cache, we can rely on that check, as it's possible that relocation is also running. For generic purposed backref cache, we detect reloc root by SHARED_BLOCK_REF item. Only reloc root node has its parent bytenr pointing back to itself. And in that case, backref cache will mark the reloc root node useless, dropping any child orphan nodes. So only call btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() if the backref cache is for relocation. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The error cleanup will be extracted as a new function, btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), and moved to backref.c and exported for later usage. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
This the the 2nd major part of generic backref cache. Move it to backref.c so we can reuse it. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
This function is the major part of backref cache build process, move it to backref.c so we can reuse it later. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The backref code is going to be moved to backref.c, and read_fs_root() is just a simple wrapper, open-code it to prepare to the incoming code move. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
This function is mostly single purpose to relocation backref cache, but since we're moving the main part of backref cache to backref.c, we need to export such function. And to avoid confusion, rename the function to btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() make the name a little more clear. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Also change the parameter, since all callers can easily grab an fs_info, there is no need for all the pointer chasing. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Since we're releasing all existing nodes/edges, other than cleanup the mess after error, "release" is a more proper naming here. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Also add comment explaining the cleanup progress, to differ it from btrfs_backref_drop_node(). Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
With extra comment for drop_backref_node() as it has some similarity with remove_backref_node(), thus we need extra comment explaining the difference. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Structure tree_entry provides a very simple rb_tree which only uses bytenr as search index. That tree_entry is used in 3 structures: backref_node, mapping_node and tree_block. Since we're going to make backref_node independnt from relocation, it's a good time to extract the tree_entry into rb_simple_node, and export it into misc.h. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
These 3 structures are the main part of btrfs backref cache, move them to backref.h to build the basis for later reuse. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Those three structures are the main elements of backref cache. Add the "btrfs_" prefix for later export. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
This patch will also add some comment for the cleanup. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
After handle_one_tree_backref(), all newly added (not cached) edges and nodes have the following features: - Only backref_edge::list[LOWER] is linked. This means, we can only iterate from botton to top, not the other direction. - Newly added nodes are not added to cache rb_tree yet So to finish the backref cache, we still need to finish the links and add all nodes into backref cache rb_tree. This patch will refactor the existing code into finish_upper_links(), add more comments of each branch, and why we need to do all the work. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
build_backref_tree() uses "goto again;" to implement a breadth-first search to build backref cache. This patch will extract most of its work into a wrapper, handle_one_tree_block(), and use a do {} while() loop to implement the same thing. Reviewed-by: -
Qu Wenruo authored
Bytenr and level are essential parameters for backref_node, thus it makes sense to initialize them at allocation time. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Since backref_edge is used to connect upper and lower backref nodes, and needs to access both nodes, some code can look pretty nasty: list_add_tail(&edge->list[LOWER], &cur->upper); The above code will link @cur to the LOWER side of the edge, while both "LOWER" and "upper" words show up. This can sometimes be very confusing for reader to grasp. This patch introduces a new wrapper, link_backref_edge(), to handle the linking behavior. Which also has extra ASSERT() to ensure caller won't pass wrong nodes. Also, this updates the comment of related lists of backref_node and backref_edge, to make it more clear that each list points to what. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
The processing of indirect tree backref (TREE_BLOCK_REF) is the most complex work. We need to grab the fs root, do a tree search to locate all its parent nodes, link all needed edges, and put all uncached edges to pending edge list. This is definitely worth a helper function. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
For BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY, its processing is straightforward, as we now the parent node bytenr directly. If the parent is already cached, or a root, call it a day. If the parent is not cached, add it pending list. This patch will just refactor this part into its own function, handle_direct_tree_backref() and add some comment explaining the @ref_key parameter. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
find_reloc_root() searches reloc_control::reloc_root_tree to find the reloc root. This behavior is only useful for relocation backref cache. For the incoming more generic purpose backref cache, we don't care about who owns the reloc root, but only care if it's a reloc root. So this patch makes the following modifications to make the reloc root search more specific to relocation backref: - Add backref_node::is_reloc_root This will be an extra indicator for generic purposed backref cache. User doesn't need to read root key from backref_node::root to determine if it's a reloc root. Also for reloc tree root, it's useless and will be queued to useless list. - Add backref_cache::is_reloc This will allow backref cache code to do different behavior for generic purpose backref cache and relocation backref cache. - Pass fs_info to find_reloc_root() - Export find_reloc_root() So backref.c can utilize this function. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
Add this member so that we can grab fs_info without the help from reloc_control. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
These two new members will act the same as the existing local lists, @useless and @list in build_backref_tree(). Currently build_backref_tree() is only executed serially, thus moving such local list into backref_cache is still safe. Also since we're here, use list_first_entry() to replace a lot of list_entry() calls after !list_empty(). Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
These two functions are weirdly named, mark_block_processed() in fact just marks a range dirty unconditionally, while __mark_block_processed() does extra check before doing the marking. This patch will open code old mark_block_processed, and rename __mark_block_processed() to remove the "__" prefix. Since we're here, also kill the forward declaration, which could also kill in_block_group() with in_range() macro. Reviewed-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
In the core function of relocation, build_backref_tree, it needs to iterate all backref items of one tree block. Use btrfs_backref_iter infrastructure to do the loop and make the code more readable. The backref items look would be much more easier to read: ret = btrfs_backref_iter_start(iter, cur->bytenr); for (; ret == 0; ret = btrfs_backref_iter_next(iter)) { /* The really important work */ } Reviewed-by:Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by:
-
