- 29 Jun, 2018 4 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
make_obj_busy() makes a dummy busy object, but didn't attach the fence to the reservation object, so it would not have registered as busy. For completeness, attach the dummy request as the exclusive fence and mark the object as written (in i915_vma_move_to_active) Signed-off-by:
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180629133717.11761-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
We correctly attach the exclusive fetch for the scratch object when emitting a request that writes into it, but for completeness we should also declared the write to i915_vma_move_to_active() Reported-by:
-
Maarten Lankhorst authored
The only time we should start FBC is when we have waited a vblank after the atomic update. We've already forced a vblank wait by doing wait_for_flip_done before intel_post_plane_update(), so we don't need to wait a second time before enabling. Removing the worker simplifies the code and removes possible race conditions, like happening in 103167. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103167Signed-off-by:
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180625163758.10871-2-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.comReviewed-by:
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
-
Maarten Lankhorst authored
There is a small race window in which FBC can be enabled after pre_plane_update is called, but before the page flip has been queued or completed. Signed-off-by:
-
- 28 Jun, 2018 21 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Back in commit 27af5eea ("drm/i915: Move execlists irq handler to a bottom half"), we came to the conclusion that running our CSB processing and ELSP submission from inside the irq handler was a bad idea. A really bad idea as we could impose nearly 1s latency on other users of the system, on average! Deferring our work to a tasklet allowed us to do the processing with irqs enabled, reducing the impact to an average of about 50us. We have since eradicated the use of forcewaked mmio from inside the CSB processing and ELSP submission, bringing the impact down to around 5us (on Kabylake); an order of magnitude better than our measurements 2 years ago on Broadwell and only about 2x worse on average than the gem_syslatency on an unladen system. In this iteration of the tasklet-vs-direct submission debate, we seek a compromise where by we submit new requests immediately to the HW but defer processing the CS interrupt onto a tasklet. We gain the advantage of low-latency and ksoftirqd avoidance when waking up the HW, while avoiding the system-wide starvation of our CS irq-storms. Comparing the impact on the maximum latency observed (that is the time stolen from an RT process) over a 120s interval, repeated several times (using gem_syslatency, similar to RT's cyclictest) while the system is fully laden with i915 nops, we see that direct submission an actually improve the worse case. Maximum latency in microseconds of a third party RT thread (gem_syslatency -t 120 -f 2) x Always using tasklets (a couple of >1000us outliers removed) + Only using tasklets from CS irq, direct submission of requests +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | + | | + | | + | | + + | | + + + | | + + + + x x x | | +++ + + + x x x x x x | | +++ + ++ + + *x x x x x x | | +++ + ++ + * *x x * x x x | | + +++ + ++ * * +*xxx * x x xx | | * +++ + ++++* *x+**xx+ * x x xxxx x | | **x++++*++**+*x*x****x+ * +x xx xxxx x x | |x* ******+***************++*+***xxxxxx* xx*x xxx + x+| | |__________MA___________| | | |______M__A________| | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 118 91 186 124 125.28814 16.279137 + 120 92 187 109 112.00833 13.458617 Difference at 95.0% confidence -13.2798 +/- 3.79219 -10.5994% +/- 3.02677% (Student's t, pooled s = 14.9237) However the mean latency is adversely affected: Mean latency in microseconds of a third party RT thread (gem_syslatency -t 120 -f 1) x Always using tasklets + Only using tasklets from CS irq, direct submission of requests +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | xxxxxx + ++ | | xxxxxx + ++ | | xxxxxx + +++ ++ | | xxxxxxx +++++ ++ | | xxxxxxx +++++ ++ | | xxxxxxx +++++ +++ | | xxxxxxx + ++++++++++ | | xxxxxxxx ++ ++++++++++ | | xxxxxxxx ++ ++++++++++ | | xxxxxxxxxx +++++++++++++++ | | xxxxxxxxxxx x +++++++++++++++ | |x xxxxxxxxxxxxx x + + ++++++++++++++++++ +| | |__A__| | | |____A___| | +------------------------------------------------------------------------+ N Min Max Median Avg Stddev x 120 3.506 3.727 3.631 3.6321417 0.02773109 + 120 3.834 4.149 4.039 4.0375167 0.041221676 Difference at 95.0% confidence 0.405375 +/- 0.00888913 11.1608% +/- 0.244735% (Student's t, pooled s = 0.03513) However, since the mean latency corresponds to the amount of irqsoff processing we have to do for a CS interrupt, we only need to speed that up to benefit not just system latency but our own throughput. v2: Remember to defer submissions when under reset. v4: Only use direct submission for new requests v5: Be aware that with mixing direct tasklet evaluation and deferred tasklets, we may end up idling before running the deferred tasklet. v6: Remove the redudant likely() from tasklet_is_enabled(), restrict the annotation to reset_in_progress(). v7: Take the full timeline.lock when enabling perf_pmu stats as the tasklet is no longer a valid guard. A consequence is that the stats are now only valid for engines also using the timeline.lock to process state. Testcase: igt/gem_exec_latency/*rthog* References: 27af5eea ("drm/i915: Move execlists irq handler to a bottom half") Suggested-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Now that we use the CSB stored in the CPU friendly HWSP, we do not need to track interrupts for when the mmio CSB registers are valid and can just check where we read up to last from the cached HWSP. This means we can forgo the atomic bit tracking from interrupt, and in the next patch it means we can check the CSB at any time. v2: Change the splitting inside reset_prepare, we only want to lose testing the interrupt in this patch, the next patch requires the change in locking Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
As we now never read back our current head position from the CSB pointers register, and the HW itself doesn't use it to prevent overwriting unread CSB entries, we do not need to keep updating the register. As it turns out this register is not listed as being shadowed, and so requires forcewake -- but we haven't been taking forcewake around it so the writes has probably been regularly dropped. Fortuitously, we only read the value after a reset where it did not matter, and zero was the right answer (well, close enough). Mika pointed out that this was how we used to do it (accidentally!) before he fixed it in commit cc53699b ("drm/i915: Use masked write for Context Status Buffer Pointer"). References: cc53699b ("drm/i915: Use masked write for Context Status Buffer Pointer") Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
On HW reset, the HW clears the write pointer (to 0). But since it also writes its first CSB entry to slot 0, we need to reset the write pointer back to the element before (so the first entry we read is 0). This is required for the next patch, where we trust the CSB completely! v2: Use _MASKED_FIELD v3: Store the reset value, so that we differentiate between mmio/hwsp transparently and without pretense. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Following the removal of the last workarounds, the only CSB mmio access is for the old vGPU interface. The mmio registers presented by vGPU do not require forcewake and can be treated as ordinary volatile memory, i.e. they behave just like the HWSP access just at a different location. We can reduce the CSB access to a set of read/write/buffer pointers and treat the various paths identically and not worry about forcewake. (Forcewake is nightmare for worstcase latency, and we want to process this all with irqsoff -- no latency allowed!) v2: Comments, comments, comments. Well, 2 bonus comments. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
In the next patch, we will process the CSB events directly from the submission path, rather than only after a CS interrupt. Hence, we will no longer have the need for a loop until the has-interrupt bit is clear, and in the meantime can remove that small optimisation. v2: Tvrtko pointed out it was safer to unconditionally kick the tasklet after each irq, when assuming that the tasklet is called for each irq. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
In the following patch, we will process the CSB events under the timeline.lock and not serialised by the tasklet. This also means that we will need to protect access to common variables such as execlists->csb_head with the timeline.lock during reset. v2: Move sync_irq to avoid deadlocks between taking timeline.lock from our interrupt handler. v3: Kill off the synchronize_hardirq as it raises more questions than answered; now we use the timeline.lock entirely for CSB serialisation between the irq and elsewhere, we don't need to be so heavy handed with flushing v4: Treat request cancellation (wedging after failed reset) similarly Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
In the next patch, we will begin processing the CSB from inside the submission path (underneath an irqsoff section, and even from inside interrupt handlers). This means that updating the execlists->port[] will no longer be serialised by the tasklet but needs to be locked by the engine->timeline.lock instead. Pull dequeue and submit under the same lock for protection. (An alternate future plan is to keep the in/out arrays separate for concurrent processing and reduced lock coverage.) Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
We do not need to do a posting read of our uncached mmio write to re-enable the master interrupt lines after handling an interrupt, so don't. This saves us a slow UC read before we can process the interrupt, most noticeable in execlists where any stalls imposes extra latency on GPU command execution. Signed-off-by:
-
Michal Wajdeczko authored
We're fetching GuC/HuC firmwares directly from uc level during init_early stage but this breaks guc/huc struct isolation and also strict SW-only initialization rule for init_early. Move fw fetching to init phase and do it separately per guc/huc struct. v2: don't forget to move wopcm_init - Michele v3: fetch in init_misc phase - Michal Signed-off-by:
Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> #2 Signed-off-by:
-
Michal Wajdeczko authored
We will add more init steps to misc phase and there is no need to expose them separately for use in uc_init_misc function. Signed-off-by:
Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
Avoid calling dma_fence_signal() from inside the interrupt if we haven't enabled signaling on the request. Signed-off-by:
Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180627201304.15817-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
Chris Wilson authored
Rather than have multiple locked instructions inside the notify_ring() irq handler, move them inside the spinlock and reduce their intrinsic locking. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
If we have more interrupts pending (because we know there are more breadcrumb signals before the completion), then we do not need to trigger an irq_seqno_barrier or even wakeup the task on this interrupt as there will be another. To allow some margin of error (we are trying to work around incoherent seqno after all), we wakeup the breadcrumb before the target as well as on the target. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
By taking advantage of the RCU protection of the task struct, we can find the appropriate signaler under the spinlock and then release the spinlock before waking the task and signaling the fence. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
At the moment, gem_exec_gttfill fails with a sporadic EBUSY due to us wanting to unbind a pinned batch. Let's dump who first bound that vma to see if that helps us identify who still unexpectedly has it pinned. v2: We cannot allocate inside the printer (as it may be on an fs-reclaim path), so hope for the best and build the string on the stack v3: stack depth of 16 routinely overflows a 512 character string, limit it to 12 to avoid unsightly truncation. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Zimmermann authored
This patch unifies the naming of DRM functions for reference counting of struct drm_device. The resulting code is more aligned with the rest of the Linux kernel interfaces. Signed-off-by:
Thomas Zimmermann <tdz@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by:
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180618110154.30462-6-tdz@users.sourceforge.net
-
Thomas Zimmermann authored
This patch unifies the naming of DRM functions for reference counting of struct drm_gem_object. The resulting code is more aligned with the rest of the Linux kernel interfaces. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Zimmermann authored
This patch unifies the naming of DRM functions for reference counting of struct drm_gem_object. The resulting code is more aligned with the rest of the Linux kernel interfaces. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Zimmermann authored
This patch unifies the naming of DRM functions for reference counting of struct drm_gem_object. The resulting code is more aligned with the rest of the Linux kernel interfaces. Signed-off-by:
-
Thomas Zimmermann authored
This patch unifies the naming of DRM functions for reference counting of struct drm_connector. The resulting code is more aligned with the rest of the Linux kernel interfaces. Signed-off-by:
-
- 27 Jun, 2018 8 commits
-
-
Anusha Srivatsa authored
This patch addresses Interrupts from south display engine (SDE). ICP has two registers - SHOTPLUG_CTL_DDI and SHOTPLUG_CTL_TC. Introduce these registers and their intended values. Introduce icp_irq_handler(). The icp_irq_postinstall() takes care of enabling all PCH interrupt sources, to unmask them as needed with SDEIMR, as is done done by ibx_irq_pre_postinstall() for earlier platforms. We do not need to explicitly call the ibx_irq_pre_postinstall(). Also, while changing these, s/CPT/PPT/CPT-CNP comment. v2: - remove redundant register defines.(Lucas) - Change register names to be more consistent with previous platforms (Lucas) v3: -Reorder bit defines to a more appropriate location. Change the comments. Confirm in the commit message that icp_irq_postinstall() need not go to ibx_irq_pre_postinstall() and ibx_irq_postinstall() as in earlier platforms. (Paulo) Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.de.marchi@gmail.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa@intel.com> [Paulo: coding style bikesheds and rebases]. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
In the next^W forthcoming patch, we will start to defer retiring the request from the engine list if it is still active on the submission backend. To preserve the semantics that after wait-for-idle completes the system is idle and fully retired, we need to therefore wait for the backends to idle before calling i915_retire_requests(). Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
Add the definition for ICL power wells and their mapping to power domains. On ICL there are 3 power well control registers, we'll select the correct one based on higher bits of the power well ID. The offset for the control and status flags within this register is based on the lower bits of the ID as on older platforms. As the DC state programming is also the same as on old platforms we can reuse the corresponding helpers. For this we mark here the DC-off power well as shared among multiple platforms. Other than the above the delta between old platforms and ICL: - Pipe C has its own power well, so we can save some additional power in the pipe A+B and (non-eDP) pipe A configurations. - Power wells for port E/F DDI/AUX IO and Thunderbolt 1-4 AUX IO v2: - Rebase on drm-tip after prep patch for this was merged there as requested by Paulo. - Actually add the new AUX and DDI power well control regs (Rakshmi) v3: - Fix power well register names in code comments - Add TBT AUX->power well 3 dependency v4: - Rebase v5: - Detach AUX power wells from the INIT power domain. These power wells can only be enabled in a TC/TBT connected state and otherwise not needed during driver initialization. v6: - Use _MMIO_PORT(...) instead _MMIO(_PICK(...)) (Paulo) Fix checkpatch warnings. Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> Cc: Rakshmi Bhatia <rakshmi.bhatia@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com> (v1) Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
Sink can be configured to calculate the CRC over the static frame and compare with the CRC calculated and transmited in the VSC SDP by source, if there is a mismatch sink will do a short pulse in HPD and set DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR in DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS. Spec: 7723 v6: andling DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR here and remove "bdw+" from commit message v4: patch moved to after 'drm/i915/psr: Avoid PSR exit max time timeout' to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG. v3: disabling PSR instead of exiting on error Reviewed-by:
Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
Specification requires that max time should be masked from bdw and forward but it can be also safely enabled to hsw. This will make PSR exits more deterministic and only when really needed. If this was used to fix a issue in some panel than can only self-refresh for a few seconds, that panel will interrupt and assert one of the PSR errors handled in: 'drm/i915/psr: Handle PSR RFB storage error' and 'drm/i915/psr: Begin to handle PSR/PSR2 errors set by sink' Spec: 21664 v4: patch moved to before 'drm/i915/psr/bdw+: Enable CRC check in the static frame on the sink side' to avoid touch in 2 patches EDP_PSR_DEBUG. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
Sink will interrupt source when it have any PSR error. DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR is a PSR2 but already handling it here. The only missing error to be handled is DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR that will be taken in care in a futher patch. v6: not handling DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR here v5: handling all PSR errors here, so the commit message and comment have changed v3: disabling PSR instead of exiting on error Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
eDP spec states that sink device will do a short pulse in HPD line when there is a PSR/PSR2 error that needs to be handled by source, this is handling the first and most simples error: DP_PSR_SINK_INTERNAL_ERROR. Here taking the safest approach and disabling PSR(at least until the next modeset), to avoid multiple rendering issues due to bad pannels. v5: added lockdep_assert in psr_disable and renamed psr_disable() to intel_psr_disable_locked() v4: Using CAN_PSR instead of HAS_PSR in intel_psr_short_pulse v3: disabling PSR instead of exiting on error Reviewed-by:
-
José Roberto de Souza authored
It was only used in VLV/CHV so after the removal of the PSR support for those platforms it is not necessary any more. v7: Rebased Reviewed-by:
-
- 26 Jun, 2018 4 commits
-
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
Depending whether PSR1 or PSR2 was configured, we print a warning if the corresponding control mmio indicated PSR was erroneously enabled. As Chris pointed out, it makes more sense to check for both the mmio's since we expect neither PSR1 nor PSR2 to be enabled when psr_activate() is called. v2: Read PSR2 control register only on supported platforms (Rodrigo) Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by:
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180626090522.17682-1-dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
-
Dhinakaran Pandiyan authored
Commit 5422b37c ("drm/i915/psr: Kill delays when activating psr back.") switched from delayed work to the plain variant and while doing so removed the check for work_busy() before scheduling a PSR activation. This appears to cause consecutive executions of psr_activate() in this scenario - after a worker picks up the PSR work item for execution and before the work function can acquire the PSR mutex, a psr_flush() can get hold of the mutex and schedule another PSR work. Without a psr_exit() between the two psr_activate() calls, warning messages get printed. Further, since we drop the mutex in the midst of psr_work() to wait for PSR to idle, another work item can also get scheduled. Fix this by returning if PSR was already active. Fixes: 5422b37c ("drm/i915/psr: Kill delays when activating psr back.") Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106948 Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Rodrigo Vivi authored
At some point we introduced the function pointers on PSR code to help with VLV/CHV separation logic because it had a different HW implementation from PSR. Since all converged to HSW PSR and we dropped the VLV/CHV support, let's also kill the useless function pointers and leave the code cleaner. Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Imre Deak authored
So far we got an AUX power domain reference only for the duration of DP AUX transfers. However, the following suggests that we also need these for main link functionality: - The specification doesn't state whether it's needed or not for main link functionality, but suggests that these power wells need to be enabled already during display core initialization (Sequences to Initialize Display). - For PSR we need to keep the AUX power well enabled. - On ICL combo PHY ports (non-TC) the AUX power well is needed for link training too: while the port is enabled with a DP link training test pattern trying to toggle the AUX power well will time out. - On ICL MG PHY ports (TC) the AUX power well is needed also for main link functionality (both in DP and HDMI modes). - Windows enables these power wells both for main and AUX lane functionality. Based on the above take an AUX power reference for main link functionality too. This makes a difference only on GEN10+ (GLK+) platforms, where we have separate port specific AUX power wells. For PSR we still need to distinguish between port A and the other ports, since on port A DC states must stay enabled for main link functionality, but DC states must be disabled for driver initiated AUX transfers. So re-use the corresponding helper from intel_psr.c. Since we take now a reference for main link functionality on all DP ports we can forgo taking the separate power ref for PSR functionality. v2: - Make sure DC states stay enabled when taking the ref on port A. (Ville) v3: (Ville) - Fix comment about logic for encoders without a crtc state and add FIXME note for a simplification to avoid calling get_power_domains in such cases. - Use intel_crtc_has_dp_encoder() instead !intel_crtc_has_type(HDMI). Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- 25 Jun, 2018 3 commits
-
-
Chris Wilson authored
Due to how we only release the pining on the context state on retirement and never track activity on the context vma itself, the object can never be active at the point of release. Replace the conditional transfer of ownership onto an active-reference with an assert that the object is idle. Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
As we may cancel the ce->state allocation during context pinning (but crucially after we mark ce as operational), that means we may be asked to destroy a nonexistent ce->state. Given the choice in handing a complex error path on pinning, and just ignoring the lack of state in destroy, choice the latter for simplicity. Reported-by:
Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Chris Wilson authored
If we avoid cleaning up the old state immediately in intel_atomic_commit_tail() and defer it to a second task, we can avoid taking heavily contended locks when the caller is ready to procede. Subsequent modesets will wait for the cleanup operation (either directly via the ordered modeset wq or indirectly through the atomic helperr) which keeps the number of inflight cleanup tasks in check. As an example, during reset an immediate modeset is performed to disable the displays before the HW is reset, which must avoid struct_mutex to avoid recursion. Moving the cleanup to a separate task, defers acquiring the struct_mutex to after the GPU is running again, allowing it to complete. Even in a few patches time (optimist!) when we no longer require struct_mutex to unpin the framebuffers, it will still be good practice to minimise the number of contention points along reset. The mutex dependency still exists (as one modeset flushes the other), but in the short term it resolves the deadlock for simple reset cases. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101600Signed-off-by:
-
