Skip to content

L
linux
Switch branch/tag
  1. 03 Nov, 2019 9 commits
  3. 31 Oct, 2019 1 commit
    • Dave Chinner's avatar
      xfs: properly serialise fallocate against AIO+DIO · 249bd908
      Dave Chinner authored 
      AIO+DIO can extend the file size on IO completion, and it holds
no inode locks while the IO is in flight. Therefore, a race
condition exists in file size updates if we do something like this:

aio-thread			fallocate-thread

lock inode
submit IO beyond inode->i_size
unlock inode
.....
				lock inode
				break layouts
				if (off + len > inode->i_size)
					new_size = off + len
				.....
				inode_dio_wait()
				<blocks>
.....
completes
inode->i_size updated
inode_dio_done()
....
				<wakes>
				<does stuff no long beyond EOF>
				if (new_size)
					xfs_vn_setattr(inode, new_size)


Yup, that attempt to extend the file size in the fallocate code
turns into a truncate - it removes the whatever the aio write
allocated and put to disk, and reduced the inode size back down to
where the fallocate operation ends.

Fundamentally, xfs_file_fallocate()  not compatible with racing
AIO+DIO completions, so we need to move the inode_dio_wait() call
up to where the lock the inode and break the layouts.

Secondly, storing the inode size and then using it unchecked without
holding the ILOCK is not safe; we can only do such a thing if we've
locked out and drained all IO and other modification operations,
which we don't do initially in xfs_file_fallocate.

It should be noted that some of the fallocate operations are
compound operations - they are made up of multiple manipulations
that may zero data, and so we may need to flush and invalidate the
file multiple times during an operation. However, we only need to
lock out IO and other space manipulation operations once, as that
lockout is maintained until the entire fallocate operation has been
completed.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      249bd908
  5. 29 Oct, 2019 19 commits
  7. 28 Oct, 2019 8 commits
  9. 24 Oct, 2019 3 commits
    • Jan Kara's avatar
      xfs: Sanity check flags of Q_XQUOTARM call · 3dd4d40b
      Jan Kara authored 
      Flags passed to Q_XQUOTARM were not sanity checked for invalid values.
Fix that.

Fixes: 9da93f9b ("xfs: fix Q_XQUOTARM ioctl")
Reported-by: default avatarYang Xu <xuyang2018.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: default avatarEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      3dd4d40b
    • Ben Dooks (Codethink)'s avatar
      xfs: add mising include of xfs_pnfs.h for missing declarations · 1aa63006
      Ben Dooks (Codethink) authored 
      The xfs_pnfs.c file is missing an include of xfs_pnfs.h to
add the prototypes of the functions it exports. Include this
file to fix the following sparse warnings:

fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c:27:1: warning: symbol 'xfs_break_leased_layouts' was not declared. Should it be static?
fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c:52:1: warning: symbol 'xfs_fs_get_uuid' was not declared. Should it be static?
fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c:77:1: warning: symbol 'xfs_fs_map_blocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
fs/xfs/xfs_pnfs.c:226:1: warning: symbol 'xfs_fs_commit_blocks' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: default avatarBen Dooks (Codethink) <ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      1aa63006
    • Brian Foster's avatar
      xfs: don't set bmapi total block req where minleft is · da781e64
      Brian Foster authored 
      xfs_bmapi_write() takes a total block requirement parameter that is
passed down to the block allocation code and is used to specify the
total block requirement of the associated transaction. This is used
to try and select an AG that can not only satisfy the requested
extent allocation, but can also accommodate subsequent allocations
that might be required to complete the transaction. For example,
additional bmbt block allocations may be required on insertion of
the resulting extent to an inode data fork.

While it's important for callers to calculate and reserve such extra
blocks in the transaction, it is not necessary to pass the total
value to xfs_bmapi_write() in all cases. The latter automatically
sets minleft to ensure that sufficient free blocks remain after the
allocation attempt to expand the format of the associated inode
(i.e., such as extent to btree conversion, btree splits, etc).
Therefore, any callers that pass a total block requirement of the
bmap mapping length plus worst case bmbt expansion essentially
specify the additional reservation requirement twice. These callers
can pass a total of zero to rely on the bmapi minleft policy.

Beyond being superfluous, the primary motivation for this change is
that the total reservation logic in the bmbt code is dubious in
scenarios where minlen < maxlen and a maxlen extent cannot be
allocated (which is more common for data extent allocations where
contiguity is not required). The total value is based on maxlen in
the xfs_bmapi_write() caller. If the bmbt code falls back to an
allocation between minlen and maxlen, that allocation will not
succeed until total is reset to minlen, which essentially throws
away any additional reservation included in total by the caller. In
addition, the total value is not reset until after alignment is
dropped, which means that such callers drop alignment far too
aggressively than necessary.

Update all callers of xfs_bmapi_write() that pass a total block
value of the mapping length plus bmbt reservation to instead pass
zero and rely on xfs_bmapi_minleft() to enforce the bmbt reservation
requirement. This trades off slightly less conservative AG selection
for the ability to preserve alignment in more scenarios.
xfs_bmapi_write() callers that incorporate unrelated or additional
reservations in total beyond what is already included in minleft
must continue to use the former.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
      da781e64
GitLab Nexedi Edition | About GitLab | About Nexedi | 沪ICP备2021021310号-2 | 沪ICP备2021021310号-7