1. 24 Sep, 2018 3 commits
    • Janusz Krzysztofik's avatar
      gpiolib: Fix array members of same chip processed separately · c4c958aa
      Janusz Krzysztofik authored
      New code introduced by commit bf9346f5 ("gpiolib: Identify arrays
      matching GPIO hardware") forcibly tries to find an array member which
      has its array index number equal to its hardware pin number and set
      up an array info for possible fast bitmap processing of all arrray
      pins belonging to that chip which also satisfy that numbering rule.
      
      Depending on array content, it may happen that consecutive array
      members which belong to the same chip but don't have array indexes
      equal to their pin hardware numbers will be split into groups, some of
      them processed together via the fast bitmap path, and rest of them
      separetely.  However, applications may expect all those pins being
      processed together with a single call to .set_multiple() chip callback,
      like that was done before the change.
      
      Limit applicability of fast bitmap processing path to cases where all
      pins of consecutive array members starting from 0 which belong to the
      same chip have their hardware numbers equal to their corresponding
      array indexes.  That should still speed up processing of applications
      using whole GPIO banks as I/O ports, while not breaking simultaneous
      manipulation of consecutive pins of the same chip which don't follow
      the equal numbering rule.
      
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJanusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: default avatarMarek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      c4c958aa
    • Janusz Krzysztofik's avatar
      gpiolib: Fix missing updates of bitmap index · 35ae7f96
      Janusz Krzysztofik authored
      In new code introduced by commit b17566a6 ("gpiolib: Implement fast
      processing path in get/set array"), bitmap index is not updated with
      next found zero bit position as it should while skipping over pins
      already processed via fast bitmap path, possibly resulting in an
      infinite loop.  Fix it.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJanusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
      Tested-by: default avatarMarek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      35ae7f96
    • Linus Walleij's avatar
      gpio: htc-egpio: Unique label per chip · 212d7069
      Linus Walleij authored
      Give the HTC EGPIO chips unique names, htc-egpio-0,
      htc-egpio-1 etc, so that it gets possible to associate
      machine descriptor tables with individual chips.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      212d7069
  2. 20 Sep, 2018 8 commits
  3. 17 Sep, 2018 15 commits
  4. 14 Sep, 2018 1 commit
  5. 13 Sep, 2018 6 commits
    • Janusz Krzysztofik's avatar
      gpiolib: Implement fast processing path in get/set array · b17566a6
      Janusz Krzysztofik authored
      Certain GPIO descriptor arrays returned by gpio_get_array() may contain
      information on direct mapping of array members to pins of a single GPIO
      chip in hardware order.  In such cases, bitmaps of values can be passed
      directly from/to the chip's .get/set_multiple() callbacks without
      wasting time on iterations.
      
      Add respective code to gpiod_get/set_array_bitmap_complex() functions.
      Pins not applicable for fast path are processed as before, skipping
      over the 'fast' ones.
      
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJanusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      b17566a6
    • Janusz Krzysztofik's avatar
      gpiolib: Pass array info to get/set array functions · 77588c14
      Janusz Krzysztofik authored
      In order to make use of array info obtained from gpiod_get_array() and
      speed up processing of arrays matching single GPIO chip layout, that
      information must be passed to get/set array functions.  Extend the
      functions' API with that additional parameter and update all users.
      Pass NULL if a user builds an array itself from single GPIOs.
      
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Cc: Miguel Ojeda Sandonis <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
      Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Cc: Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@savoirfairelinux.com>
      Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
      Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
      Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
      Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de>
      Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
      Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
      Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
      Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
      Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>
      Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
      Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
      Cc: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
      Cc: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
      Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJanusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      77588c14
    • Janusz Krzysztofik's avatar
      gpiolib: Identify arrays matching GPIO hardware · bf9346f5
      Janusz Krzysztofik authored
      Certain GPIO array lookup results may map directly to GPIO pins of a
      single GPIO chip in hardware order.  If that condition is recognized
      and handled efficiently, significant performance gain of get/set array
      functions may be possible.
      
      While processing a request for an array of GPIO descriptors, identify
      those which represent corresponding pins of a single GPIO chip.  Skip
      over pins which require open source or open drain special processing.
      Moreover, identify pins which require inversion.  Pass a pointer to
      that information with the array to the caller so it can benefit from
      enhanced performance as soon as get/set array functions can accept and
      make efficient use of it.
      
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJanusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      bf9346f5
    • Janusz Krzysztofik's avatar
      gpiolib: Pass bitmaps, not integer arrays, to get/set array · b9762beb
      Janusz Krzysztofik authored
      Most users of get/set array functions iterate consecutive bits of data,
      usually a single integer, while processing array of results obtained
      from, or building an array of values to be passed to those functions.
      Save time wasted on those iterations by changing the functions' API to
      accept bitmaps.
      
      All current users are updated as well.
      
      More benefits from the change are expected as soon as planned support
      for accepting/passing those bitmaps directly from/to respective GPIO
      chip callbacks if applicable is implemented.
      
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Cc: Miguel Ojeda Sandonis <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
      Cc: Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@savoirfairelinux.com>
      Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
      Cc: Peter Korsgaard <peter.korsgaard@barco.com>
      Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
      Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
      Cc: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Rojhalat Ibrahim <imr@rtschenk.de>
      Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
      Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
      Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
      Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
      Cc: Michael Hennerich <Michael.Hennerich@analog.com>
      Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
      Cc: Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@gmx.de>
      Cc: Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
      Cc: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@googlemail.com>
      Cc: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarJanusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: default avatarUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
      Reviewed-by: default avatarGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
      Tested-by: default avatarGeert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      b9762beb
    • Uwe Kleine-König's avatar
      gpiolib: Don't support irq sharing for userspace · fa38869b
      Uwe Kleine-König authored
      This concerns gpio edge detection for GPIO IRQs used from
      userspace for GPIO event listeners.
      
      Trying to work out the right event if it's not sure that the
      examined gpio actually moved is impossible.
      
      Consider two gpios "gpioA" and "gpioB" that share an interrupt.
      gpioA's irq should trigger on any edge, gpioB's on a falling edge.
      If now the common irq fires and both gpio lines are high, there
      are several possibilities that could have happend:
      
       a) gpioA just had a low-to-high edge
       b) gpioB just had a high-to-low-to-high spike
       c) a combination of both a) and b)
      
      While c) is unlikely (in most setups) a) and b) alone are bad
      enough. Currently the code assumes case a) unconditionally and
      doesn't report an event for gpioB. Note that even if there is no
      irq sharing involved a spike for a gpio might not result in an
      event if it's configured to trigger for a single edge only.
      
      The only way to improve this is to drop support for interrupt
      sharing. This way a spike results in an event for the right gpio
      at least. Note that apart from dropping IRQF_SHARED this
      effectively undoes commit df1e76f2
      ("gpiolib: skip unwanted events, don't convert them to opposite edge").
      
      This obviously breaks setups that rely on interrupt sharing,
      but given that this cannot be reliable, this is probably an
      acceptable trade-off.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
      [Assuming there are no users of interrupt sharing yet]
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
      fa38869b
    • Geert Uytterhoeven's avatar
  6. 12 Sep, 2018 2 commits
  7. 11 Sep, 2018 2 commits
  8. 10 Sep, 2018 3 commits