- 10 Nov, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
Make sure we don't list a block twice in the agfl by copying the contents of the AGFL to an array, sorting it, and looking for duplicates. We can easily check that the number of agfl entries we see actually matches the flcount, so do that too. Signed-off-by:
Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
-
- 09 Nov, 2017 13 commits
-
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
Use the uint* types instead of the u_int* types. This will (hopefully) pair with an xfsprogs cleanup. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
And also rename fill to nr_entries to match the rest of the code. Reported-by:
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Reported-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Reported-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Reported-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Fix to check the correct value, and remove a duplicate handling of the uneven record number split algorith, Reported-by:
-
Tim Hansen authored
kmem_cache_destroy already checks for null values. Signed-off-by:
Tim Hansen <devtimhansen@gmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
It turns out that we only started zeroing a new da btree node's block header on v5 filesystems. Prior to that, we just wouldn't set anything at all, which means that the pad field never got set and would retain whatever happened to be in memory. Therefore, we can only check the pad for zeroness on v5 filesystems. shared/006 on a v4 filesystem exposes this scrub bug. Signed-off-by:
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
The btree scrubber has some custom code to retrieve and check a btree block via xfs_btree_lookup_get_block. This function will either return an error code (verifiers failed) or a *pblock will be untouched (bad pointer). Since we previously set *pblock to NULL, we need to check *pblock, not pblock, to trigger the early bailout. Signed-off-by:
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
Fix smatch complaints about uninitialized return codes. Signed-off-by:
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
There are two ways to scrub an inode -- calling xfs_iget and checking the raw inode core, or by loading the inode cluster buffer and checking the on-disk contents directly. The second method is only useful if _iget fails the verifiers; when this is the case, sc->ip is NULL and calling the tracepoint will cause a system crash. Therefore, pass the raw inode number directly into the _preen and _warning functions. Reported-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Darrick J. Wong authored
In a directory data block, the zeroth bestfree item must point to the longest free space. Therefore, when we check the bestfree block's records against the data blocks, we only need to compare with bf[0] and don't need the loop. The weird loop was most probably the result of an earlier refactoring gone bad. Reported-by:
-
- 06 Nov, 2017 26 commits
-
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
We already did it in the forward declaration, but not for the function body itself. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
We already did it in the forward declaration, but not for the function body itself. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
[darrick: fix broken initializer in xfs_scrub_xattr] Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Ever since we added the noinline tag there is no good reason to define away the static for debug builds - we'll get just as good debug information with our without it, so don't mess up sparse and other checkers due to it. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Neither defines an on-disk format, so move them out of xfs_format.h. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
This removed an unaligned load per extent, as well as the manual poking into the on-disk extent format. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
We only have two places that remove 2 extents at the same time, so unroll the loop there. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
We only have two places that insert 2 extents at the same time, so unroll the loop there. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Replace the current linear list and the indirection array for the in-core extent list with a b+tree to avoid the need for larger memory allocations for the indirection array when lots of extents are present. The current extent list implementations leads to heavy pressure on the memory allocator when modifying files with a high extent count, and can lead to high latencies because of that. The replacement is a b+tree with a few quirks. The leaf nodes directly store the extent record in two u64 values. The encoding is a little bit different from the existing in-core extent records so that the start offset and length which are required for lookups can be retreived with simple mask operations. The inner nodes store a 64-bit key containing the start offset in the first half of the node, and the pointers to the next lower level in the second half. In either case we walk the node from the beginninig to the end and do a linear search, as that is more efficient for the low number of cache lines touched during a search (2 for the inner nodes, 4 for the leaf nodes) than a binary search. We store termination markers (zero length for the leaf nodes, an otherwise impossible high bit for the inner nodes) to terminate the key list / records instead of storing a count to use the available cache lines as efficiently as possible. One quirk of the algorithm is that while we normally split a node half and half like usual btree implementations we just spill over entries added at the very end of the list to a new node on its own. This means we get a 100% fill grade for the common cases of bulk insertion when reading an inode into memory, and when only sequentially appending to a file. The downside is a slightly higher chance of splits on the first random insertions. Both insert and removal manually recurse into the lower levels, but the bulk deletion of the whole tree is still implemented as a recursive function call, although one limited by the overall depth and with very little stack usage in every iteration. For the first few extents we dynamically grow the list from a single extent to the next powers of two until we have a first full leaf block and that building the actual tree. The code started out based on the generic lib/btree.c code from Joern Engel based on earlier work from Peter Zijlstra, but has since been rewritten beyond recognition. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
To make life a little simpler make xfs_bmbt_set_all unaligned access aware so that we can use it directly on the destination buffer. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Supporting a small bit of data inside the inode fork blows up the fork size a lot, removing the 32 bytes of inline data halves the effective size of the inode fork (and it still has a lot of unused padding left), and the performance of a single kmalloc doesn't show up compared to the size to read an inode or create one. It also simplifies the fork management code a lot. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Instead of looking up extents to convert and calling xfs_bmapi_write on each of them just let xfs_bmapi_write handle the full range. To make this robust add a new XFS_BMAPI_CONVERT_ONLY that only converts ranges and never allocates blocks. [darrick: shorten the stringified CONVERT_ONLY trace flag] Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Match the iteration order for extent deletion in the truncate and reflink I/O completion path. This also happens to make implementing the new incore extent list a lot easier. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Add a new xfs_iext_cursor structure to hide the direct extent map index manipulations. In addition to the existing lookup/get/insert/ remove and update routines new primitives to get the first and last extent cursor, as well as moving up and down by one extent are provided. Also new are convenience to increment/decrement the cursor and retreive the new extent, as well as to peek into the previous/next extent without updating the cursor and last but not least a macro to iterate over all extents in a fork. [darrick: rename for_each_iext to for_each_xfs_iext] Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
This actually makes the function very slightly less efficient for now as we detour through the expanded irect format between the in-core extent format and the on-disk one instead of just endian swapping them. But with the incore extent btree the in-core one will use a different format and the representation will be entirely hidden. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
This actually makes the function very slightly less efficient for now as we detour through the expanded irect format between the in-core extent format and the on-disk one instead of just endian swapping them. But with the incore extent btree the in-core one will use a different format and the representation will be entirely hidden. It also happens to make the function a whole more readable. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
This prepares for getting rid of the current in-memory extent format. At the end of the series we will change the calling convention again to pass the xfs_bmbt_irec structure once it is available everywhere. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Stop poking before and after the index and just increment or decrement it while doing our operations on it to prepare for a new extent list implementation. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Stop poking before and after the index and just increment or decrement it while doing our operations on it to prepare for a new extent list implementation. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Stop poking before and after the index and just increment or decrement it while doing our operations on it to prepare for a new extent list implementation. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Stop poking before and after the index and just increment or decrement it while doing our operations on it to prepare for a new extent list implementation. Signed-off-by:
-
Christoph Hellwig authored
Stop poking before and after the index and just increment or decrement it while doing our operations on it to prepare for a new extent list implementation. Signed-off-by:
-
