When we fail for some reason on loading the PDPs, it would be wise to
disable the PPGTT in the ring registers. If we do not do this, we have
undefined results.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

SNB has another register where the actual FBC CPU fence number is
stored. The documenation explicitly states that the fence number
in DPFC_CTL must be 0 on SNB. And in fact when it's not zero,
the GTT tracking simply doesn't work.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Oops, makes testing early boot failures in i915.ko a bit more pain, so
let's fix it.

v2: We already have a bit of static storage to track this (Chris).
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Too many t's.

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

gcc complains that:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: In function ‘display_crc_ctl_write’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:2393:2: warning: ‘val’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:2350:6: note: ‘val’ was declared here

but it can't see that we're going to use val only in the success case.
So shut it up.

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We need to hold the pc8 lock around toggling the value of gpu_idle.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We send the primary and cursor plane data through the gamma unit.
In order to get matching output from sprites, also send the sprite
data through the gamma unit.

In the future we should add some properties to control this
explicitly, and also add properties for the per-sprite gamma ramps
what have you, but for now this seems like a reasonable thing to do.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

All the other .enable_fbc() funcs use plane_name(). Make
gen7_enable_fbc() do the same.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

At least since SNB (perhaps even earlier) even the desktop parts
should have FBC.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The spec tells us that we need to emit an SRM after the LRI
to MSG_FBC_REND_STATE.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Don't issue the FBC nuke/cache clean command when invalidate_domains!=0.
That would indicate that we're not being called for the post-batch
flush.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This was forgotten in

commit 9d1cb914
Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Nov 1 13:32:08 2013 -0200

    drm/i915: avoid unclaimed registers when capturing the error state

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

It seems we do have machines with 3 HDMI/DVI outputs, so sharing
WRPLLs is the only way to get 3 pipes working.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68485Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Now we have this everywhere. Next up would be to wire up the DP
hotplug pin to speed up panel power sequencing for eDP panels ...

I've decided to leave the has_aux_irq logic in the code, it should
come handy for hw bringup.

For testing/fail-safety the dp aux code already has a timeout when
waiting for interrupts to signal completion and screams rather loud if
they don't arrive in time. Given that we need a real piece of hw to
talk to anyway this is probably as good as it gets.

v2: Don't check the dp aux channel bits on i965 machines, they have a
different meaning there. Yay for reusing bits at will! Spotted by
Jani.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Pull in Jani's backlight rework branch. This was merged through a
separate branch to be able to sort out the Broadwell conflicts
properly before pulling it into the main development branch.

Conflicts:
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Merge the bdw changes into the backlight rework branch so that we can
adapt the new code for bdw, too.  This is a bit a mess, but doing this
another way would have delayed the merging of the backlight
refactoring. Mea culpa.

As discussed with Jani on irc only do bdw-specific callbacks for the
set/get methods and bake in the only other special-case into the pch
enable function.

Conflicts:
	drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c

v2: Don't enable the PWM too early for bdw (Jani).

v3: Create new bdw_ functions for setup and enable - the rules change
sufficiently imo with the switch from controlling the pwm from the cpu
to controlling it completel from the pch to warrant this.

v4: Rip out unused pipe variable in bdw_enable_backlight (0-day
builder).

Tested-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (on bdw)
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We don't init the lock nor set up all the other state. And it doesn't
make sense anyway.

This appeases lockdep when running the igt/drv_debugfs_reader test.
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We have a nice macro, so use it.
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The backlight enable code now has the smarts to do the right thing. Only
do backlight register save/restore in UMS.

Some VLV specific code gets dropped as UMS is not supported on VLV.

v2: Move save/restore to UMS instead of removing completely (Daniel).
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

No longer needed. We now have fully cached max backlight values.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The quirk was added as what I'd say was a stopgap measure in

commit e85843be
Author: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@canonical.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 19 15:02:01 2013 -0700

    drm/i915: quirk no PCH_PWM_ENABLE for Dell XPS13 backlight

without really digging into what was going on.

Also, as mentioned in the related bug [1], having the quirk regressed
some of the machines it was supposed to fix to begin with, and there
were patches posted to disable the quirk on such machines [2]!

The fact is, we do need the BLM_PCH_PWM_ENABLE bit set to have
backlight. With the quirk, we've relied on BIOS to have set it, and our
save/restore code to retain it. With the full backlight setup at enable,
we have no place for things that rely on previous state.

With the per platform hooks, we've also made a change in the PCH
platform enable order: setting the backlight duty cycle between CPU and
PCH PWM enable. Some experimenting and

commit 770c1231
Author: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Date:   Sat Aug 11 08:56:42 2012 +0200

    drm/i915: Fix blank panel at reopening lid

indicate that we can't set the backlight before enabling CPU PWM; the
value just won't stick. But AFAICT we should do it before enabling the
PCH PWM.

Finally, any fallout we should fix properly, preferrably without quirks,
and absolutely without quirks that rely on existing state. With the per
platform hooks have much more flexibility to adjust the sequence as
required by platforms.

[1] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47941
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378229848-29113-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.comSigned-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We should now have all the information we need to do a full
initialization of the backlight registers.

v2: Keep QUIRK_NO_PCH_PWM_ENABLE for now (Imre).
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The pipe B and pipe C interrupt mask and enable registers are now part
of the pipe, so disabling the pipe power wells will lost the contests of
the registers.

Art totally debugged this one!

v2: Use the irq_lock to clarify code, and prevent future bugs (Daniel)

Cc: Art Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Make sparse happy.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Because of the way in which we're allocating the pages for the Aliasing
PPGTT, we cannot actually successfully alloc enough space for anything
greater than 2GB.

Instead of a quick hack to fix this, we should defer until we have the
real solution in place (allocating much less contiguous space).

This wasn't found sooner because we didn't not have any systems
supporting more than a 2GB GTT.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This confused me some many times that I think it is appropriate to add a
small comment to instruct the reader of the code that it is indeed doing
what it is supposed to do.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

I am unclear how this got messed up in the shuffle, but it did.

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

This patch existed before, but was lost over time.

Note that reset is still somewhat problematic in my limited testing (ie.
module_reload will not pass) but it can be disabled with a module
parameter, and support should be considered preliminary anyway.
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Prior to Haswell the CPU control register for backlight
(BLC_PWM_CPU_CTL) toggled the PCH baclight pin for us. This made some
sense as there was no pin on the CPU. With Haswell came the introduction
of a CPU backlight pin, but the interface was still controlled by
software with the same mechnism. Behind the scenes, hardware did all the
dirty work for us.

Broadwell no longer provides this for free. If we want to use the PCH
backlight pin [1] then we have to set the override bit BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1
and program BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL2 for the PWM values.

This patch implements that. This patch is compile tested only, and given
that I rarely if ever touch this code, careful review is welcome.

[1] According to Art, we know of no devices that exist which use the CPU
pin (and remember it has existed already on HSW). If such a device does
exist, we'll have to handle it properly - this is left as TODO until
then.

v2: Drop the abstraction prep patch, as a bigger backlight overhaul is
    in the works, and do just the mimimal bdw enabling now. (by Jani)

CC: Art Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For what we care about ULT and ULX are interchangeable. We know of 3
types of pciids for these cases. I am not sure if at some point we will
need to distinguish ULT and ULX.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Prepare for being able to use the information at enable.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

It's been 5 years since kms support was merged and roughly 4 years
since UMS support was ripped out from userspace drivers.

Thus far it's not been a big burden to keep the ums paths alive, and
we've made some good progress in better separating it from the kms
code by sprinkling DRIVER_MODESET checks all over the place.

But now that the drm demidlayering is within reach this changes. I
want to make the driver loading code more robust using devres.c and
other cool tricks. But that doesn't work with ums due to the
shadow-attach trick. Which means we either
a) need to split out a complete ums codebase like radeon has
b) kill it for good.

The 2nd option is obviously much less work than the first, so I think
it's time to test the waters and see how many people out there still
use ums.

I've decided that silently failing to initialize the driver (and not
e.g. failing to load the module) is the right thing. That way we
should only get reports from users that actually care about some ums
features (like accelerated gl or support for secondary outputs).
Everyone else will just fall back to the vesa X driver.

For developers there's a small info level dmesg output.

The plan is to drop this Kconfig option after 3.16 (so gives us 2 full
releases) and then start killing code for real 2-3 releases
afterwards. That should be more than enough time for users to pipe up.

Of course if anyone does we need to revisit this plan and maybe go
with option a) above.

Also enable the KMS support by default in Kconfig and polish the help
texts a bit.

v2: Add the missing hunk of actual code changes. Oops. (Ville)

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Thus far we've tried to carefully work around the fact that old
userspace relied on the AGP-backed legacy buffer mapping ioctls for a
bit too long. But it's really horribly, and now some new users for it
started to show up again:

http://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org/msg45547.html

This uses drmAgpSize to figure out the GTT size, which is both the
wrong thing to inquire and also might force us to keep this crap
around for another few years.

So I want to stop this particular zombie from raising ever again. Now
it's only been 4 years since XvMC was fixed for gen3, so a bit early
by the usual rules. But since Linus explicitly said that an ABI
breakage only counts if someone actually observes it I want to tempt
fate an accelarate the demise of AGP.

We probably need to wait 2-3 kernel releases with this shipping until
we go on a killing spree code-wise.

v2: Remove intel_agp_enabled since it's unused (Ville).

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Most platforms din't hit this condition, but if we want to allow
building without agp we should also make this allowed on gen3.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

One last patch I keep forgetting to include.  Fix for EDID quirk
handling.  Been on the list and reviewed for several months now,
I just keep forgetting about it.

* 'drm-next-3.13' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux:
  drm/edid: compare actual vrefresh for all modes for quirks

Merge tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2013-11-12' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel into drm-next

Just one patch to fix compile fail for CONFIG_ACPI=n. Figured I better
send this out quickly to minimize the broken build span. Otherwise no
bugfixes (besides some bdw stuff) anywhere in sight.

* tag 'drm-intel-fixes-2013-11-12' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~danvet/drm-intel:
  drm/i915/opregion: fix build error on CONFIG_ACPI=n

The page-prot bit fix.

* 'ttm-next-3.13' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~thomash/linux:
  drm/ttm: Fix vma page_prot bit manipulation

A resource eviction fix, and a fix for compilation / sparse problems
from the previous pull.

* 'vmwgfx-next-3.13' of git://people.freedesktop.org/~thomash/linux:
  drm/vmwgfx: Fix a couple of compile / sparse warnings and errors
  drm/vmwgfx: Resource evict fixes

Insist that flags and pad fields are zero, so that
we can safely extend the interface in future.

Testcase: igt/gem_reset_stats/params
Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We now have the max backlight value cached. Use it.
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>