- 18 Feb, 2003 34 commits
-
-
Alan Cox authored
Fixes hangs on Micron Samurai boards
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
also Enable ATI IGP/ALi combo
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
This is the only user I'll feed you this time. As with 2.4 I want it to run for a bit on read only media first 8)
-
Alan Cox authored
We need to copy the new io op. Actually we need to shoot the entire mess in this function and make the drivers always set it but not today.
-
Alan Cox authored
(is_flashcard is unneeded outside ide_probe as we have a drive->flash check)
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
Some drivers need this. Its in the core as the core eventually needs to be doing the tracking here
-
Alan Cox authored
The iops struct may be a good idea in the longer run but right now its unused and its mess that can be restored neatly later on.
-
Alan Cox authored
(second hunk just makes 2.4/2.5 header match format)
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
Now handled at runtime
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
We cannot do an identify on a drive with no driver loaded. The kernel has a ton of half backed "if no driver" cases but they dont cover all cases and its a mess. For now we rely on the probe time identify unless a driver is loaded. A proper fix (an 'ide-unassigned' driver) will follow later
-
Alan Cox authored
Fix crash with slave and no master Fix crash with hdb=noprobe hdb=cdrom Fix crash with pre ATA devices refusing IDENTIFY Fix flash slave making master disappear Add interfaces that the PPC uses to do disk spin up when the BIOS has not Add framework to allow hdparm -d1 on a box built with IDE_DMA_ONLYDISK Fix identify framework so we can fix the proc identify crash too
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
Also adds the new OUTBSYNC iop
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
Remove ide_ioreg_t Add locking on the ide setting lists
-
Alan Cox authored
-
Alan Cox authored
This abstracts out the mmio copies as PPC at least has better ways to this and there are other issues on other platforms. It keeps DaveM happy too 8)
-
Alan Cox authored
Ok this first piece eliminates some of the use of ide_ioreg_t, which actually only works as a ulong anyway. Its a dysfunctional abstraction. We also need the ide pci stuff if we have IDE PCI not if we have PCI but only legacy mode IDE support
-
Andries E. Brouwer authored
There is no reason to have both BSD_PARTITION and FREEBSD_PARTITION denoting the same partition type.
-
- 17 Feb, 2003 6 commits
-
-
Neil Brown authored
When a raid1 or raid5 array is in 'safe-mode', then the array is marked clean whenever there are no outstanding write requests, and is marked dirty again before allowing any write request to proceed. This means than an unclean shutdown while no write activity is happening will NOT cause a resync to be required. However it does mean extra updates to the superblock. Currently safe-mode is turned on by sending SIGKILL to the raid thread as would happen at a normal shutdown. This should mean that the reboot notifier is no longer needed. After looking more at performance issues I may make safemode be on all the time. I will almost certainly make it on when RAID5 is degraded as an unclean shutdown of a degraded RAID5 means data loss. This code was provided by Angus Sawyer <angus.sawyer@dsl.pipex.com>
-
Neil Brown authored
This allows the thread to easily identified and signalled. The point of signalling will appear in the next patch.
-
Neil Brown authored
From Art Haas <ahaas@airmail.net>: This converts md.c to use C99 initializers to improve readability and remove warnings if '-W' is used.
-
Neil Brown authored
by the nature of multipath, already be in-sync, so we should set the in-sync flag.
-
Neil Brown authored
From Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>: gcc-2.95.3 is getting an internal compiler error with CONFIG_LBD=y. Reorganising the code a bit made it go away.
-
Neil Brown authored
This call the super_90_load is meant to make sure that the new superblock is consistant with a pre-exisitnig one (on rdev0)... but rdev0 was not passed :-(
-