- 25 Aug, 2016 4 commits
-
-
Alex Lyakas authored
do_chunk_alloc returns 1 when it succeeds to allocate a new chunk. But flush_space will not convert this to 0, and will also return 1. As a result, reserve_metadata_bytes will think that flush_space failed, and may potentially return this value "1" to the caller (depends how reserve_metadata_bytes was called). The caller will also treat this as an error. For example, btrfs_block_rsv_refill does: int ret = -ENOSPC; ... ret = reserve_metadata_bytes(root, block_rsv, num_bytes, flush); if (!ret) { block_rsv_add_bytes(block_rsv, num_bytes, 0); return 0; } return ret; So it will return -ENOSPC. Signed-off-by:Alex Lyakas <alex@zadarastorage.com> Reviewed-by:
Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Reviewed-by:
Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
Liu Bo authored
This adds several ASSERT()' s to report memory leak of block group cache. Signed-off-by:
-
Qu Wenruo authored
When over 1000 file extents refers to one extent, find_parent_nodes() will be obviously slow, due to the O(n^2)~O(n^3) loops inside __merge_refs(). The following ftrace shows the cubic growth of execution time: 256 refs 5) + 91.768 us | __add_keyed_refs.isra.12 [btrfs](); 5) 1.447 us | __add_missing_keys.isra.13 [btrfs](); 5) ! 114.544 us | __merge_refs [btrfs](); 5) ! 136.399 us | __merge_refs [btrfs](); 512 refs 6) ! 279.859 us | __add_keyed_refs.isra.12 [btrfs](); 6) 3.164 us | __add_missing_keys.isra.13 [btrfs](); 6) ! 442.498 us | __merge_refs [btrfs](); 6) # 2091.073 us | __merge_refs [btrfs](); and 1024 refs 7) ! 368.683 us | __add_keyed_refs.isra.12 [btrfs](); 7) 4.810 us | __add_missing_keys.isra.13 [btrfs](); 7) # 2043.428 us | __merge_refs [btrfs](); 7) * 18964.23 us | __merge_refs [btrfs](); And sort them into the following char: (Unit: us) ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Trace function | 256 ref | 512 refs | 1024 refs | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ __add_keyed_refs | 91 | 249 | 368 | __add_missing_keys | 1 | 3 | 4 | __merge_refs 1st call | 114 | 442 | 2043 | __merge_refs 2nd call | 136 | 2091 | 18964 | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ We can see the that __add_keyed_refs() grows almost in linear behavior. And __add_missing_keys() in this case doesn't change much or takes much time. While for the 1st __merge_refs() it's square growth for the 2nd __merge_refs() call it's cubic growth. It's no doubt that merge_refs() will take a long long time to execute if the number of refs continues its grows. So add a cond_resced() into the loop of __merge_refs(). Although this will solve the problem of soft lockup, we need to use the new rb_tree based structure introduced by Lu Fengqi to really solve the long execution time. Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
When some critical errors occur and FS would be flipped into RO, if we have an on-going balance, we can end up with a memory leak of root->reloc_root since btrfs_drop_snapshots() bails out without freeing reloc_root at the very early start. However, we're not able to free reloc_root in btrfs_drop_snapshots() because its caller, merge_reloc_roots(), still needs to access it to cleanup reloc_root's rbtree. This makes us free reloc_root when we're going to free fs/file roots. Signed-off-by:
-
- 05 Aug, 2016 1 commit
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Merge branch 'integration-4.8' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/fdmanana/linux into for-linus-4.8
-
- 03 Aug, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
Jeff Mahoney's cleanup commit (14a1e067) wasn't correct for csums on machines where the pagesize >= metadata blocksize. This just reverts the relevant hunks to bring the old math back. Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
No longer used as of commit 5846a3c2 ("btrfs: qgroup: Fix a race in delayed_ref which leads to abort trans"). Signed-off-by:
Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
- 01 Aug, 2016 11 commits
-
-
Filipe Manana authored
With commit 56f23fdb ("Btrfs: fix file/data loss caused by fsync after rename and new inode") we got simple fix for a functional issue when the following sequence of actions is done: at transaction N create file A at directory D at transaction N + M (where M >= 1) move/rename existing file A from directory D to directory E create a new file named A at directory D fsync the new file power fail The solution was to simply detect such scenario and fallback to a full transaction commit when we detect it. However this turned out to had a significant impact on throughput (and a bit on latency too) for benchmarks using the dbench tool, which simulates real workloads from smbd (Samba) servers. For example on a test vm (with a debug kernel): Unpatched: Throughput 19.1572 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=1005.229 ms Patched: Throughput 23.7015 MB/sec 32 clients 32 procs max_latency=809.206 ms The patched results (this patch is applied) are similar to the results of a kernel with the commit 56f23fdb ("Btrfs: fix file/data loss caused by fsync after rename and new inode") reverted. This change avoids the fallback to a transaction commit and instead makes sure all the names of the conflicting inode (the one that had a name in a past transaction that matches the name of the new file in the same parent directory) are logged so that at log replay time we don't lose neither the new file nor the old file, and the old file gets the name it was renamed to. This also ends up avoiding a full transaction commit for a similar case that involves an unlink instead of a rename of the old file: at transaction N create file A at directory D at transaction N + M (where M >= 1) remove file A create a new file named A at directory D fsync the new file power fail Signed-off-by:
-
Filipe Manana authored
When we attempt to read an inode from disk, we end up always returning an -ESTALE error to the caller regardless of the actual failure reason, which can be an out of memory problem (when allocating a path), some error found when reading from the fs/subvolume btree (like a genuine IO error) or the inode does not exists. So lets start returning the real error code to the callers so that they don't treat all -ESTALE errors as meaning that the inode does not exists (such as during orphan cleanup). This will also be needed for a subsequent patch in the same series dealing with a special fsync case. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
When doing an incremental send, if we find a new/modified/deleted extent, reference or xattr without having previously processed the corresponding inode item we end up exexuting a BUG_ON(). This is because whenever an extent, xattr or reference is added, modified or deleted, we always expect to have the corresponding inode item updated. However there are situations where this will not happen due to transient -ENOMEM or -ENOSPC errors when doing delayed inode updates. For example, when punching holes we can succeed in deleting and modifying (shrinking) extents but later fail to do the delayed inode update. So after such failure we close our transaction handle and right after a snapshot of the fs/subvol tree can be made and used later for a send operation. The same thing can happen during truncate, link, unlink, and xattr related operations. So instead of executing a BUG_ON, make send return an -EIO error and print an informative error message do dmesg/syslog. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
The caller of send_utimes() is supposed to be sure that the inode number it passes to this function does actually exists in the send snapshot. However due to logic/algorithm bugs (such as the one fixed by the patch titled "Btrfs: send, fix invalid leaf accesses due to incorrect utimes operations"), this might not be the case and when that happens it makes send_utimes() access use an unrelated leaf item as the target inode item or access beyond a leaf's boundaries (when the leaf is full and path->slots[0] matches the number of items in the leaf). So if the call to btrfs_search_slot() done by send_utimes() does not find the inode item, just make sure send_utimes() returns -ENOENT and does not silently accesses unrelated leaf items or does invalid leaf accesses, also allowing us to easialy and deterministically catch such algorithmic/logic bugs. Signed-off-by: -
Robbie Ko authored
During an incremental send, if we have delayed rename operations for inodes that were children of directories which were removed in the send snapshot, we can end up accessing incorrect items in a leaf or accessing beyond the last item of the leaf due to issuing utimes operations for the removed inodes. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- c/ (ino 262) | |--- b/ (ino 258) | |--- d/ (ino 263) | |--- del/ (ino 261) |--- x/ (ino 259) |--- y/ (ino 260) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- b/ (ino 258) | |--- c/ (ino 262) | |--- y/ (ino 260) | |--- d/ (ino 263) |--- x/ (ino 259) 1) When processing inodes 259 and 260, we end up delaying their rename operations because their parents, inodes 263 and 262 respectively, were not yet processed and therefore not yet renamed; 2) When processing inode 262, its rename operation is issued and right after the rename operation for inode 260 is issued. However right after issuing the rename operation for inode 260, at send.c:apply_dir_move(), we issue utimes operations for all current and past parents of inode 260. This means we try to send a utimes operation for its old parent, inode 261 (deleted in the send snapshot), which does not cause any immediate and deterministic failure, because when the target inode is not found in the send snapshot, the send.c:send_utimes() function ignores it and uses the leaf region pointed to by path->slots[0], which can be any unrelated item (belonging to other inode) or it can be a region outside the leaf boundaries, if the leaf is full and path->slots[0] matches the number of items in the leaf. So we end up either successfully sending a utimes operation, which is fine and irrelevant because the old parent (inode 261) will end up being deleted later, or we end up doing an invalid memory access tha crashes the kernel. So fix this by making apply_dir_move() issue utimes operations only for parents that still exist in the send snapshot. In a separate patch we will make send_utimes() return an error (-ENOENT) if the given inode does not exists in the send snapshot. Signed-off-by:Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Robbie Ko authored
Under certain situations, when doing an incremental send, we can end up not freeing orphan_dir_info structures as soon as they are no longer needed. Instead we end up freeing them only after finishing the send stream, which causes a warning to be emitted: [282735.229200] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [282735.229968] WARNING: CPU: 9 PID: 10588 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6298 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe2f/0xe51 [btrfs] [282735.231282] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [282735.237130] CPU: 9 PID: 10588 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [282735.239309] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [282735.240160] 0000000000000000 ffff880224273ca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [282735.240160] 0000000000000000 ffff880224273ce8 ffffffff81052b14 0000189a24273ac8 [282735.240160] ffff8802210c9800 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [282735.240160] Call Trace: [282735.240160] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [282735.240160] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [282735.240160] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [282735.240160] [<ffffffffa03c99d5>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe2f/0xe51 [btrfs] [282735.240160] [<ffffffffa0398358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [282735.240160] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [282735.240160] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [282735.240160] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [282735.240160] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [282735.240160] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [282735.240160] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [282735.240160] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [282735.240160] [<ffffffff81100c6b>] ? time_hardirqs_off+0x9/0x14 [282735.240160] [<ffffffff8108e87d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x1f/0xaa [282735.256343] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f93 ]--- Consider the following example: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- c/ (ino 260) | |--- del/ (ino 259) |--- tmp/ (ino 258) |--- x/ (ino 261) |--- y/ (ino 262) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- x/ (ino 261) | |--- y/ (ino 262) | |--- c/ (ino 260) |--- tmp/ (ino 258) 1) When processing inode 258, we end up delaying its rename operation because it has an ancestor (in the send snapshot) that has a higher inode number (inode 260) which was also renamed in the send snapshot, therefore we delay the rename of inode 258 so that it happens after inode 260 is renamed; 2) When processing inode 259, we end up delaying its deletion (rmdir operation) because it has a child inode (258) that has its rename operation delayed. At this point we allocate an orphan_dir_info structure and tag inode 258 so that we later attempt to see if we can delete (rmdir) inode 259 once inode 258 is renamed; 3) When we process inode 260, after renaming it we finally do the rename operation for inode 258. Once we issue the rename operation for inode 258 we notice that this inode was tagged so that we attempt to see if at this point we can delete (rmdir) inode 259. But at this point we can not still delete inode 259 because it has 2 children, inodes 261 and 262, that were not yet processed and therefore not yet moved (renamed) away from inode 259. We end up not freeing the orphan_dir_info structure allocated in step 2; 4) We process inodes 261 and 262, and once we move/rename inode 262 we issue the rmdir operation for inode 260; 5) We finish the send stream and notice that red black tree that contains orphan_dir_info structures is not empty, so we emit a warning and then free any orphan_dir_structures left. So fix this by freeing an orphan_dir_info structure once we try to apply a pending rename operation if we can not delete yet the tagged directory. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: -
Robbie Ko authored
Under certain situations, an incremental send operation can contain a rmdir operation that will make the receiving end fail when attempting to execute it, because the target directory is not yet empty. Consider the following example: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- c/ (ino 260) | |--- del/ (ino 259) |--- tmp/ (ino 258) |--- x/ (ino 261) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- a/ (ino 257) | |--- x/ (ino 261) | |--- c/ (ino 260) |--- tmp/ (ino 258) 1) When processing inode 258, we delay its rename operation because inode 260 is its new parent in the send snapshot and it was not yet renamed (since 260 > 258, that is, beyond the current progress); 2) When processing inode 259, we realize we can not yet send an rmdir operation (against inode 259) because inode 258 was still not yet renamed/moved away from inode 259. Therefore we update data structures so that after inode 258 is renamed, we try again to see if we can finally send an rmdir operation for inode 259; 3) When we process inode 260, we send a rename operation for it followed by a rename operation for inode 258. Once we send the rename operation for inode 258 we then check if we can finally issue an rmdir for its previous parent, inode 259, by calling the can_rmdir() function with a value of sctx->cur_ino + 1 (260 + 1 = 261) for its "progress" argument. This makes can_rmdir() return true (value 1) because even though there's still a child inode of inode 259 that was not yet renamed/moved, which is inode 261, the given value of progress (261) is not lower then 261 (that is, not lower than the inode number of some child of inode 259). So we end up sending a rmdir operation for inode 259 before its child inode 261 is processed and renamed. So fix this by passing the correct progress value to the call to can_rmdir() from within apply_dir_move() (where we issue delayed rename operations), which should match stcx->cur_ino (the number of the inode currently being processed) and not sctx->cur_ino + 1. A test case for fstests follows soon. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
Example scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 277) |---- tmp/ (ino 278) |---- pre/ (ino 280) | |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281) | |---- desc/ (ino 282) |---- ance/ (ino 283) | |---- below_ance/ (ino 279) | |---- other_dir/ (ino 284) Send snapshot: . (ino 277) |---- tmp/ (ino 278) |---- other_dir/ (ino 284) |---- below_ance/ (ino 279) | |---- pre/ (ino 280) | |---- wait_dir/ (ino 281) |---- desc/ (ino 282) |---- ance/ (ino 283) While computing the send stream the following steps happen: 1) While processing inode 279 we end up delaying its rename operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 284, was not yet processed and therefore not yet renamed; 2) Later when processing inode 280 we end up renaming it immediately to "ance/below_once/pre" and not delay its rename operation because its new parent (inode 279 in the send snapshot) has its rename operation delayed and inode 280 is not an encestor of inode 279 (its parent in the send snapshot) in the parent snapshot; 3) When processing inode 281 we end up delaying its rename operation because its new parent in the send snapshot, inode 284, was not yet processed and therefore not yet renamed; 4) When processing inode 282 we do not delay its rename operation because its parent in the send snapshot, inode 281, already has its own rename operation delayed and our current inode (282) is not an ancestor of inode 281 in the parent snapshot. Therefore inode 282 is renamed to "ance/below_ance/pre/wait_dir"; 5) When processing inode 283 we realize that we can rename it because one of its ancestors in the send snapshot, inode 281, has its rename operation delayed and inode 283 is not an ancestor of inode 281 in the parent snapshot. So a rename operation to rename inode 283 to "ance/below_ance/pre/wait_dir/desc/ance" is issued. This path is invalid due to a missing path building loop that was undetected by the incremental send implementation, as inode 283 ends up getting included twice in the path (once with its path in the parent snapshot). Therefore its rename operation must wait before the ancestor inode 284 is renamed. Fix this by not terminating the rename dependency checks when we find an ancestor, in the send snapshot, that has its rename operation delayed. So that we continue doing the same checks if the current inode is not an ancestor, in the parent snapshot, of an ancestor in the send snapshot we are processing in the loop. The problem and reproducer were reported by Robbie Ko, as part of a patch titled "Btrfs: incremental send, avoid ancestor rename to descendant". However the fix was unnecessarily complicated and can be addressed with much less code and effort. Reported-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
The function path_loop() can return a negative integer, signaling an error, 0 if there's no path loop and 1 if there's a path loop. We were treating any non zero values as meaning that a path loop exists. Fix this by explicitly checking for errors and gracefully return them to user space. Signed-off-by: -
Robbie Ko authored
When doing an incremental send we can end up not moving directories that have the same name. This happens when the same parent directory has different child directories with the same name in the parent and send snapshots. For example, consider the following scenario: Parent snapshot: . (ino 256) |---- d/ (ino 257) | |--- p1/ (ino 258) | |---- p1/ (ino 259) Send snapshot: . (ino 256) |--- d/ (ino 257) |--- p1/ (ino 259) |--- p1/ (ino 258) The directory named "d" (inode 257) has in both snapshots an entry with the name "p1" but it refers to different inodes in both snapshots (inode 258 in the parent snapshot and inode 259 in the send snapshot). When attempting to move inode 258, the operation is delayed because its new parent, inode 259, was not yet moved/renamed (as the stream is currently processing inode 258). Then when processing inode 259, we also end up delaying its move/rename operation so that it happens after inode 258 is moved/renamed. This decision to delay the move/rename rename operation of inode 259 is due to the fact that the new parent inode (257) still has inode 258 as its child, which has the same name has inode 259. So we end up with inode 258 move/rename operation waiting for inode's 259 move/rename operation, which in turn it waiting for inode's 258 move/rename. This results in ending the send stream without issuing move/rename operations for inodes 258 and 259 and generating the following warnings in syslog/dmesg: [148402.979747] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148402.980588] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6177 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.981928] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148402.986999] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148402.988136] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018212139fac8 [148402.988136] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148402.988136] Call Trace: [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa04bc831>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe03/0xe51 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148402.988136] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.011373] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8b ]--- [148403.012296] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [148403.013071] WARNING: CPU: 14 PID: 4117 at fs/btrfs/send.c:6194 btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.014447] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq acpi_cpufreq tpm_tis ppdev tpm parport_pc psmouse parport sg pcspkr i2c_piix4 i2c_core evdev processor serio_raw button loop autofs4 ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ata_generic virtio_scsi ata_piix libata virtio_pci virtio_ring virtio e1000 scsi_mod floppy [last unloaded: btrfs] [148403.019708] CPU: 14 PID: 4117 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G W 4.6.0-rc7-btrfs-next-31+ #1 [148403.020104] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS by qemu-project.org 04/01/2014 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fca8 ffffffff8126b42c 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] 0000000000000000 ffff88022139fce8 ffffffff81052b14 000018322139fac8 [148403.020104] ffff88022b0db400 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 [148403.020104] Call Trace: [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8126b42c>] dump_stack+0x67/0x90 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052b14>] __warn+0xc2/0xdd [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81052beb>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x1f [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa04bc847>] btrfs_ioctl_send+0xe19/0xe51 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffffa048b358>] btrfs_ioctl+0x14f/0x1f81 [btrfs] [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e456>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108eb51>] ? __lock_is_held+0x3c/0x57 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118da05>] vfs_ioctl+0x18/0x34 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e00c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x550/0x5be [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196f0c>] ? __fget+0x6b/0x77 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff81196fa1>] ? __fget_light+0x62/0x71 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8118e0d1>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8149e025>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x18/0xa8 [148403.020104] [<ffffffff8108e89d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x3f/0xaa [148403.038981] ---[ end trace a4539270c8056f8c ]--- There's another issue caused by similar (but more complex) changes in the directory hierarchy that makes move/rename operations fail, described with the following example: Parent snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) | |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- d/ (ino 263) |---- ance/ (ino 267) |---- e/ (ino 264) |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- ance/ (ino 266) Send snapshot: . |---- a/ (ino 262) |---- c/ (ino 268) | |---- ance/ (ino 267) | |---- d/ (ino 263) | |---- ance/ (ino 266) | |---- f/ (ino 265) |---- e/ (ino 264) When the inode 265 is processed, the path for inode 267 is computed, which at that time corresponds to "d/ance", and it's stored in the names cache. Later on when processing inode 266, we end up orphanizing (renaming to a name matching the pattern o<ino>-<gen>-<seq>) inode 267 because it has the same name as inode 266 and it's currently a child of the new parent directory (inode 263) for inode 266. After the orphanization and while we are still processing inode 266, a rename operation for inode 266 is generated. However the source path for that rename operation is incorrect because it ends up using the old, pre-orphanization, name of inode 267. The no longer valid name for inode 267 was previously cached when processing inode 265 and it remains usable and considered valid until the inode currently being processed has a number greater than 267. This resulted in the receiving side failing with the following error: ERROR: rename d/ance/ance -> d/ance failed: No such file or directory So fix these issues by detecting such circular dependencies for rename operations and by clearing the cached name of an inode once the inode is orphanized. A test case for fstests will follow soon. Signed-off-by: -
Filipe Manana authored
When we start an fsync we start ordered extents for all delalloc ranges. However before attempting to log the inode, we only wait for those ordered extents if we are not doing a full sync (bit BTRFS_INODE_NEEDS_FULL_SYNC is set in the inode's flags). This means that if an ordered extent completes with an IO error before we check if we can skip logging the inode, we will not catch and report the IO error to user space. This is because on an IO error, when the ordered extent completes we do not update the inode, so if the inode was not previously updated by the current transaction we end up not logging it through calls to fsync and therefore not check its mapping flags for the presence of IO errors. Fix this by checking for errors in the flags of the inode's mapping when we notice we can skip logging the inode. This caused sporadic failures in the test generic/331 (which explicitly tests for IO errors during an fsync call). Signed-off-by:
-
- 26 Jul, 2016 22 commits
-
-
Chris Mason authored
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
__btrfs_abort_transaction doesn't use its root parameter except to obtain an fs_info pointer. We can obtain that from trans->root->fs_info for now and from trans->fs_info in a later patch. Signed-off-by:
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
btrfs_trans_handle->root is documented as for use for confirming that the root passed in to start the transaction is the same as the one ending it. It's used in several places when an fs_info pointer is needed, so let's just add an fs_info pointer directly. Eventually, the root pointer can be removed. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
In btrfs_relocate_chunk, we get a transaction handle via btrfs_start_trans_remove_block_group, which starts the transaction using the extent root. When we call btrfs_end_transaction, we're calling it using the chunk root. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
This patch converts the macros used to calculate various node size limits to static inlines. That way we get type checking for free. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
We use BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE - sizeof(struct btrfs_item) in several places. This introduces a BTRFS_MAX_ITEM_SIZE macro to do the same. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
The function isn't implemented anywhere. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
The root parameter for copy_to_sk is not used at all. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
We just need a superblock, but we look it up using two different roots depending on the call site. Let's just use a superblock pointer initialized at the outset. This is mostly for Coccinelle not to choke on my root push up set. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
Now that we have a dummy fs_info associated with each test that uses a root, we don't need the DUMMY_ROOT bit anymore. This lets us make choices without needing an actual root like in e.g. btrfs_find_create_tree_block. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
This allows the upcoming patchset to push nodesize and sectorsize into fs_info. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
We have all these stubs that only exist because they're called from btrfs_run_sanity_tests, which is a static inside super.c. Let's just move it all into tests/btrfs-tests.c and only have one stub. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
btrfs_test_opt and friends only use the root pointer to access the fs_info. Let's pass the fs_info directly in preparation to eliminate similar patterns all over btrfs. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
When using trace events to debug a problem, it's impossible to determine which file system generated a particular event. This patch adds a macro to prefix standard information to the head of a trace event. The extent_state alloc/free events are all that's left without an fs_info available. Signed-off-by:
-
Jeff Mahoney authored
In order to provide an fsid for trace events, we'll need a btrfs_fs_info pointer. The most lightweight way to do that for btrfs_work structures is to associate it with the __btrfs_workqueue structure. Each queued btrfs_work structure has a workqueue associated with it, so that's a natural fit. It's a privately defined structures, so we add accessors to retrieve the fs_info pointer. Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
The mixed blockgroup reporting has been fixed by commit ae02d1bd "btrfs: fix mixed block count of available space" Signed-off-by:
-
David Sterba authored
Signed-off-by: -
Nikolay Borisov authored
Recently during a crash it became apparent that this particular message can be printed so many times that it causes the softlockup detector to trigger. Fix it by ratelimiting it. Signed-off-by:
Nikolay Borisov <kernel@kyup.com> Signed-off-by:
-
Nikolay Borisov authored
This patch adds ratelimiting to all messages which are not using the _rl version of the various printing APIs in btrfs. This is designed to be used as a safety net, since a flood messages might cause the softlockup detector to trigger. To reduce interference between different classes of messages use a separate ratelimit state for every class of message. Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
Mounting a btrfs can resume previous balance operations asynchronously. An user got a crash when one drive has some corrupt sectors. Since balance can cancel itself in case of any error, we can gracefully return errors to upper layers and let balance do the cancel job. Reported-by:
sash <master.b.at.raven@chefmail.de> Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
During build_backref_tree(), if we fail to read a btree node, we can eventually run into BUG_ON(cache->nr_nodes) that we put in backref_cache_cleanup(), meaning we have at least one memory leak. This frees the backref_node that we's allocated at the very beginning of build_backref_tree(). Signed-off-by:
-
Liu Bo authored
eb->io_pages is set in read_extent_buffer_pages(). In case of readpage failure, for pages that have been added to bio, it calls bio_endio and later readpage_io_failed_hook() does the work. When this eb's page (couldn't be the 1st page) fails to add itself to bio due to failure in merge_bio(), it cannot decrease eb->io_pages via bio_endio, and ends up with a memory leak eventually. This lets __do_readpage propagate errors to callers and adds the 'atomic_dec(&eb->io_pages)'. Signed-off-by:
-
