-
seppo authored
The original crash happened when async replication IO thread was updating mysql.gtid_slave_pos table. Operations on this table should remain node local, but it appears that protection (THD::wsrep_ignore_table flag) to prevent wsrep replication for this table mas missing for innodb write_row() and update_row(). It was somewhat difficult to reproduce the issue, because mtr seems to create the affected table mysql.gtid_log_pos as of Aria engine type, and Aria engine operations will not be replicated anyhow. It looks, though, that in release installation, mysql.gtid_slave_pos table is of InnoDB engine. It was possible to trigger somewhat related problem by running test galera.galera_as_slave_gtid with configuration: gtid_pos_auto_engines=InnoDB. However, this test mode, causes earlier crash when replication background thread creates aditional table: mysql.gtid_slave_pos_InnoDB, and this table create triggered wsrep TOI replication, which also failed for assertion. Actually, async replication IO and background threads should not replicate anything to cluster. This pull request contains new test galera.galera_as_slave_gtid_auto_engine, which basically just runs galera.galera_as_slave_gtid with configuration of gtid_pos_auto_engines=InnoDB. Test galera.galera_as_slave_gtid is also modified for better code reuse. Actual fix for MDEV-21096 is in storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc, where THD::wsrep_ignore_table flag is now honored before wsrep key population. There is additional fix in sql/service_wsrep.cc where async replication IO and background threads are marked as non-local. This fences these threads out of wsrep replication altogether. Note that this change, actually makes the use of THD::wsrep_ignore-table redundant. We may want to refactor THD::wsrep_ignore_table out in the future, if there is no other use case for it in sight.
4111a530