• unknown's avatar
    Fix bug lp:817384 · a6037394
    unknown authored
    This bug is a special case of lp:813447.
    
    Analysis:
    Constant optimization finds that the condition t2.a = 1
    can be used to access the primary key of table 't2'. As
    a result both outer table t1,t2 are considered as constant
    when we reach the execution phase. At the same time, during
    constant optimization, the IN predicate is not evaluated
    because it is expensive.
    
    When execution of the outer query reaches do_select(),
    control flow enter the branch:
    if (join->table_count == join->const_tables)
    { ... }
    This branch checks only the WHERE and HAVING clauses,
    but doesn't check the ON clauses of the query. Since the
    IN predicate was not evaluated during optimization, it is
    not evaluated at all, thus execution doesn't detect that
    the ON clause is FALSE.
    
    Solution:
    Similar to the patch for bug lp:813447, exclude system
    tables from constant substitution based on unique key
    lookups if there is an expensive ON condition on the
    inner table.
    a6037394
subselect_no_mat.result 176 KB