-
Sergei Golubchik authored
rarely (try --repeat 1000), the following happens: * from wsrep_bf_abort (when a thread is being killed), wsrep-lib starts streaming_rollback that wants to convert_streaming_client_to_applier. wsrep_create_streaming_applier creates a new THD(). All while the other THD is being killed, so under LOCK_thd_kill and LOCK_thd_data. In particular, THD::init() takes LOCK_global_system_variables under LOCK_thd_kill. * updating @@wsrep_slave_threads takes LOCK_global_system_variables and LOCK_wsrep_cluster_config (in that order) and invokes wsrep_slave_threads_update() that takes LOCK_wsrep_slave_threads * wsrep_replication_process() takes LOCK_wsrep_slave_threads and invokes wsrep_close_applier(), that does thd->set_killed() which takes LOCK_thd_kill. et voilà. As a fix I copied a workaround from wsrep_cluster_address_update() to wsrep_slave_threads_update(). It seems to be safe: without mutexes a race condition is possible and a concurrent SET might change wsrep_slave_threads, but wsrep_slave_threads_update() always verifies if there's a need to do something, so it will not run twice in this case, it'll be a no-op.
b91e77cf