Commit 0a43df4f authored by Sergei Golubchik's avatar Sergei Golubchik

MDEV-14735 better matching order for grants

fixes
MDEV-14732 mysql.db privileges evaluated on order of grants rather than hierarchically
MDEV-8269 Correct fix for Bug #20181776 :- ACCESS CONTROL DOESN'T MATCH MOST SPECIFIC HOST WHEN IT CONTAINS WILDCARD

reimplement the old ad hoc get_sort() function to use a wildcard
pattern ordering logic that works correctly in may be all practical cases.

get_sort() is renamed to catch merge errors at compilation time.
moved to a separate included file, because of a long comment.
parent fd00c449
......@@ -102,3 +102,28 @@ u6 Y mysql_old_password 78a302dd267f6044
u7 Y mysql_old_password 78a302dd267f6044
u8 Y nonexistent 78a302dd267f6044
drop user u1@h, u2@h, u3@h, u4@h, u5@h, u6@h, u7@h, u8@h;
create database mysqltest_1;
create user twg@'%' identified by 'test';
create table mysqltest_1.t1(id int);
grant create, drop on `mysqltest_1%`.* to twg@'%';
grant all privileges on `mysqltest_1`.* to twg@'%';
connect conn1,localhost,twg,test,mysqltest_1;
insert into t1 values(1);
disconnect conn1;
connection default;
revoke all privileges, grant option from twg@'%';
grant create, drop on `mysqlt%`.* to twg@'%';
grant all privileges on `mysqlt%1`.* to twg@'%';
connect conn1,localhost,twg,test,mysqltest_1;
insert into t1 values(1);
disconnect conn1;
connection default;
revoke all privileges, grant option from twg@'%';
grant create, drop on `mysqlt%`.* to twg@'%';
grant all privileges on `%mysqltest_1`.* to twg@'%';
connect conn1,localhost,twg,test,mysqltest_1;
insert into t1 values(1);
disconnect conn1;
connection default;
drop database mysqltest_1;
drop user twg@'%';
......@@ -86,3 +86,41 @@ select user,select_priv,plugin,authentication_string from mysql.user where user
# but they still can be dropped
drop user u1@h, u2@h, u3@h, u4@h, u5@h, u6@h, u7@h, u8@h;
#
# MDEV-14735 better matching order for grants
# MDEV-14732 mysql.db privileges evaluated on order of grants rather than hierarchically
# MDEV-8269 Correct fix for Bug #20181776 :- ACCESS CONTROL DOESN'T MATCH MOST SPECIFIC HOST WHEN IT CONTAINS WILDCARD
#
create database mysqltest_1;
create user twg@'%' identified by 'test';
create table mysqltest_1.t1(id int);
# MDEV-14732 test case
grant create, drop on `mysqltest_1%`.* to twg@'%';
grant all privileges on `mysqltest_1`.* to twg@'%';
connect conn1,localhost,twg,test,mysqltest_1;
insert into t1 values(1);
disconnect conn1;
connection default;
# prefix%suffix
revoke all privileges, grant option from twg@'%';
grant create, drop on `mysqlt%`.* to twg@'%';
grant all privileges on `mysqlt%1`.* to twg@'%';
connect conn1,localhost,twg,test,mysqltest_1;
insert into t1 values(1);
disconnect conn1;
connection default;
# more specific can even have a shorter prefix
revoke all privileges, grant option from twg@'%';
grant create, drop on `mysqlt%`.* to twg@'%';
grant all privileges on `%mysqltest_1`.* to twg@'%';
connect conn1,localhost,twg,test,mysqltest_1;
insert into t1 values(1);
disconnect conn1;
connection default;
drop database mysqltest_1;
drop user twg@'%';
......@@ -62,6 +62,12 @@
bool mysql_user_table_is_in_short_password_format= false;
bool using_global_priv_table= true;
// set that from field length in acl_load?
const uint max_hostname_length= 60;
const uint max_dbname_length= 64;
#include "sql_acl_getsort.ic"
static LEX_CSTRING native_password_plugin_name= {
STRING_WITH_LEN("mysql_native_password")
};
......@@ -117,7 +123,7 @@ static bool compare_hostname(const acl_host_and_ip *, const char *, const char *
class ACL_ACCESS {
public:
ulong sort;
ulonglong sort;
ulong access;
ACL_ACCESS()
:sort(0), access(0)
......@@ -284,7 +290,6 @@ ulong role_global_merges= 0, role_db_merges= 0, role_table_merges= 0,
#ifndef NO_EMBEDDED_ACCESS_CHECKS
static void update_hostname(acl_host_and_ip *host, const char *hostname);
static ulong get_sort(uint count,...);
static bool show_proxy_grants (THD *, const char *, const char *,
char *, size_t);
static bool show_role_grants(THD *, const char *, const char *,
......@@ -332,7 +337,8 @@ class ACL_PROXY_USER :public ACL_ACCESS
(proxied_host_arg && *proxied_host_arg) ?
proxied_host_arg : NULL);
with_grant= with_grant_arg;
sort= get_sort(4, host.hostname, user, proxied_host.hostname, proxied_user);
sort= get_magic_sort("huhu", host.hostname, user, proxied_host.hostname,
proxied_user);
}
void init(MEM_ROOT *mem, const char *host_arg, const char *user_arg,
......@@ -2344,7 +2350,7 @@ static bool acl_load(THD *thd, const Grant_tables& tables)
}
host.access= host_table.get_access();
host.access= fix_rights_for_db(host.access);
host.sort= get_sort(2, host.host.hostname, host.db);
host.sort= get_magic_sort("hd", host.host.hostname, host.db);
if (check_no_resolve && hostname_requires_resolving(host.host.hostname))
{
sql_print_warning("'host' entry '%s|%s' "
......@@ -2386,7 +2392,7 @@ static bool acl_load(THD *thd, const Grant_tables& tables)
user.access= user_table.get_access();
user.sort= get_sort(2, user.host.hostname, user.user.str);
user.sort= get_magic_sort("hu", user.host.hostname, user.user.str);
user.hostname_length= safe_strlen(user.host.hostname);
my_init_dynamic_array(&user.role_grants, sizeof(ACL_ROLE *), 0, 8, MYF(0));
......@@ -2505,7 +2511,7 @@ static bool acl_load(THD *thd, const Grant_tables& tables)
db.db, db.user, safe_str(db.host.hostname));
}
}
db.sort=get_sort(3,db.host.hostname,db.db,db.user);
db.sort=get_magic_sort("hdu", db.host.hostname, db.db, db.user);
#ifndef TO_BE_REMOVED
if (db_table.num_fields() <= 9)
{ // Without grant
......@@ -2753,49 +2759,6 @@ static ulong get_access(TABLE *form, uint fieldnr, uint *next_field)
}
/*
Return a number which, if sorted 'desc', puts strings in this order:
no wildcards
wildcards
empty string
*/
static ulong get_sort(uint count,...)
{
va_list args;
va_start(args,count);
ulong sort=0;
/* Should not use this function with more than 4 arguments for compare. */
DBUG_ASSERT(count <= 4);
while (count--)
{
char *start, *str= va_arg(args,char*);
uint chars= 0;
uint wild_pos= 0; /* first wildcard position */
if ((start= str))
{
for (; *str ; str++)
{
if (*str == wild_prefix && str[1])
str++;
else if (*str == wild_many || *str == wild_one)
{
wild_pos= (uint) (str - start) + 1;
break;
}
chars= 128; // Marker that chars existed
}
}
sort= (sort << 8) + (wild_pos ? MY_MIN(wild_pos, 127U) : chars);
}
va_end(args);
return sort;
}
static int acl_compare(const ACL_ACCESS *a, const ACL_ACCESS *b)
{
if (a->sort > b->sort)
......@@ -3157,7 +3120,7 @@ ACL_USER::ACL_USER(THD *thd, const LEX_USER &combo,
user= safe_lexcstrdup_root(&acl_memroot, combo.user);
update_hostname(&host, safe_strdup_root(&acl_memroot, combo.host.str));
hostname_length= combo.host.length;
sort= get_sort(2, host.hostname, user.str);
sort= get_magic_sort("hu", host.hostname, user.str);
password_last_changed= thd->query_start();
password_lifetime= -1;
my_init_dynamic_array(&role_grants, sizeof(ACL_USER *), 0, 8, MYF(0));
......@@ -3314,7 +3277,7 @@ static void acl_insert_db(const char *user, const char *host, const char *db,
update_hostname(&acl_db.host, safe_strdup_root(&acl_memroot, host));
acl_db.db=strdup_root(&acl_memroot,db);
acl_db.initial_access= acl_db.access= privileges;
acl_db.sort=get_sort(3,acl_db.host.hostname,acl_db.db,acl_db.user);
acl_db.sort=get_magic_sort("hdu", acl_db.host.hostname, acl_db.db, acl_db.user);
acl_dbs.push(acl_db);
rebuild_acl_dbs();
}
......@@ -5033,7 +4996,7 @@ class GRANT_NAME :public Sql_alloc
char *db, *user, *tname, *hash_key;
ulong privs;
ulong init_privs; /* privileges found in physical table */
ulong sort;
ulonglong sort;
size_t key_length;
GRANT_NAME(const char *h, const char *d,const char *u,
const char *t, ulong p, bool is_routine);
......@@ -5079,7 +5042,7 @@ void GRANT_NAME::set_user_details(const char *h, const char *d,
my_casedn_str(files_charset_info, db);
}
user = strdup_root(&grant_memroot,u);
sort= get_sort(3,host.hostname,db,user);
sort= get_magic_sort("hdu", host.hostname, db, user);
if (tname != t)
{
tname= strdup_root(&grant_memroot, t);
......@@ -5121,7 +5084,7 @@ GRANT_NAME::GRANT_NAME(TABLE *form, bool is_routine)
update_hostname(&host, hostname);
db= get_field(&grant_memroot,form->field[1]);
sort= get_sort(3, host.hostname, db, user);
sort= get_magic_sort("hdu", host.hostname, db, user);
tname= get_field(&grant_memroot,form->field[3]);
if (!db || !tname)
{
......@@ -6214,7 +6177,7 @@ static int update_role_db(int merged, int first, ulong access,
acl_db.db= acl_dbs.at(first).db;
acl_db.access= access;
acl_db.initial_access= 0;
acl_db.sort=get_sort(3, "", acl_db.db, role);
acl_db.sort= get_magic_sort("hdu", "", acl_db.db, role);
acl_dbs.push(acl_db);
return 2;
}
......
/* Copyright (c) 2019, MariaDB Corporation.
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1335 USA */
#ifndef NO_EMBEDDED_ACCESS_CHECKS
/*
Returns a number which, if sorted in descending order, magically puts
patterns in the order from most specific (e.g. no wildcards) to most generic
(e.g. "%"). That is, the larger the number, the more specific the pattern is.
Takes a template that lists types of following patterns (by the first letter
of _h_ostname, _d_bname, _u_sername) and up to four patterns.
No more than two can be of 'h' or 'd' type (because one magic value takes 26
bits, see below).
========================================================================
Here's how the magic is created:
Let's look at one iteration of the for() loop. That's one pattern. With
wildcards (usernames aren't interesting).
By definition a pattern A is "more specific" than pattern B if the set of
strings that match the pattern A is smaller than the set of strings that
match the pattern B. Strings are taken from the big superset of all valid
utf8 strings up to the maxlen.
Strings are matched character by character. For every non-wildcard
character there can be only one matching character in the matched string.
For a wild_one character ('_') any valid utf8 character will do. Below
numchars would mean a total number of vaid utf8 characters. It's a huge
number. A number of matching strings for wild_one will be numchars.
For a wild_many character ('%') any number of valid utf8 characters will do.
How many string will match it depends on the amount of non-wild_many
characters. Say, if a number of non-wildcard characters is N, and a number
of wild_one characters is M, and the number of wild_many characters is K,
then for K=1 its wild_many character will match any number of valid utf8
characters from 0 to L=maxlen-N-M. The number of matching strings will be
1 + numchars + numchars^2 + numchars^3 + ... + numchars^L
Intermediate result: if M=K=0, the pattern will match only one string,
if M>0, K=0, the pattern will match numchars^M strings, if K=1, the
pattern will match
numchars^M + 1 + numchars + numchars^2 + ... + numchars^L
For a more visual notation, let's write these huge numbers not as
decimal or binary, but base numchars. Then the last number will be
a sum of two numbers: the first is one followed by M zeros, the second
constists of L+1 ones:
1000{...M...}000 + 111{...L+1...}1111
This could produce any of the following
111...112111...1111 if L > M, K = 1
100...001111...1111 if M > L, K = 1
2111111...111111111 if M = L, K = 1
1111111...111111111 if M = 0, K = 1
1000000...000000000 if K = 0, M > 0
There are two complications caused by multiple wild_many characters.
For, say, two wild_many characters, either can accept any number of utf8
characters, as long the the total amount of them is less then or equal to L.
Same logic applies to any number of non-consequent wild_many characters
(consequent wild_many characters count as one). This gives the number of
matching strings of
1 + F(K,1)*numchars + F(K,2)*numchars^2 + ... + F(K,L)*numchars^L
where F(K,R) is the "number of ways one can put R balls into K boxes",
that is C^{K-1}_{R+K-1}.
In the "base numchars" notation, it means that besides 0, 1, and 2,
an R-th digit can be F(K,R). For the purpose of comparison, we only need
to know the most significant digit, F(K, L).
While it can be huge, we don't need the exact value, it's a
a monotonously increasing function of K, so if K1>K2, F(K1,L) > F(K2,L)
and we can simply compare values of K instead of complex F(K,L).
The second complication: F(K,R) gives only an upper boundary, the
actual number of matched strings can be smaller.
Example: pattern "a%b%c" can match "abbc" as a(b)b()c, and as a()b(b)c.
F(2,1) = 2, but it's only one string "abbc".
We'll ignore it here under assumption that it almost never happens
in practice and this simplification won't noticeably disrupt the ordering.
The last detail: old get_sort function sorted by the non-wildcard prefix
length, so in "abc_" and "a_bc" the former one was sorted first. Strictly
speaking they're both equally specific, but to preserve the backward
compatible sorting we'll use the P "prefix length or 0 if no wildcards"
to break ties.
Now, let's compare two long numbers. Numbers are easy to compare,
the longer number is larger. If they both have the same lengths,
the one with the larger first digit is larger, and so on.
But there is no need to actually calculate these numbers.
Three numbers L, K, M (and P to break ties) are enough to describe a pattern
for a purpose of comparison. L/K/M triplets can be compared like this:
* case 1: if for both patterns L>M: compare L, K, M, in that order
because:
- if L1 > L2, the first number is longer
- If L1 == L2, then the first digit is a monotonously increasing function
of K, so the first digit is larger when K is larger
- if K1 == K2, then all other digits in these numbers would be the
same too, with the exception of one digit in the middle that
got +1 because of +1000{...M...}000. So, whatever number has a
larger M will get this +1 first.
* case 2: if for both patterns L<M: compare M, L, K, in that order
* case 3: if for both patterns L=M: compare L (or M), K
* case 4: if one L1>M1, other L2=M2: compare L, K, M
* case 5: if one L1<M1, other L2=M2: compare M, L, K
* case 6: if one pattern L1>M1, the other M2>L2: first is more generic
unless (case 6a) K1=K2=1,M1=0,M2=L2+1 (in that case - equal)
note that in case 3 one can use a rule from the case either 1 or 2,
in the case 4 one can use the rule from the case 1,
in the case 5 one can use the rule from the case 2.
for the case 6 and ignoring the special case 6a, to compare patterns by a
magic number as a function z(a,b,c), we must ensure that z(L1,K1,M1) is
greater than z(M2,L2,K2) when L1=M2. This can be done by an extra bit,
which is 1 for K and 0 for L. Thus, the magic number could be
case 1: (((L*2 + 1)*(maxlen+1) + K)*(maxlen+1) + M)*(maxlen+1) + P
case 2: ((M*2*(maxlen+1) + L)*(maxlen+1) + K)*(maxlen+1) + P
upper bound: L<=maxlen, M<=maxlen, K<=maxlen/2, P<maxlen
for a current maxlen=64, the magic number needs 26 bits.
*/
static ulonglong get_magic_sort(const char *templ, ...)
{
ulonglong sort=0;
va_list args;
va_start(args, templ);
IF_DBUG(uint bits_used= 0,);
for (; *templ; templ++)
{
char *pat= va_arg(args, char*);
if (*templ == 'u')
{
/* Username. Can be empty (= anybody) or a literal. Encoded in one bit */
sort= (sort << 1) + !*pat;
IF_DBUG(bits_used++,);
continue;
}
/* A wildcard pattern. Encoded in 26 bits. */
uint maxlen= *templ == 'd' ? max_dbname_length : max_hostname_length;
DBUG_ASSERT(maxlen <= 64);
DBUG_ASSERT(*templ == 'd' || *templ == 'h');
uint N= 0, M= 0, K= 0, P= 0;
for (uint i=0; pat[i]; i++)
{
if (pat[i] == wild_many)
{
if (!K && !M) P= N;
K++;
while (pat[i+1] == wild_many) i++;
continue;
}
if (pat[i] == wild_one)
{
if (!K && !M) P= N;
M++;
continue;
}
if (pat[i] == wild_prefix && pat[i+1]) i++;
N++;
}
uint L= K ? maxlen - N - M : 0, d= maxlen + 1, magic;
if (L > M)
magic= (((L * 2 + 1) * d + K) * d + M) * d + P;
else
magic= (((M * 2 + 0) * d + L) * d + K) * d + P;
DBUG_ASSERT(magic < 1<<26);
sort= (sort << 26) + magic;
IF_DBUG(bits_used+= 26,);
}
DBUG_ASSERT(bits_used < 8*sizeof(sort));
va_end(args);
return ~sort;
}
#endif
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment