Commit 26af0b96 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

Bug#26827 - table->read_set is set incorrectly,

            causing update of a different column

Post-pushbuild fix.

bitmap_set_bit() is an inline function in DEBUG builds and
a macro in non-DEBUG builds. The latter evaluates its 'bit'
argument twice. So one must not use increment/decrement operators
on this argument.

Moved increment of pointer out of bitmap_set_bit() call.


include/my_bitmap.h:
  Bug#26827 - table->read_set is set incorrectly,
              causing update of a different column
  Added a warning comment.
sql/sql_partition.cc:
  Bug#26827 - table->read_set is set incorrectly,
              causing update of a different column
  Moved increment of pointer out of bitmap_set_bit() call.
parent 435df185
......@@ -103,6 +103,17 @@ extern void bitmap_lock_invert(MY_BITMAP *map);
&= ~ (1 << ((BIT) & 7)))
#define _bitmap_is_set(MAP, BIT) (uint) (((uchar*)(MAP)->bitmap)[(BIT) / 8] \
& (1 << ((BIT) & 7)))
/*
WARNING!
The below symbols are inline functions in DEBUG builds and macros in
non-DEBUG builds. The latter evaluate their 'bit' argument twice.
NEVER use an increment/decrement operator with the 'bit' argument.
It would work with DEBUG builds, but fails later in production builds!
FORBIDDEN: bitmap_set_bit($my_bitmap, (field++)->field_index);
*/
#ifndef DBUG_OFF
static inline void
bitmap_set_bit(MY_BITMAP *map,uint bit)
......
......@@ -606,8 +606,8 @@ static bool create_full_part_field_array(THD *thd, TABLE *table,
partitioning.
*/
if ((ptr= part_info->full_part_field_array))
while (*ptr)
bitmap_set_bit(&part_info->full_part_field_set, (*ptr++)->field_index);
for (; *ptr; ptr++)
bitmap_set_bit(&part_info->full_part_field_set, (*ptr)->field_index);
end:
DBUG_RETURN(result);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment