MDEV-15982: Incorrect results when subquery is materialized

fix_semijoin_strategies_for_picked_join_order() should set
join->sjm_lookup_tables to be a bitmap of tables inside
SJ-Materialization-Lookup nests.

mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2_mat.result

@@ -1658,3 +1658,54 @@ id
 12
 13
 drop table t1;
+#
+# MDEV-15982: Incorrect results when subquery is materialized
+#
+CREATE TABLE `t1` (`id` int(32)  NOT NULL  primary key);
+INSERT INTO `t1` VALUES
+(45), (46), (47), (48), (49), (50), (51), (52), (53), (54), (55), (56), (57), (58), (59), (60), (61), (62),
+(63), (64), (65), (66), (67), (68), (69), (70), (71), (72), (73), (74), (75), (76), (77), (78), (79), (80),
+(81), (82), (83), (84), (85), (86), (87), (88), (89), (90), (91), (92),(93),(94),(95),(96), (97), (98),
+(99), (100), (101), (102), (103), (104), (105), (106), (107), (108), (109), (110), (111), (112), (113),
+(114), (115), (116), (117), (118), (119), (120), (121), (122), (123), (124), (125), (126), (127), (128),
+(129), (130), (131), (132), (133), (134), (135), (136), (137), (138), (139), (140), (141), (142), (143), (144), (145), (146),
+(147), (148), (149), (150), (151), (152), (153), (154), (155), (156), (157), (158), (159), (160), (161),
+(162), (163), (164), (165), (166), (167), (168), (169), (170), (171), (172), (173),
+(174), (175), (176), (177), (178), (179), (180), (181), (182), (183), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (19), (35),
+(7), (20), (8), (36), (219), (22), (10), (23), (37), (11), (24);
+CREATE TABLE `t2` (`type` int , `id` int(32) NOT NULL  primary key);
+INSERT INTO `t2` VALUES
+(2,2),(2,3),(1,4),(2,5),(1,6),(1,19),(5,7),(1,20),(1,8),(1,21),(1,9),
+(1,22),(2,10),(1,23),(2,11),(1,24),(1,12),(1,25),(2,13),(2,26),(2,14),
+(2,27),(1,15),(1,28),(3,16),(1,29),(2,17),(1,30),(5,18),(2,1);
+CREATE TABLE `t3` (`ref_id`  int(32) unsigned ,`type` varchar(80),`id` int(32) NOT NULL );
+INSERT INTO `t3` VALUES
+(1,'incident',31),(2,'faux pas',32),
+(5,'oopsies',33),(3,'deniable',34),
+(11,'wasntme',35),(10,'wasntme',36),
+(17,'faux pas',37),(13,'unlikely',38),
+(13,'improbable',39),(14,'incident',40),
+(26,'problem',41),(14,'problem',42),
+(26,'incident',43),(27,'incident',44);
+explain
+SELECT t2.id FROM t2,t1
+WHERE  t2.id IN (SELECT t3.ref_id FROM t3,t1 where t3.id = t1.id) and t2.id = t1.id;
+id	select_type	table	type	possible_keys	key	key_len	ref	rows	Extra
+1	PRIMARY	t2	index	PRIMARY	PRIMARY	4	NULL	30	Using index
+1	PRIMARY	<subquery2>	eq_ref	distinct_key	distinct_key	4	func	1	Using where
+1	PRIMARY	t1	eq_ref	PRIMARY	PRIMARY	4	test.t2.id	1	Using index
+2	MATERIALIZED	t3	ALL	NULL	NULL	NULL	NULL	14	
+2	MATERIALIZED	t1	eq_ref	PRIMARY	PRIMARY	4	test.t3.id	1	Using index
+SELECT t2.id FROM t2,t1
+WHERE  t2.id IN (SELECT t3.ref_id FROM t3,t1 where t3.id = t1.id) and t2.id = t1.id;
+id
+10
+11
+set optimizer_switch='materialization=off';
+SELECT t2.id FROM t2,t1
+WHERE  t2.id IN (SELECT t3.ref_id FROM t3,t1 where t3.id = t1.id) and t2.id = t1.id;
+id
+11
+10
+set optimizer_switch='materialization=on';
+DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3;

mysql-test/t/subselect_sj2_mat.test

@@ -345,3 +345,52 @@ WHERE (
         (t.id IN (0,4,12,13,1,10,3,11))
 );
 drop table t1;
+--echo #
+--echo # MDEV-15982: Incorrect results when subquery is materialized
+--echo #
+
+CREATE TABLE `t1` (`id` int(32)  NOT NULL  primary key);
+INSERT INTO `t1` VALUES
+(45), (46), (47), (48), (49), (50), (51), (52), (53), (54), (55), (56), (57), (58), (59), (60), (61), (62),
+(63), (64), (65), (66), (67), (68), (69), (70), (71), (72), (73), (74), (75), (76), (77), (78), (79), (80),
+(81), (82), (83), (84), (85), (86), (87), (88), (89), (90), (91), (92),(93),(94),(95),(96), (97), (98),
+(99), (100), (101), (102), (103), (104), (105), (106), (107), (108), (109), (110), (111), (112), (113),
+(114), (115), (116), (117), (118), (119), (120), (121), (122), (123), (124), (125), (126), (127), (128),
+(129), (130), (131), (132), (133), (134), (135), (136), (137), (138), (139), (140), (141), (142), (143), (144), (145), (146),
+(147), (148), (149), (150), (151), (152), (153), (154), (155), (156), (157), (158), (159), (160), (161),
+(162), (163), (164), (165), (166), (167), (168), (169), (170), (171), (172), (173),
+(174), (175), (176), (177), (178), (179), (180), (181), (182), (183), (2), (3), (4), (5), (6), (19), (35),
+(7), (20), (8), (36), (219), (22), (10), (23), (37), (11), (24);
+
+CREATE TABLE `t2` (`type` int , `id` int(32) NOT NULL  primary key);
+INSERT INTO `t2` VALUES
+(2,2),(2,3),(1,4),(2,5),(1,6),(1,19),(5,7),(1,20),(1,8),(1,21),(1,9),
+(1,22),(2,10),(1,23),(2,11),(1,24),(1,12),(1,25),(2,13),(2,26),(2,14),
+(2,27),(1,15),(1,28),(3,16),(1,29),(2,17),(1,30),(5,18),(2,1);
+
+CREATE TABLE `t3` (`ref_id`  int(32) unsigned ,`type` varchar(80),`id` int(32) NOT NULL );
+INSERT INTO `t3` VALUES
+(1,'incident',31),(2,'faux pas',32),
+(5,'oopsies',33),(3,'deniable',34),
+(11,'wasntme',35),(10,'wasntme',36),
+(17,'faux pas',37),(13,'unlikely',38),
+(13,'improbable',39),(14,'incident',40),
+(26,'problem',41),(14,'problem',42),
+(26,'incident',43),(27,'incident',44);
+
+explain
+SELECT t2.id FROM t2,t1
+  WHERE  t2.id IN (SELECT t3.ref_id FROM t3,t1 where t3.id = t1.id) and t2.id = t1.id;
+
+SELECT t2.id FROM t2,t1
+  WHERE  t2.id IN (SELECT t3.ref_id FROM t3,t1 where t3.id = t1.id) and t2.id = t1.id;
+
+set optimizer_switch='materialization=off';
+
+SELECT t2.id FROM t2,t1
+  WHERE  t2.id IN (SELECT t3.ref_id FROM t3,t1 where t3.id = t1.id) and t2.id = t1.id;
+set optimizer_switch='materialization=on';
+
+DROP TABLE t1,t2,t3;
+
+

sql/opt_subselect.cc

@@ -3532,7 +3532,8 @@ void fix_semijoin_strategies_for_picked_join_order(JOIN *join)
       first= tablenr - sjm->tables + 1;
       join->best_positions[first].n_sj_tables= sjm->tables;
       join->best_positions[first].sj_strategy= SJ_OPT_MATERIALIZE;
-      join->sjm_lookup_tables|= s->table->map;
+      for (uint i= first; i < first+ sjm->tables; i++)
+        join->sjm_lookup_tables |= join->best_positions[i].table->table->map;
     }
     else if (pos->sj_strategy == SJ_OPT_MATERIALIZE_SCAN)
     {