Commit 476e056d authored by unknown's avatar unknown

Don't ignore SIGCHLD since that affects waitpid on some platforms

Fix spelling error
Move exit_code into local scope
parent c8bd3236
......@@ -89,7 +89,6 @@ static void die(const char* fmt, ...)
static void kill_child (void)
{
int exit_code= 1;
int status= 0;
message("Killing child: %d", child_pid);
......@@ -99,6 +98,7 @@ static void kill_child (void)
pid_t ret_pid= waitpid(child_pid, &status, 0);
if (ret_pid == child_pid)
{
int exit_code= 1;
if (WIFEXITED(status))
{
// Process has exited, collect return status
......@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ static void kill_child (void)
exit(exit_code);
}
exit(exit_code);
exit(1);
}
......@@ -122,13 +122,12 @@ static void handle_signal (int sig)
message("Got signal %d, child_pid: %d", sig, child_pid);
terminated= 1;
if (child_pid > 0)
kill_child();
// Ignore further signals
signal(SIGTERM, SIG_IGN);
signal(SIGINT, SIG_IGN);
signal(SIGCHLD, SIG_IGN);
if (child_pid > 0)
kill_child();
// Continune execution, allow the child to be started and
// finally terminated by monitor loop
......@@ -237,7 +236,7 @@ int main(int argc, char* const argv[] )
break;
}
// Check if child has exited, normally this wil be
// Check if child has exited, normally this will be
// detected immediately with SIGCHLD handler
int status= 0;
pid_t ret_pid= waitpid(child_pid, &status, WNOHANG);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment