Commit 4e9d7d6c authored by unknown's avatar unknown

Fix for BUG#20188 "REPLACE or ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE in

auto_increment breaks binlog":
if slave's table had a higher auto_increment counter than master's (even
though all rows of the two tables were identical), then in some cases,
REPLACE and INSERT ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE failed to replicate
statement-based (it inserted different values on slave from on master).
write_record() contained a "thd->next_insert_id=0" to force an adjustment
of thd->next_insert_id after the update or replacement. But it is this
assigment introduced indeterminism of the statement on the slave, thus
the bug. For ON DUPLICATE, we replace that assignment by a call to
handler::adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value() which is deterministic
(does not depend on slave table's autoinc counter). For REPLACE, this
assignment can simply be removed (as REPLACE can't insert a number larger
than thd->next_insert_id).
We also move a too early restore_auto_increment() down to when we really know
that we can restore the value.


mysql-test/r/rpl_insert_id.result:
  result update, without the bugfix, slave's "3 350" were "4 350".
mysql-test/t/rpl_insert_id.test:
  test for BUG#20188 "REPLACE or ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE in
  auto_increment breaks binlog".
  There is, in this order:
  - a test of the bug for the case of REPLACE
  - a test of basic ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE functionality which was not
  tested before
  - a test of the bug for the case of ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
sql/handler.cc:
  the adjustment of next_insert_id if inserting a big explicit value, is
  moved to a separate method to be used elsewhere.
sql/handler.h:
  see handler.cc
sql/sql_insert.cc:
  restore_auto_increment() means "I know I won't use this autogenerated
  autoincrement value, you are free to reuse it for next row". But we were
  calling restore_auto_increment() in the case of REPLACE: if write_row() fails
  inserting the row, we don't know that we won't use the value, as we are going to
  try again by doing internally an UPDATE of the existing row, or a DELETE
  of the existing row and then an INSERT. So I move restore_auto_increment()
  further down, when we know for sure we failed all possibilities for the row.
  Additionally, in case of REPLACE, we don't need to reset THD::next_insert_id:
  the value of thd->next_insert_id will be suitable for the next row.
  In case of ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE, resetting thd->next_insert_id is also
  wrong (breaks statement-based binlog), but cannot simply be removed, as
  thd->next_insert_id must be adjusted if the explicit value exceeds it.
  We now do the adjustment by calling
  handler::adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value() (which, contrary to
  thd->next_insert_id=0, does not depend on the slave table's autoinc counter,
  and so is deterministic).
parent 57e7bc55
......@@ -132,3 +132,68 @@ id last_id
drop function bug15728;
drop function bug15728_insert;
drop table t1, t2;
create table t1 (n int primary key auto_increment not null,
b int, unique(b));
set sql_log_bin=0;
insert into t1 values(null,100);
replace into t1 values(null,50),(null,100),(null,150);
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
2 50
3 100
4 150
truncate table t1;
set sql_log_bin=1;
insert into t1 values(null,100);
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
1 100
insert into t1 values(null,200),(null,300);
delete from t1 where b <> 100;
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
1 100
replace into t1 values(null,100),(null,350);
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
2 100
3 350
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
2 100
3 350
insert into t1 values (NULL,400),(3,500),(NULL,600) on duplicate key UPDATE n=1000;
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
2 100
4 400
1000 350
1001 600
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
2 100
4 400
1000 350
1001 600
drop table t1;
create table t1 (n int primary key auto_increment not null,
b int, unique(b));
insert into t1 values(null,100);
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
1 100
insert into t1 values(null,200),(null,300);
delete from t1 where b <> 100;
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
1 100
insert into t1 values(null,100),(null,350) on duplicate key update n=2;
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
2 100
3 350
select * from t1 order by n;
n b
2 100
3 350
drop table t1;
......@@ -147,6 +147,69 @@ drop function bug15728;
drop function bug15728_insert;
drop table t1, t2;
# test of BUG#20188 REPLACE or ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE in
# auto_increment breaks binlog
create table t1 (n int primary key auto_increment not null,
b int, unique(b));
# First, test that we do not call restore_auto_increment() too early
# in write_record():
set sql_log_bin=0;
insert into t1 values(null,100);
replace into t1 values(null,50),(null,100),(null,150);
select * from t1 order by n;
truncate table t1;
set sql_log_bin=1;
insert into t1 values(null,100);
select * from t1 order by n;
sync_slave_with_master;
# make slave's table autoinc counter bigger
insert into t1 values(null,200),(null,300);
delete from t1 where b <> 100;
# check that slave's table content is identical to master
select * from t1 order by n;
# only the auto_inc counter differs.
connection master;
replace into t1 values(null,100),(null,350);
select * from t1 order by n;
sync_slave_with_master;
select * from t1 order by n;
# Same test as for REPLACE, but for ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE
# We first check that if we update a row using a value larger than the
# table's counter, the counter for next row is bigger than the
# after-value of the updated row.
connection master;
insert into t1 values (NULL,400),(3,500),(NULL,600) on duplicate key UPDATE n=1000;
select * from t1 order by n;
sync_slave_with_master;
select * from t1 order by n;
# and now test for the bug:
connection master;
drop table t1;
create table t1 (n int primary key auto_increment not null,
b int, unique(b));
insert into t1 values(null,100);
select * from t1 order by n;
sync_slave_with_master;
insert into t1 values(null,200),(null,300);
delete from t1 where b <> 100;
select * from t1 order by n;
connection master;
insert into t1 values(null,100),(null,350) on duplicate key update n=2;
select * from t1 order by n;
sync_slave_with_master;
select * from t1 order by n;
connection master;
drop table t1;
# End of 5.0 tests
sync_slave_with_master;
......@@ -1471,6 +1471,26 @@ next_insert_id(ulonglong nr,struct system_variables *variables)
}
void handler::adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value(ulonglong nr)
{
/*
If we have set THD::next_insert_id previously and plan to insert an
explicitely-specified value larger than this, we need to increase
THD::next_insert_id to be greater than the explicit value.
*/
THD *thd= table->in_use;
if (thd->clear_next_insert_id && (nr >= thd->next_insert_id))
{
if (thd->variables.auto_increment_increment != 1)
nr= next_insert_id(nr, &thd->variables);
else
nr++;
thd->next_insert_id= nr;
DBUG_PRINT("info",("next_insert_id: %lu", (ulong) nr));
}
}
/*
Update the auto_increment field if necessary
......@@ -1547,17 +1567,7 @@ bool handler::update_auto_increment()
/* Clear flag for next row */
/* Mark that we didn't generate a new value **/
auto_increment_column_changed=0;
/* Update next_insert_id if we have already generated a value */
if (thd->clear_next_insert_id && nr >= thd->next_insert_id)
{
if (variables->auto_increment_increment != 1)
nr= next_insert_id(nr, variables);
else
nr++;
thd->next_insert_id= nr;
DBUG_PRINT("info",("next_insert_id: %lu", (ulong) nr));
}
adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value(nr);
DBUG_RETURN(0);
}
if (!(nr= thd->next_insert_id))
......
......@@ -563,6 +563,7 @@ class handler :public Sql_alloc
{}
virtual ~handler(void) { /* TODO: DBUG_ASSERT(inited == NONE); */ }
int ha_open(const char *name, int mode, int test_if_locked);
void adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value(ulonglong nr);
bool update_auto_increment();
virtual void print_error(int error, myf errflag);
virtual bool get_error_message(int error, String *buf);
......
......@@ -955,7 +955,6 @@ int write_record(THD *thd, TABLE *table,COPY_INFO *info)
uint key_nr;
if (error != HA_WRITE_SKIP)
goto err;
table->file->restore_auto_increment();
if ((int) (key_nr = table->file->get_dup_key(error)) < 0)
{
error=HA_WRITE_SKIP; /* Database can't find key */
......@@ -1028,20 +1027,20 @@ int write_record(THD *thd, TABLE *table,COPY_INFO *info)
if (res == VIEW_CHECK_ERROR)
goto before_trg_err;
if (thd->clear_next_insert_id)
{
/* Reset auto-increment cacheing if we do an update */
thd->clear_next_insert_id= 0;
thd->next_insert_id= 0;
}
if ((error=table->file->update_row(table->record[1],table->record[0])))
{
if ((error == HA_ERR_FOUND_DUPP_KEY) && info->ignore)
{
table->file->restore_auto_increment();
goto ok_or_after_trg_err;
}
goto err;
}
info->updated++;
if (table->next_number_field)
table->file->adjust_next_insert_id_after_explicit_value(table->next_number_field->val_int());
trg_error= (table->triggers &&
table->triggers->process_triggers(thd, TRG_EVENT_UPDATE,
TRG_ACTION_AFTER, TRUE));
......@@ -1067,12 +1066,6 @@ int write_record(THD *thd, TABLE *table,COPY_INFO *info)
table->triggers->process_triggers(thd, TRG_EVENT_UPDATE,
TRG_ACTION_BEFORE, TRUE))
goto before_trg_err;
if (thd->clear_next_insert_id)
{
/* Reset auto-increment cacheing if we do an update */
thd->clear_next_insert_id= 0;
thd->next_insert_id= 0;
}
if ((error=table->file->update_row(table->record[1],
table->record[0])))
goto err;
......@@ -1142,6 +1135,7 @@ int write_record(THD *thd, TABLE *table,COPY_INFO *info)
table->file->print_error(error,MYF(0));
before_trg_err:
table->file->restore_auto_increment();
if (key)
my_safe_afree(key, table->s->max_unique_length, MAX_KEY_LENGTH);
DBUG_RETURN(1);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment