Bug#58199 name_const in the having clause crashes
NAME_CONST(..) was used wrongly in a HAVING clause, and should have caused a user error. Instead, it caused a segmentation fault. During parsing, the value parameter to NAME_CONST was specified to be an uninitialized Item_ref object (it would be resolved later). During the semantic analysis, the object is tested, and since it was not initialied, the server seg.faulted. The fix is to check if the object is initialized before testing it. The same pattern has already been applied to most other methods in the Item_ref class. Bug was introduced by the optimization done as part of Bug#33546.
Showing
Please register or sign in to comment