Commit 7cc332b7 authored by Vladislav Vaintroub's avatar Vladislav Vaintroub

MDEV-33046 - delete unnecessary synchronization with dict_stats_mutex

Timer has internal synchronization, so that calling
set_time concurrently is not a problem.
parent a3dd7ea0
......@@ -411,7 +411,6 @@ static bool dict_stats_process_entry_from_recalc_pool()
}
static tpool::timer* dict_stats_timer;
static std::mutex dict_stats_mutex;
static void dict_stats_func(void*)
{
......@@ -422,26 +421,15 @@ static void dict_stats_func(void*)
void dict_stats_start()
{
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lk(dict_stats_mutex);
if (!dict_stats_timer)
dict_stats_timer= srv_thread_pool->create_timer(dict_stats_func);
DBUG_ASSERT(!dict_stats_timer);
dict_stats_timer= srv_thread_pool->create_timer(dict_stats_func);
}
static void dict_stats_schedule(int ms)
{
std::unique_lock<std::mutex> lk(dict_stats_mutex, std::defer_lock);
/*
Use try_lock() to avoid deadlock in dict_stats_shutdown(), which
uses dict_stats_mutex too. If there is simultaneous timer reschedule,
the first one will win, which is fine.
*/
if (!lk.try_lock())
{
return;
}
if (dict_stats_timer)
dict_stats_timer->set_time(ms,0);
DBUG_ASSERT(dict_stats_timer);
dict_stats_timer->set_time(ms,0);
}
void dict_stats_schedule_now()
......@@ -452,7 +440,6 @@ void dict_stats_schedule_now()
/** Shut down the dict_stats_thread. */
void dict_stats_shutdown()
{
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lk(dict_stats_mutex);
delete dict_stats_timer;
dict_stats_timer= 0;
}
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment