Fixed a typo that caused a wrong calculation of the selectivity for

pushed down condtions. 

mysql-test/r/selectivity.result

@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ id	select_type	table	type	possible_keys	key	key_len	ref	rows	filtered	Extra
 1	PRIMARY	<subquery2>	eq_ref	distinct_key	distinct_key	4	func	1	100.00	
 2	MATERIALIZED	part	ALL	PRIMARY	NULL	NULL	NULL	200	4.17	Using where
 2	MATERIALIZED	partsupp	ref	PRIMARY,i_ps_partkey,i_ps_suppkey	PRIMARY	4	dbt3_s001.part.p_partkey	3	100.00	Using where
-4	DEPENDENT SUBQUERY	lineitem	ref	i_l_shipdate,i_l_suppkey_partkey,i_l_partkey,i_l_suppkey	i_l_suppkey_partkey	10	dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_partkey,dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_suppkey	8	100.00	Using where
+4	DEPENDENT SUBQUERY	lineitem	ref	i_l_shipdate,i_l_suppkey_partkey,i_l_partkey,i_l_suppkey	i_l_suppkey_partkey	10	dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_partkey,dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_suppkey	8	15.14	Using where
 Warnings:
 Note	1276	Field or reference 'dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_partkey' of SELECT #4 was resolved in SELECT #2
 Note	1276	Field or reference 'dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_suppkey' of SELECT #4 was resolved in SELECT #2

mysql-test/r/selectivity_innodb.result

@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ id	select_type	table	type	possible_keys	key	key_len	ref	rows	filtered	Extra
 1	PRIMARY	<subquery2>	eq_ref	distinct_key	distinct_key	4	func	1	100.00	
 2	MATERIALIZED	part	ALL	PRIMARY	NULL	NULL	NULL	200	4.17	Using where
 2	MATERIALIZED	partsupp	ref	PRIMARY,i_ps_partkey,i_ps_suppkey	PRIMARY	4	dbt3_s001.part.p_partkey	3	100.00	Using where
-4	DEPENDENT SUBQUERY	lineitem	ref	i_l_shipdate,i_l_suppkey_partkey,i_l_partkey,i_l_suppkey	i_l_suppkey_partkey	10	dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_partkey,dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_suppkey	8	100.00	Using where
+4	DEPENDENT SUBQUERY	lineitem	ref	i_l_shipdate,i_l_suppkey_partkey,i_l_partkey,i_l_suppkey	i_l_suppkey_partkey	10	dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_partkey,dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_suppkey	8	14.37	Using where
 Warnings:
 Note	1276	Field or reference 'dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_partkey' of SELECT #4 was resolved in SELECT #2
 Note	1276	Field or reference 'dbt3_s001.partsupp.ps_suppkey' of SELECT #4 was resolved in SELECT #2

sql/sql_select.cc

@@ -6989,7 +6989,7 @@ double table_cond_selectivity(JOIN *join, uint idx, JOIN_TAB *s,
   if (s->quick && s->quick->index != MAX_KEY)
   {
     /* A range scan by index s->quick->index is used to access table s */
-    sel*= table_records/table->quick_rows[s->quick->index];
+    sel*= table->quick_rows[s->quick->index]/table_records;
   }
   else if (ref)
   {