MDEV-34718: Trigger doesn't work correctly with bulk update
Running an UPDATE statement in PS mode and having positional parameter(s) bound with an array of actual values (that is prepared to be run in bulk mode) results in incorrect behaviour in presence of on update trigger that also executes an UPDATE statement. The same is true for handling a DELETE statement in presence of on delete trigger. Typically, the visible effect of such incorrect behaviour is expressed in a wrong number of updated/deleted rows of a target table. Additionally, in case UPDATE statement, a number of modified rows and a state message returned by a statement contains wrong information about a number of modified rows. The reason for incorrect number of updated/deleted rows is that a data structure used for binding positional argument with its actual values is stored in THD (this is thd->bulk_param) and reused on processing every INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statement. It leads to consuming actual values bound with top-level UPDATE/DELETE statement by other DML statements used by triggers' body. To fix the issue, reset the thd->bulk_param temporary to the value nullptr before invoking triggers and restore its value on finishing its execution. The second part of the problem relating with wrong value of affected rows reported by Connector/C API is caused by the fact that diagnostics area is reused by an original DML statement and a statement invoked by a trigger. This fact should be take into account on finalizing a state of diagnostics area on completion running of a statement. Important remark: in case the macros DBUG_OFF is on, call of the method Diagnostics_area::reset_diagnostics_area() results in reset of the data members m_affected_rows, m_statement_warn_count. Values of these data members of the class Diagnostics_area are used on sending OK and EOF messages. In case DML statement is executed in PS bulk mode such resetting results in sending wrong result values to a client for affected rows in case the DML statement fires a triggers. So, reset these data members only in case the current statement being processed is not run in bulk mode.
Showing
This diff is collapsed.
Please register or sign in to comment