Commit d5023070 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

Merge mysql.com:/home/timka/mysql/src/4.1-dbg

into mysql.com:/home/timka/mysql/src/4.1-bug-8023

parents 876b4a59 6fd984d5
......@@ -67,3 +67,12 @@ SELECT * FROM t1;
id id2
3 0
DROP TABLE t1;
create table t1 (a integer);
insert into t1 values (1);
select 1 as a from t1 union all select 1 from dual limit 1;
a
1
(select 1 as a from t1) union all (select 1 from dual) limit 1;
a
1
drop table t1;
......@@ -49,3 +49,13 @@ SELECT * FROM t1;
DELETE FROM t1 WHERE id2 = 0 ORDER BY id desc LIMIT 1;
SELECT * FROM t1;
DROP TABLE t1;
#
# Bug#8023 - limit on UNION with from DUAL, causes syntax error
#
create table t1 (a integer);
insert into t1 values (1);
# both queries must return one row
select 1 as a from t1 union all select 1 from dual limit 1;
(select 1 as a from t1) union all (select 1 from dual) limit 1;
drop table t1;
......@@ -2455,10 +2455,11 @@ select_into:
select_from:
FROM join_table_list where_clause group_clause having_clause
opt_order_clause opt_limit_clause procedure_clause
| FROM DUAL_SYM /* oracle compatibility: oracle always requires FROM
clause, and DUAL is system table without fields.
Is "SELECT 1 FROM DUAL" any better than
"SELECT 1" ? Hmmm :) */
| FROM DUAL_SYM opt_limit_clause
/* oracle compatibility: oracle always requires FROM clause,
and DUAL is system table without fields.
Is "SELECT 1 FROM DUAL" any better than "SELECT 1" ?
Hmmm :) */
;
select_options:
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment