Commit f41f9e36 authored by unknown's avatar unknown

Fixed LP bug #609121

The bug was a result of missing logic to handle the case
when there are 'expensive' predicates that are not evaluated
during constant table optimization. Such is the case for
the IN predicate, which is considered expensive if it is
computed via materialization. In general this bug can be
triggered with any expensive predicate instead of IN.

When FALSE constant predicates are not evaluated during constant
optimization, the execution path changes so that instead of
setting JOIN::zero_result_cause after make_join_select, and
exiting JOIN::exec via the call to return_zero_rows(), execution
ends in JOIN::exec in the branch:
if (join->tables == join->const_tables)
{
  ...
  else if (join->send_row_on_empty_set())
     ...
     rc= join->result->send_data(*columns_list);
}
Unlike return_zero_rows(), this branch didn't evaluate the
having clause of the query.

The patch adds a call to evaluate the HAVING clause of a query even
when all tables are constant, because even for an empty result set
some aggregate functions may produce a NULL value.
parent 8cbaf90c
...@@ -1272,3 +1272,28 @@ a a in (select a from t1) ...@@ -1272,3 +1272,28 @@ a a in (select a from t1)
1 0 1 0
2 0 2 0
drop table t0, t1; drop table t0, t1;
#
# LPBUG#609121: RQG: wrong result on aggregate + NOT IN + HAVING and
# partial_match_table_scan=on
#
create table t1 (c1 int);
create table t2 (c2 int);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
set @@optimizer_switch='semijoin=off';
EXPLAIN
SELECT SUM(c1) c1_sum FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c2 FROM t2);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 PRIMARY t1 system NULL NULL NULL NULL 1
2 SUBQUERY t2 system NULL NULL NULL NULL 1
SELECT SUM(c1) c1_sum FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c2 FROM t2);
c1_sum
NULL
EXPLAIN
SELECT SUM(c1) c1_sum FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c2 FROM t2) HAVING c1_sum;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 PRIMARY t1 system NULL NULL NULL NULL 1
2 SUBQUERY t2 system NULL NULL NULL NULL 1
SELECT SUM(c1) c1_sum FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c2 FROM t2) HAVING c1_sum;
c1_sum
drop table t1, t2;
...@@ -921,3 +921,25 @@ execute s; ...@@ -921,3 +921,25 @@ execute s;
update t1 set a=123; update t1 set a=123;
execute s; execute s;
drop table t0, t1; drop table t0, t1;
--echo #
--echo # LPBUG#609121: RQG: wrong result on aggregate + NOT IN + HAVING and
--echo # partial_match_table_scan=on
--echo #
create table t1 (c1 int);
create table t2 (c2 int);
insert into t1 values (1);
insert into t2 values (2);
set @@optimizer_switch='semijoin=off';
EXPLAIN
SELECT SUM(c1) c1_sum FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c2 FROM t2);
SELECT SUM(c1) c1_sum FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c2 FROM t2);
EXPLAIN
SELECT SUM(c1) c1_sum FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c2 FROM t2) HAVING c1_sum;
SELECT SUM(c1) c1_sum FROM t1 WHERE c1 IN (SELECT c2 FROM t2) HAVING c1_sum;
drop table t1, t2;
...@@ -1722,7 +1722,8 @@ class JOIN :public Sql_alloc ...@@ -1722,7 +1722,8 @@ class JOIN :public Sql_alloc
bool send_row_on_empty_set() bool send_row_on_empty_set()
{ {
return (do_send_rows && tmp_table_param.sum_func_count != 0 && return (do_send_rows && tmp_table_param.sum_func_count != 0 &&
!group_list && having_value != Item::COND_FALSE); !group_list && having_value != Item::COND_FALSE &&
(!having || having->val_int()));
} }
bool change_result(select_result *result); bool change_result(select_result *result);
bool is_top_level_join() const bool is_top_level_join() const
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment