Commit f81eef62 authored by Sergei Petrunia's avatar Sergei Petrunia

MDEV-24117: Memory management problem in statistics state for ... IN

Part#1: Revert the patch that caused it:

commit 291be494
Author: Igor Babaev <igor@askmonty.org>
Date:   Thu Sep 24 22:02:00 2020 -0700

    MDEV-23811: With large number of indexes optimizer chooses an inefficient plan
parent 2845b656
......@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE
5 <= a AND b = 3 OR
3 <= a;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range a a 5 NULL 3 Using where; Using index
1 SIMPLE t1 range a a 5 NULL 4 Using where; Using index
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE
3 <= a AND a <= 5 OR
5 <= a AND b = 3 OR
......@@ -3054,77 +3054,5 @@ a b
set eq_range_index_dive_limit=default;
drop table t1;
#
# MDEV-23811: Both disjunct of WHERE condition contain range conditions
# for the same index such that the second range condition
# fully covers the first one. Additionally one of the disjuncts
# contains a range condition for the other index.
#
create table t1 (
pk int primary key auto_increment, a int, b int,
index idx1(a), index idx2(b)
);
insert into t1(a,b) values
(5,50), (1,10), (3,30), (7,70), (8,80), (4,40), (2,20), (6,60);
insert into t1(a,b) select a+10, b+100 from t1;
insert into t1(a,b) select a+20, b+200 from t1;
insert into t1(a,b) select a+30, b+300 from t1;
insert into t1(a,b) select a,b from t1;
analyze table t1;
Table Op Msg_type Msg_text
test.t1 analyze status OK
explain select * from t1 where ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100) or (a between 2 and 5);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range idx1,idx2 idx1 5 NULL 11 Using index condition; Using where
select * from t1 where ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100) or (a between 2 and 5);
pk a b
7 2 20
71 2 20
3 3 30
67 3 30
6 4 40
70 4 40
1 5 50
65 5 50
explain select * from t1 where (a between 2 and 5) or ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range idx1,idx2 idx1 5 NULL 11 Using index condition; Using where
select * from t1 where (a between 2 and 5) or ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100);
pk a b
7 2 20
71 2 20
3 3 30
67 3 30
6 4 40
70 4 40
1 5 50
65 5 50
explain select * from t1 where (a between 3 and 4) or ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range idx1,idx2 idx1 5 NULL 11 Using index condition; Using where
select * from t1 where (a between 3 and 4) or ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100);
pk a b
7 2 20
71 2 20
3 3 30
67 3 30
6 4 40
70 4 40
1 5 50
65 5 50
explain select * from t1 where ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100) or (a between 3 and 4);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range idx1,idx2 idx1 5 NULL 11 Using index condition; Using where
select * from t1 where ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100) or (a between 3 and 4);
pk a b
7 2 20
71 2 20
3 3 30
67 3 30
6 4 40
70 4 40
1 5 50
65 5 50
drop table t1;
#
# End of 10.2 tests
#
......@@ -1276,7 +1276,7 @@ SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE
5 <= a AND b = 3 OR
3 <= a;
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range a a 5 NULL 3 Using where; Using index
1 SIMPLE t1 range a a 5 NULL 4 Using where; Using index
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE
3 <= a AND a <= 5 OR
5 <= a AND b = 3 OR
......@@ -3066,78 +3066,6 @@ a b
set eq_range_index_dive_limit=default;
drop table t1;
#
# MDEV-23811: Both disjunct of WHERE condition contain range conditions
# for the same index such that the second range condition
# fully covers the first one. Additionally one of the disjuncts
# contains a range condition for the other index.
#
create table t1 (
pk int primary key auto_increment, a int, b int,
index idx1(a), index idx2(b)
);
insert into t1(a,b) values
(5,50), (1,10), (3,30), (7,70), (8,80), (4,40), (2,20), (6,60);
insert into t1(a,b) select a+10, b+100 from t1;
insert into t1(a,b) select a+20, b+200 from t1;
insert into t1(a,b) select a+30, b+300 from t1;
insert into t1(a,b) select a,b from t1;
analyze table t1;
Table Op Msg_type Msg_text
test.t1 analyze status OK
explain select * from t1 where ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100) or (a between 2 and 5);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range idx1,idx2 idx1 5 NULL 11 Using index condition; Using where; Rowid-ordered scan
select * from t1 where ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100) or (a between 2 and 5);
pk a b
1 5 50
3 3 30
6 4 40
7 2 20
65 5 50
67 3 30
70 4 40
71 2 20
explain select * from t1 where (a between 2 and 5) or ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range idx1,idx2 idx1 5 NULL 11 Using index condition; Using where; Rowid-ordered scan
select * from t1 where (a between 2 and 5) or ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100);
pk a b
1 5 50
3 3 30
6 4 40
7 2 20
65 5 50
67 3 30
70 4 40
71 2 20
explain select * from t1 where (a between 3 and 4) or ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range idx1,idx2 idx1 5 NULL 11 Using index condition; Using where; Rowid-ordered scan
select * from t1 where (a between 3 and 4) or ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100);
pk a b
1 5 50
3 3 30
6 4 40
7 2 20
65 5 50
67 3 30
70 4 40
71 2 20
explain select * from t1 where ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100) or (a between 3 and 4);
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE t1 range idx1,idx2 idx1 5 NULL 11 Using index condition; Using where; Rowid-ordered scan
select * from t1 where ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100) or (a between 3 and 4);
pk a b
1 5 50
3 3 30
6 4 40
7 2 20
65 5 50
67 3 30
70 4 40
71 2 20
drop table t1;
#
# End of 10.2 tests
#
set optimizer_switch=@mrr_icp_extra_tmp;
......@@ -369,7 +369,7 @@ WHERE ((ID < 200) AND (Name LIKE 'Ha%' OR (Country > 'A' AND Country < 'ARG')))
OR ((ID BETWEEN 100 AND 200) AND
(Name LIKE 'Pa%' OR (Population > 103000 AND Population < 104000)));
id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra
1 SIMPLE City range PRIMARY,Population,Country,Name PRIMARY 4 NULL 200 Using where
1 SIMPLE City index_merge PRIMARY,Population,Country,Name Name,Population,PRIMARY 39,4,4 NULL 307 Using sort_union(Name,Population,PRIMARY); Using where
SELECT * FROM City USE INDEX ()
WHERE ((ID < 10) AND (Name LIKE 'H%' OR (Country > 'A' AND Country < 'ARG')))
OR ((ID BETWEEN 100 AND 110) AND
......
......@@ -2095,48 +2095,6 @@ set eq_range_index_dive_limit=default;
drop table t1;
--echo #
--echo # MDEV-23811: Both disjunct of WHERE condition contain range conditions
--echo # for the same index such that the second range condition
--echo # fully covers the first one. Additionally one of the disjuncts
--echo # contains a range condition for the other index.
--echo #
create table t1 (
pk int primary key auto_increment, a int, b int,
index idx1(a), index idx2(b)
);
insert into t1(a,b) values
(5,50), (1,10), (3,30), (7,70), (8,80), (4,40), (2,20), (6,60);
insert into t1(a,b) select a+10, b+100 from t1;
insert into t1(a,b) select a+20, b+200 from t1;
insert into t1(a,b) select a+30, b+300 from t1;
insert into t1(a,b) select a,b from t1;
analyze table t1;
let $q1=
select * from t1 where ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100) or (a between 2 and 5);
eval explain $q1;
eval $q1;
let $q2=
select * from t1 where (a between 2 and 5) or ((a between 3 and 4) and b < 100);
eval explain $q2;
eval $q2;
let $q3=
select * from t1 where (a between 3 and 4) or ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100);
eval explain $q3;
eval $q3;
let $q4=
select * from t1 where ((a between 2 and 5) and b < 100) or (a between 3 and 4);
eval explain $q4;
eval $q4;
drop table t1;
--echo #
--echo # End of 10.2 tests
--echo #
......
......@@ -1852,9 +1852,6 @@ SEL_ARG::SEL_ARG(SEL_ARG &arg) :Sql_alloc()
next_key_part=arg.next_key_part;
max_part_no= arg.max_part_no;
use_count=1; elements=1;
next= 0;
if (next_key_part)
++next_key_part->use_count;
}
......@@ -8872,15 +8869,9 @@ tree_or(RANGE_OPT_PARAM *param,SEL_TREE *tree1,SEL_TREE *tree2)
}
bool no_imerge_from_ranges= FALSE;
SEL_TREE *rt1= tree1;
SEL_TREE *rt2= tree2;
/* Build the range part of the tree for the formula (1) */
if (sel_trees_can_be_ored(param, tree1, tree2, &ored_keys))
{
if (no_merges1)
rt1= new SEL_TREE(tree1, TRUE, param);
if (no_merges2)
rt2= new SEL_TREE(tree2, TRUE, param);
bool must_be_ored= sel_trees_must_be_ored(param, tree1, tree2, ored_keys);
no_imerge_from_ranges= must_be_ored;
......@@ -8938,6 +8929,12 @@ tree_or(RANGE_OPT_PARAM *param,SEL_TREE *tree1,SEL_TREE *tree2)
else if (!no_ranges1 && !no_ranges2 && !no_imerge_from_ranges)
{
/* Build the imerge part of the tree for the formula (1) */
SEL_TREE *rt1= tree1;
SEL_TREE *rt2= tree2;
if (no_merges1)
rt1= new SEL_TREE(tree1, TRUE, param);
if (no_merges2)
rt2= new SEL_TREE(tree2, TRUE, param);
if (!rt1 || !rt2 ||
result->merges.push_back(imerge_from_ranges) ||
imerge_from_ranges->or_sel_tree(param, rt1) ||
......@@ -9600,11 +9597,10 @@ key_or(RANGE_OPT_PARAM *param, SEL_ARG *key1,SEL_ARG *key2)
if (!tmp->next_key_part)
{
SEL_ARG *key2_next= key2->next;
if (key2->use_count)
{
SEL_ARG *key2_cpy= new SEL_ARG(*key2);
if (!key2_cpy)
if (key2_cpy)
return 0;
key2= key2_cpy;
}
......@@ -9625,7 +9621,7 @@ key_or(RANGE_OPT_PARAM *param, SEL_ARG *key1,SEL_ARG *key2)
Move on to next range in key2
*/
key2->increment_use_count(-1); // Free not used tree
key2=key2_next;
key2=key2->next;
continue;
}
else
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment