1. 03 Sep, 2007 5 commits
  2. 30 Aug, 2007 5 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-base · 3f9be28c
      unknown authored
      into  weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-runtime
      
      
      sql/item_cmpfunc.h:
        Auto merged
      sql/sql_lex.cc:
        Auto merged
      3f9be28c
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#28587 SELECT is blocked by INSERT waiting on read lock, even with low_priority_updates · bccbd5c4
      unknown authored
      The problem is that a SELECT on one thread is blocked by INSERT ... ON
      DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE on another thread even when low_priority_updates is
      activated.
      
      The solution is to possibly downgrade the lock type to the setting of
      low_priority_updates if the INSERT cannot be concurrent.
      
      
      sql/sql_insert.cc:
        Possibly downgrade lock type to the the setting of low_priority_updates if
        if the INSERT cannot be concurrent.
      bccbd5c4
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge malff@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-runtime · 672c421b
      unknown authored
      into  weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-28779-b
      
      
      672c421b
    • unknown's avatar
      Use double quotes instead of single ones which make the test fail on Windows.... · aef135da
      unknown authored
      Use double quotes instead of single ones which make the test fail on Windows. This is for bug #30164.
      
      
      mysql-test/t/mysql.test:
        Use double quotes instead of single ones which make the test fail on Windows.
      aef135da
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug #30164: Using client side macro inside server side comments generates broken queries · bb986a24
      unknown authored
        
      Problem:
        
      In cases when a client-side macro appears inside a server-side comment, the add_line() function in mysql.cc discarded all characters until the next delimiter to remove macro arguments from the query string. This resulted in broken queries being sent to the server when the next delimiter character appeared past the comment's boundaries, because the comment closing sequence ('*/') was discarded.
        
      Fix:
        
      If a client-side macro appears inside a server-side comment, discard all characters in the comment after the macro (that is, until the end of the comment rather than the next delimiter).
      This is a minimal fix to allow only simple cases used by the mysqlbinlog utility. Limitations that are worth documenting:
        
      - Nested server-side and/or client-side comments are not supported by mysql.cc
      - Using client-side macros in multi-line server-side comments is not supported
      - All characters after a client-side macro in a server-side comment will be omitted from the query string (and thus, will not be sent to server).
      
      
      client/mysql.cc:
        If a client-side macro appears inside a server-side comment, discard all characters in the comment after the macro.
      mysql-test/r/mysql.result:
        Added a test case for bug #30164.
      mysql-test/t/mysql.test:
        Added a test case for bug #30164.
      bb986a24
  3. 29 Aug, 2007 2 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#28779 (mysql_query() allows execution of statements with unbalanced · b0f899e9
      unknown authored
      comments)
      
      Before this fix, the server would accept queries that contained comments,
      even when the comments were not properly closed with a '*' '/' marker.
      
      For example,
        select 1 /* + 2 <EOF>
      would be accepted as
        select 1 /* + 2 */ <EOF>
      and executed as
        select 1
      
      With this fix, the server now rejects queries with unclosed comments
      as syntax errors.
      Both regular comments ('/' '*') and special comments ('/' '*' '!') must be
      closed with '*' '/' to be parsed correctly.
      
      
      mysql-test/r/comments.result:
        Unbalanced comments are a syntax error.
      mysql-test/t/comments.test:
        Unbalanced comments are a syntax error.
      sql/sql_lex.cc:
        Unbalanced comments are a syntax error.
      b0f899e9
    • unknown's avatar
      Test case for Bug#13675: DATETIME/DATE type in store proc param · 3d544050
      unknown authored
      seems to be converted as varbinary.
      
      The bug has been already fixed. This CS just adds a test case for it.
      
      
      mysql-test/r/sp.result:
        Update result file.
      mysql-test/t/sp.test:
        Test case for BUG#13675.
      3d544050
  4. 28 Aug, 2007 2 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-runtime · 901ead6c
      unknown authored
      into  moksha.local:/Users/davi/mysql/push/mysql-5.0-runtime
      
      
      901ead6c
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#30625 (Performance, reduce depth for expressions) · e0e44ad6
      unknown authored
      This is a performance bug, affecting in particular the bison generated code
      for the parser.
      
      Prior to this fix, the grammar used a long chain of reduces to parse an
      expression, like:
        bit_expr -> bit_term
        bit_term -> bit_factor
        bit_factor -> value_expr
        value_expr -> term
        term -> factor
      etc
      
      This chain of reduces cause the internal state automaton in the generated
      parser to execute more state transitions and more reduces, so that the
      generated MySQLParse() function would spend a lot of time looping to execute
      all the grammar reductions.
      
      With this patch, the grammar has been reorganized so that rules are more
      "flat", limiting the depth of reduces needed to parse <expr>.
      
      Tests have been written to enforce that relative priorities and properties
      of operators have not changed while changing the grammar.
      
      See the bug report for performance data.
      
      
      mysql-test/r/parser_precedence.result:
        Improved test coverage for operator precedence
      mysql-test/t/parser_precedence.test:
        Improved test coverage for operator precedence
      sql/sql_yacc.yy:
        Simplified the grammar to improve performances
      e0e44ad6
  5. 27 Aug, 2007 4 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#30632 HANDLER read failure causes hang · 34ded629
      unknown authored
      If, after the tables are locked, one of the conditions to read from a
      HANDLER table is not met, the handler code wrongly jumps to a error path
      that won't unlock the tables.
      
      The user-visible effect is that after a error in a handler read command,
      all subsequent handler operations on the same table will hang.
      
      The fix is simply to correct the code to jump to the (same) error path that
      unlocks the tables.
      
      
      mysql-test/r/handler.result:
        Bug#30632 test case result
      mysql-test/t/handler.test:
        Bug#30632 test case
      sql/sql_handler.cc:
        Always unlock the internal and external table level locks if any of the conditions
        (including errors) to read from a HANDLER table are not met.
      34ded629
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#25164 create table `a` as select * from `A` hangs · 369a5f1c
      unknown authored
      The problem from a user's perspective: user creates table A, and then tries
      to CREATE TABLE a SELECT from A - and this causes a deadlock error, a hang,
      or fails with a debug assert, but only if the storage engine is InnoDB.
      
      The origin of the problem: InnoDB uses case-insensitive collation
      (system_charset_info) when looking up the internal table share, thus returning
      the same share for 'a' and 'A'.
      
      Cause of the user-visible behavior: since the same share is returned to SQL
      locking subsystem, it assumes that the same table is first locked (within the
      same session) for WRITE, and then for READ, and returns a deadlock error.
      However, the code is wrong in not properly cleaning up upon an error, leaving
      external locks in place, which leads to assertion failures and hangs.
      
      Fix that has been implemented: the SQL layer should properly propagate the
      deadlock error, cleaning up and freeing all resources.
      
      Further work towards a more complete solution: InnoDB should not use case
      insensitive collation for table share hash if table names on disk honor the case.
      
      
      mysql-test/r/innodb-deadlock.result:
        Bug#25164 test case result
      mysql-test/t/innodb-deadlock.test:
        Bug#25164 test case. The CREATE TABLE may fail depending on the character set
        of the system and filesystem, but it should never hang.
      sql/lock.cc:
        Unlock the storage engine "external" table level locks, if the MySQL thr_lock
        locking subsystem detects a deadlock error.
      369a5f1c
    • unknown's avatar
      adjust version number · 7388ea3c
      unknown authored
      
      configure.in:
        adjust version number after 5.0.48 clone-off
      7388ea3c
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge bk-internal:/home/bk/mysql-5.0 · 478fb4a1
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/data0/mysqldev/my/build-200708231546-5.0.48/mysql-5.0-release
      
      
      478fb4a1
  6. 25 Aug, 2007 1 commit
  7. 24 Aug, 2007 9 commits
  8. 23 Aug, 2007 5 commits
  9. 22 Aug, 2007 7 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Cleanup in the "netware" subdirectory: · 870958d2
      unknown authored
      1) We do not provide the "isam" table handler in 5.0 and up (different from "myisam" !),
         so we do not need the ".def" files for the "isam"-specific tools.
      
      2) Use "basename" to get the base name of a file, not a harder-to-read sed expression.
      
      
      BitKeeper/deleted/.del-isamchk.def:
        Delete: netware/isamchk.def
      BitKeeper/deleted/.del-isamlog.def:
        Delete: netware/isamlog.def
      BitKeeper/deleted/.del-pack_isam.def:
        Delete: netware/pack_isam.def
      netware/Makefile.am:
        Use a plain "basename" showing the purpose, not a sed command which is harder to read.
      870958d2
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge malff@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-runtime · 6f052e87
      unknown authored
      into  weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-30237
      
      
      6f052e87
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt-30201 · 10329092
      unknown authored
      into  gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
      
      
      10329092
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge malff@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-runtime · 9d173ed2
      unknown authored
      into  weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-23062
      
      
      9d173ed2
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge malff@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-runtime · d4e34c80
      unknown authored
      into  weblab.(none):/home/marcsql/TREE/mysql-5.0-30237
      
      
      sql/sql_yacc.yy:
        Auto merged
      d4e34c80
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#30237 (Performance regression in boolean expressions) · fb1be0f1
      unknown authored
      This is a performance bug, related to the parsing or 'OR' and 'AND' boolean
      expressions.
      
      Let N be the number of expressions involved in a OR (respectively AND).
      
      When N=1
      
      For example, "select 1" involve only 1 term: there is no OR operator.
      
      In 4.0 and 4.1, parsing expressions not involving OR had no overhead.
      In 5.0, parsing adds some overhead, with Select->expr_list.
      
      With this patch, the overhead introduced in 5.0 has been removed,
      so that performances for N=1 should be identical to the 4.0 performances,
      which are optimal (there is no code executed at all)
      
      The overhead in 5.0 was in fact affecting significantly some operations.
      For example, loading 1 Million rows into a table with INSERTs,
      for a table that has 100 columns, leads to parsing 100 Millions of
      expressions, which means that the overhead related to Select->expr_list
      is executed 100 Million times ...
      
      Considering that N=1 is by far the most probable expression,
      this case should be optimal.
      
      When N=2
      
      For example, "select a OR b" involves 2 terms in the OR operator.
      
      In 4.0 and 4.1, parsing expressions involving 2 terms created 1 Item_cond_or
      node, which is the expected result.
      In 5.0, parsing these expression also produced 1 node, but with some extra
      overhead related to Select->expr_list : creating 1 list in Select->expr_list
      and another in Item_cond::list is inefficient.
      
      With this patch, the overhead introduced in 5.0 has been removed
      so that performances for N=2 should be identical to the 4.0 performances.
      Note that the memory allocation uses the new (thd->mem_root) syntax
      directly.
      The cost of "is_cond_or" is estimated to be neglectable: the real problem
      of the performance degradation comes from unneeded memory allocations.
      
      When N>=3
      
      For example, "select a OR b OR c ...", which involves 3 or more terms.
      
      In 4.0 and 4.1, the parser had no significant cost overhead, but produced
      an Item tree which is difficult to evaluate / optimize during runtime.
      In 5.0, the parser produces a better Item tree, using the Item_cond
      constructor that accepts a list of children directly, but at an extra cost
      related to Select->expr_list.
      
      With this patch, the code is implemented to take the best of the two
      implementations:
      - there is no overhead with Select->expr_list
      - the Item tree generated is optimized and flattened.
      
      This is achieved by adding children nodes into the Item tree directly,
      with Item_cond::add(), which avoids the need for temporary lists and memory
      allocation
      
      Note that this patch also provide an extra optimization, that the previous
      code in 5.0 did not provide: expressions are flattened in the Item tree,
      based on what the expression already parsed is, and not based on the order
      in which rules are reduced.
      
      For example : "(a OR b) OR c", "a OR (b OR c)" would both be represented
      with 2 Item_cond_or nodes before this patch, and with 1 node only with this
      patch. The logic used is based on the mathematical properties of the OR
      operator (it's associative), and produces a simpler tree.
      
      
      sql/item_cmpfunc.h:
        Improved performances for parsing boolean expressions
      sql/sql_yacc.yy:
        Improved performances for parsing boolean expressions
      mysql-test/r/parser_precedence.result:
        Added test cases to cover boolean operator precedence
      mysql-test/t/parser_precedence.test:
        Added test cases to cover boolean operator precedence
      fb1be0f1
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge hynda.mysql.fi:/home/my/mysql-5.0-main · 3dbffd24
      unknown authored
      into  hynda.mysql.fi:/home/my/mysql-5.0-marvel
      
      
      3dbffd24