1. 12 Feb, 2013 2 commits
  2. 08 Feb, 2013 4 commits
  3. 07 Feb, 2013 3 commits
  4. 06 Feb, 2013 1 commit
  5. 05 Feb, 2013 2 commits
  6. 04 Feb, 2013 2 commits
  7. 08 Feb, 2013 3 commits
  8. 07 Feb, 2013 3 commits
  9. 06 Feb, 2013 3 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#16263506 - INNODB; USE ABORT() ON ALL PLATFORMS INSTEAD OF · ecd5875e
      unknown authored
                     DEREFERENCING UT_DBG_NULL_PTR
      The abort() call is standard C but InnoDB only uses it in GCC
      environments.  UT_DBG_USE_ABORT is not defined the code crashed
      by dereferencing a null pointer instead of calling abort().
      Other code throughout MySQL including ndb, sql, mysys and other
      places call abort() directly.
      
      This bug also affects innodb.innodb_bug14147491.test which fails
      randomly on windows because of this issue. 
      
      Approved by marko in http://rb.no.oracle.com/rb/r/1936/
      ecd5875e
    • Ravinder Thakur's avatar
      Bug#14711808 MSI INSTALLATION / UPGRADE CAN CORRUPT EXISTING INSTALLATION · 16872793
      Ravinder Thakur authored
      Currently MySQL MSI installer on Windows installs MySQL in 
      "per user" mode. It means that if a Windows machine has 
      multiple users, they each can install MySQL independently. 
      However the default path of MySQL is "C:\Program Files (x86)\MySQL\"
      and when two users install MySQL on same machine, the installation
      by second user just overwrites the MySQL files. This default shared 
      location leads to the issue where if the second user uninstalls MySQL,
      the installation files are removed for the first user as well.
      
      In this fix, we are now making the default installation "per machine".
      It means that when MySQL is installed with defaults options, all
      users can see the shortcuts for MySQL in start menu(since installations 
      is for all users). Also when any user relaunches the installer, it will 
      consider that action uninstallation rather than installation for that user.
      
      There are command line options in installer that can be used to undo the
      "per machine" installation but will not consider that scenario.MySQL 
      is a server product and it does not make a lot of sense to install it
      differently for each user.
      16872793
    • unknown's avatar
      13625278 5.1 => 5.5 · 7b9c454b
      unknown authored
      7b9c454b
  10. 05 Feb, 2013 4 commits
    • Hery Ramilison's avatar
      Upmerge of the 5.1.68 build · b39fbb64
      Hery Ramilison authored
      b39fbb64
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge from mysql-5.5.30-release · 6f5c2deb
      unknown authored
      6f5c2deb
    • unknown's avatar
      13625278 5.1=> 5.5 · 34cfceac
      unknown authored
      34cfceac
    • Thayumanavar's avatar
      BUG#16196591 - CLIENTS CANNOT CONNECT TO MYSQL · 322edf6b
      Thayumanavar authored
      PROBLEM:
      When large number of connections are continuously made
      with wait_timeout of 600 seconds for  some hours, some
      connections remain after wait_timeout expired and also
      new connections get struck under the configuration and
      the scenario reported in bug#16196591.
      FIX:
      The cause of this bug is the issue identified  and fixed in
      the BUG#16088658 in 5.6.Also LOCK_thread_count contention 
      issue fixed in BUG#15921866 in 5.6 need to be in 5.5 as 
      well. Since the issue is not reproducible, it has been
      verified at customer configuration the issue could not
      be reproduced after a 48-hour test with a non-debug build               
      which includes the above two fixes backported.
      322edf6b
  11. 04 Feb, 2013 1 commit
  12. 01 Feb, 2013 3 commits
  13. 31 Jan, 2013 6 commits
    • Gleb Shchepa's avatar
      Bug #11827369: ASSERTION FAILED: !THD->LEX->CONTEXT_ANALYSIS_ONLY · cfc3acce
      Gleb Shchepa authored
      Manual up-merge from 5.1 to 5.5.
      cfc3acce
    • Gleb Shchepa's avatar
      Bug #11827369: ASSERTION FAILED: !THD->LEX->CONTEXT_ANALYSIS_ONLY · e55a5dbc
      Gleb Shchepa authored
      Some queries with the "SELECT ... FROM DUAL" nested subqueries
      failed with an assertion on debug builds.
      Non-debug builds were not affected.
      
      There were a few different issues with similar assertion
      failures on different queries:
      
      1. The first problem was related to the incomplete propagation
      of the "non-constant" item status from underlying subquery
      items to the outer item tree: in some cases non-constants were
      interpreted as constants and evaluated at the preparation stage
      (val_int() calls withing fix_fields() etc).
      
      Thus, the default implementation of Item_ref::const_item() from
      the Item parent class didn't take into account the "const_item"
      status of the referenced item tree -- it used the insufficient
      "used_tables() == 0" check instead. This worked in most cases
      since our "non-constant" functions like RAND() and SLEEP() set
      the RAND_TABLE_BIT in the used table map, so they aren't
      non-constant from Item_ref's "point of view". However, the
      "SELECT ... FROM DUAL" subquery may have an empty map of used
      tables, but at the same time subqueries are never "constant" at
      the context analysis stage (preparation, view creation etc).
      So, the non-contantness of such subqueries was missed.
      
      Fix: the Item_ref::const_item() function has been overloaded to
      take into account both (*ref)->const_item() status and tricky
      Item_ref::used_tables() return values, since the only
      (*ref)->const_item() call is not enough there.
      
      2. In some cases instead of the const_item() call we check a
      value of the Item::with_subselect field to recognize items
      with nested subqueries. However, the Item_ref class didn't
      propagate this value from the referenced item tree.
      
      Fix: Item::has_subquery() and Item_ref::has_subquery()
      functions have been backported from 5.6. All direct
      references to the with_subselect fields of nested items have
      been replaced with the has_subquery() function call.
      
      3. The Item_func_regex class didn't propagate with_subselect
      as well, since it overloads the Item_func::fix_fields()
      function with insufficient fix_fields() implementation.
      
      Fix: the Item_func_regex::fix_fields() function has been
      modified to gather "constant" statuses from inner items.
      
      4. The Item_func_isnull::update_used_tables() function has
      a special branch for the underlying item where the maybe_null
      value is false: in this case it marks the Item_func_isnull
      as a "const_item" and sets the cached_value to false.
      However, the Item_func_isnull::val_int() was not in sync with
      update_used_tables(): it didn't take into account neither
      const_item_cache nor cached_value for the case of
      "args[0]->maybe_null == false optimization".
      As far as such an Item_func_isnull has "const_item() == true",
      it's ok to call Item_func_isnull::val_int() etc from outer
      items on preparation stage. In this case the server tried to
      call Item_func_isnull::args[0]->isnull(), and if the args[0]
      item contained a nested not-nullable subquery, it failed
      with an assertion.
      
      Fix: take the value of Item_func_isnull::const_item_cache into
      account in the val_int() function.
      
      5. The auxiliary Item_is_not_null_test class has a similar
      optimization in the update_used_tables() function as the
      Item_func_isnull class has, and the same issue in the val_int()
      function.
      In addition to that the Item_is_not_null_test::update_used_tables()
      doesn't update the const_item_cache value, so the "maybe_null"
      optimization is useless there. Thus, we missed some optimizations
      of cases like these (before and after the fix):
        <  <is_not_null_test>(a),
        ---
        >  <cache>(<is_not_null_test>(a)),
      or
        < having (<is_not_null_test>(a) and <is_not_null_test>(a))
        ---
        > having 1
      etc.
      
      Fix: update Item_is_not_null_test::const_item_cache in
      update_used_tables() and take in into account in val_int().
      e55a5dbc
    • Yasufumi Kinoshita's avatar
      merge to mysql-5.5 from mysql-5.1 · b9996a90
      Yasufumi Kinoshita authored
      b9996a90
    • Yasufumi Kinoshita's avatar
      Bug #16220051 : INNODB_BUG12400341 FAILS ON VALGRIND WITH TOO MANY ACTIVE CONCURRENT TRANSACTION · 5d0b5d59
      Yasufumi Kinoshita authored
      innodb_bug12400341.test is disabled for valgrind daily test.
      It might be affected by the previous test's undo slots existing,
      because of slower execution.
      5d0b5d59
    • Chaithra Gopalareddy's avatar
      Bug#14096619: UNABLE TO RESTORE DATABASE DUMP · 92b4e02c
      Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
      Backport of fix for Bug#13581962
      
      mysql-test/r/cast.result:
        Added test result for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
      mysql-test/r/ctype_utf8mb4.result:
        Added test result for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
      mysql-test/t/cast.test:
        Added test case for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
      mysql-test/t/ctype_utf8mb4.test:
        Added test case for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
      sql/item_func.h:
        limit max length by MY_INT64_NUM_DECIMAL_DIGITS
      92b4e02c
    • Chaithra Gopalareddy's avatar
      Bug#14096619: UNABLE TO RESTORE DATABASE DUMP · 1495932f
      Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
      Backport of Bug#13581962
      
      mysql-test/r/cast.result:
        Added test result for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
      mysql-test/t/cast.test:
        Added test case for Bug#13581962,Bug#14096619
      sql/item_func.h:
        limit max length by MY_INT64_NUM_DECIMAL_DIGITS
      1495932f
  14. 30 Jan, 2013 3 commits
    • Mattias Jonsson's avatar
      Bug#14521864: MYSQL 5.1 TO 5.5 BUGS PARTITIONING · 90eecde8
      Mattias Jonsson authored
      Due to an internal change in the server code in between 5.1 and 5.5
      (wl#2649) the hash function used in KEY partitioning changed
      for numeric and date/time columns (from binary hash calculation
      to character based hash calculation).
      
      Also enum/set changed from latin1 ci based hash calculation to
      binary hash between 5.1 and 5.5. (bug#11759782).
      
      These changes makes KEY [sub]partitioned tables on any of
      the affected column types incompatible with 5.5 and above,
      since the calculation of partition id differs.
      
      Also since InnoDB asserts that a deleted row was previously
      read (positioned), the server asserts on delete of a row that
      is in the wrong partition.
      
      The solution for this situation is:
      
      1) The partitioning engine will check that delete/update will go to the
      partition the row was read from and give an error otherwise, consisting
      of the rows partitioning fields. This will avoid asserts in InnoDB and
      also alert the user that there is a misplaced row. A detailed error
      message will be given, including an entry to the error log consisting
      of both table name, partition and row content (PK if exists, otherwise
      all partitioning columns).
      
      
      2) A new optional syntax for KEY () partitioning in 5.5 is allowed:
      [SUB]PARTITION BY KEY [ALGORITHM = N] (list_of_cols)
      Where N = 1 uses the same hashing as 5.1 (Numeric/date/time fields uses
      binary hashing, ENUM/SET uses charset hashing) N = 2 uses the same
      hashing as 5.5 (Numeric/date/time fields uses charset hashing,
      ENUM/SET uses binary hashing). If not set on CREATE/ALTER it will
      default to 2.
      
      This new syntax should probably be ignored by NDB.
      
      
      3) Since there is a demand for avoiding scanning through the full
      table, during upgrade the ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY ... command is
      considered a no-op (only .frm change) if everything except ALGORITHM
      is the same and ALGORITHM was not set before, which allows manually
      upgrading such table by something like:
      ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 1 () or
      ALTER TABLE t PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 2 ()
      
      
      4) Enhanced partitioning with CHECK/REPAIR to also check for/repair
      misplaced rows. (Also works for ALTER TABLE t CHECK/REPAIR PARTITION)
      
      CHECK FOR UPGRADE:
      If the .frm version is < 5.5.3
      and uses KEY [sub]partitioning
      and an affected column type
      then it will fail with an message:
      KEY () partitioning changed, please run:
      ALTER TABLE `test`.`t1`  PARTITION BY KEY ALGORITHM = 1 (a)
      PARTITIONS 12
      (i.e. current partitioning clause, with the addition of
      ALGORITHM = 1)
      
      CHECK without FOR UPGRADE:
      if MEDIUM (default) or EXTENDED options are given:
      Scan all rows and verify that it is in the correct partition.
      Fail for the first misplaced row.
      
      REPAIR:
      if default or EXTENDED (i.e. not QUICK/USE_FRM):
      Scan all rows and every misplaced row is moved into its correct
      partitions.
      
      
      5) Updated mysqlcheck (called by mysql_upgrade) to handle the
      new output from CHECK FOR UPGRADE, to run the ALTER statement
      instead of running REPAIR.
      
      This will allow mysql_upgrade (or CHECK TABLE t FOR UPGRADE) to upgrade
      a KEY [sub]partitioned table that has any affected field type
      and a .frm version < 5.5.3 to ALGORITHM = 1 without rebuild.
      
      
      Also notice that if the .frm has a version of >= 5.5.3 and ALGORITHM
      is not set, it is not possible to know if it consists of rows from
      5.1 or 5.5! In these cases I suggest that the user does:
      (optional)
      LOCK TABLE t WRITE;
      SHOW CREATE TABLE t;
      (verify that it has no ALGORITHM = N, and to be safe, I would suggest
      backing up the .frm file, to be used if one need to change to another
      ALGORITHM = N, without needing to rebuild/repair)
      ALTER TABLE t <old partitioning clause, but with ALGORITHM = N>;
      which should set the ALGORITHM to N (if the table has rows from
      5.1 I would suggest N = 1, otherwise N = 2)
      CHECK TABLE t;
      (here one could use the backed up .frm instead and change to a new N
      and run CHECK again and see if it passes)
      and if there are misplaced rows:
      REPAIR TABLE t;
      (optional)
      UNLOCK TABLES;
      90eecde8
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · 6baf836a
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      6baf836a
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · 58c2ca3e
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      58c2ca3e