1. 06 May, 2006 4 commits
  2. 05 May, 2006 3 commits
  3. 04 May, 2006 16 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge paul@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · dbfd0202
      unknown authored
      into  polar.kitebird.com:/src/extern/MySQL/bk/mysql-4.1
      
      dbfd0202
    • unknown's avatar
      .del-changelog-4.1.xml~8aa496ebed09d868: · 582163b4
      unknown authored
        Delete: Docs/changelog-4.1.xml
      
      
      BitKeeper/deleted/.del-changelog-4.1.xml~8aa496ebed09d868:
        Delete: Docs/changelog-4.1.xml
      582163b4
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge polar.kitebird.com:/src/extern/MySQL/bk/mysql-4.0 · 3b9f223e
      unknown authored
      into  polar.kitebird.com:/src/extern/MySQL/bk/mysql-4.1
      
      3b9f223e
    • unknown's avatar
      .del-changelog-4.0.xml~8f56ee8a913e848b: · b57cc4fb
      unknown authored
        Delete: Docs/changelog-4.0.xml
      
      
      BitKeeper/deleted/.del-changelog-4.0.xml~8f56ee8a913e848b:
        Delete: Docs/changelog-4.0.xml
      b57cc4fb
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge jamppa@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · df5e3506
      unknown authored
      into  ua141d10.elisa.omakaista.fi:/home/my/bk/mysql-4.1
      
      df5e3506
    • unknown's avatar
      Fixed Bug#11324: · 43a80d8a
      unknown authored
      TIME_FORMAT using "%l:%i" returns 36:00 with 24:00:00 in TIME column
      
      
      mysql-test/r/date_formats.result:
        Added test case for Bug#11324,
        "TIME_FORMAT using "%l:%i" returns 36:00 with 24:00:00 in TIME column"
      mysql-test/t/date_formats.test:
        Added test case for Bug#11324,
        "TIME_FORMAT using "%l:%i" returns 36:00 with 24:00:00 in TIME column"
      43a80d8a
    • unknown's avatar
      Fix for Bug#11326. · 4806b1a4
      unknown authored
      
      mysql-test/r/date_formats.result:
        Added test cases for Bug#11326
      mysql-test/t/date_formats.test:
        Added test cases for Bug#11326
      4806b1a4
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge jamppa@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · cb3b6549
      unknown authored
      into  a193-229-222-105.elisa-laajakaista.fi:/home/my/bk/mysql-4.1
      
      cb3b6549
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1 · dd32a4f1
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1-bug16372
      
      dd32a4f1
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1 · e2b2a451
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1-bug16501
      
      e2b2a451
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1 · 707778d4
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1-bug16372
      
      707778d4
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge jamppa@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · 029e4410
      unknown authored
      into  hundin.mysql.fi:/home/jani/mysql-4.1
      
      
      sql/sql_show.cc:
        Auto merged
      029e4410
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1 · dc8ec54a
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/tomash/src/mysql_ab/mysql-4.1-bug16501
      
      dc8ec54a
    • unknown's avatar
      Merge tnurnberg@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-4.1 · 7c68a3ee
      unknown authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/mysql-4.1-19025e
      
      7c68a3ee
    • unknown's avatar
      test result fixed · 6104ece0
      unknown authored
      
      mysql-test/r/mysqltest.result:
        result fixed
      6104ece0
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#19025 4.1 mysqldump doesn't correctly dump "auto_increment = [int]" · 64828eeb
      unknown authored
      mysqldump / SHOW CREATE TABLE will show the NEXT available value for
      the PK, rather than the *first* one that was available (that named in
      the original CREATE TABLE ... AUTO_INCREMENT = ... statement).
      
      This should produce correct and robust behaviour for the obvious use
      cases -- when no data were inserted, then we'll produce a statement
      featuring the same value the original CREATE TABLE had; if we dump
      with values, INSERTing the values on the target machine should set the
      correct next_ID anyway (and if not, we'll still have our AUTO_INCREMENT =
      ... to do that). Lastly, just the CREATE statement (with no data) for
      a table that saw inserts would still result in a table that new values
      could safely be inserted to).
      
      There seems to be no robust way however to see whether the next_ID
      field is > 1 because it was set to something else with CREATE TABLE
      ... AUTO_INCREMENT = ..., or because there is an AUTO_INCREMENT column
      in  the table (but no initial value was set with AUTO_INCREMENT = ...)
      and then one or more rows were INSERTed, counting up next_ID. This
      means that in both cases, we'll generate an AUTO_INCREMENT =
      ... clause in SHOW CREATE TABLE / mysqldump.  As we also show info on,
      say, charsets even if the user did not explicitly give that info in
      their own CREATE TABLE, this shouldn't be an issue.
      
      As per above, the next_ID will be affected by any INSERTs that have
      taken place, though.  This /should/ result in correct and robust
      behaviour, but it may look non-intuitive to some users if they CREATE
      TABLE ... AUTO_INCREMENT = 1000 and later (after some INSERTs) have
      SHOW CREATE TABLE give them a different value (say, CREATE TABLE
      ... AUTO_INCREMENT = 1006), so the docs should possibly feature a
      caveat to that effect.
      
      It's not very intuitive the way it works now (with the fix), but it's
      *correct*.  We're not storing the original value anyway, if we wanted
      that, we'd have to change on-disk representation?
      
      If we do dump/load cycles with empty DBs, nothing will change.  This
      changeset includes an additional test case that proves that tables
      with rows will create the same next_ID for AUTO_INCREMENT = ... across
      dump/restore cycles.
      
      Confirmed by support as likely solution for client's problem.
      
      
      mysql-test/r/auto_increment.result:
        test for creation of AUTO_INCREMENT=... clause
      mysql-test/r/gis-rtree.result:
        Add AUTO_INCREMENT=... clauses where appropriate
      mysql-test/r/mysqldump.result:
        show that AUTO_INCREMENT=... will survive dump/restore cycles
      mysql-test/r/symlink.result:
        Add AUTO_INCREMENT=... clauses where appropriate
      mysql-test/t/auto_increment.test:
        test for creation of AUTO_INCREMENT=... clause
      mysql-test/t/mysqldump.test:
        show that AUTO_INCREMENT=... will survive dump/restore cycles
      sql/sql_show.cc:
        Add AUTO_INCREMENT=... to output of SHOW CREATE TABLE if there is an
        AUTO_INCREMENT column, and NEXT_ID > 1 (the default).  We must not print
        the clause for engines that do not support this as it would break the
        import of dumps, but as of this writing, the test for whether
        AUTO_INCREMENT columns are allowed and wether AUTO_INCREMENT=...
        is supported is identical, !(file->table_flags() & HA_NO_AUTO_INCREMENT))
        Because of that, we do not explicitly test for the feature,
        but may extrapolate its existence from that of an AUTO_INCREMENT column.
      64828eeb
  4. 03 May, 2006 8 commits
  5. 02 May, 2006 3 commits
  6. 01 May, 2006 5 commits
  7. 30 Apr, 2006 1 commit