1. 30 Mar, 2013 1 commit
    • Chaithra Gopalareddy's avatar
      Bug#14261010: ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE CRASHES THE SERVER · 4a3708a4
      Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
            
      Problem:
      Insert with 'on duplicate key update' on a view,
      crashes the server.
            
      Analysis:
      During an insert on to a view, we do the following:
            
      For insert fields and values -
      1. Resolve insert values.
      2. Resolve insert fields.
      3. Check if the fields and values are all from a 
         single table of a view in case of INSERT VALUES.
         Do not check the same in case of INSERT SELECT,
         as the values can be read from different table than
         that of the view.
            
      For the update fields (if DUP UPDATE is used)
      1. Create a name resolution context with 'table_list' only.
      2. Resolve update fields in this context.
      3. Check if update fields and values are from the same
         table as the insert fields.
      4. Get the next name resolution context. Concatinate this
         with the previous one.
      5. Resolve update values in this context as we can refer
         to other tables in the values clause.
            
      Note that at step 3(of update fields), we check for
      'used_tables map' of update values, without resolving them
      first. Hence the crash.
            
      Fix:
      At step 3, do not pass the update values to check if its a
      single table view update, as update values can refer other table.
            
      Code has been re-organized to function like check_insert_fields.
      4a3708a4
  2. 29 Mar, 2013 7 commits
  3. 28 Mar, 2013 10 commits
    • Georgi Kodinov's avatar
      merge · 7c2a1409
      Georgi Kodinov authored
      7c2a1409
    • Georgi Kodinov's avatar
      Addendum #1 to the fix for bug #16451878 : GEOMETRY QUERY CRASHES SERVER · 2739ee38
      Georgi Kodinov authored
      Fixed the get_data_size() methods for multi-point features to check properly for end 
      of their respective data arrays.
      Extended the point checking function to take a 3d optional argument so cases where
      there's additional data in each array element (besides the point data itself) can be
      covered by the helper function.
      Fixed the 3 cases where such offset was present to use the proper checking helper 
      function.
      Test cases added.
      Fixed review comments.
      2739ee38
    • Nisha Gopalakrishnan's avatar
      Merge from 5.1 to 5.5 · 65b34493
      Nisha Gopalakrishnan authored
      65b34493
    • Nisha Gopalakrishnan's avatar
      BUG#11753852: IF() VALUES ARE EVALUATED DIFFERENTLY IN A · 0de30479
      Nisha Gopalakrishnan authored
                    REGULAR SQL VS PREPARED STATEMENT
      
      Analysis:
      ---------
      
      When passing user variables as parameters to the
      prepared statements, the IF() function evaluation
      turns out to be incorrect.
      
      Consider the example:
      
      SET @var1='0.038687';
      SELECT @var1 , IF( @var1 = 0 , 1 ,@var1 ) AS sqlif ;
      +----------+----------+
      | @var1    | sqlif    |
      +----------+----------+
      | 0.038687 | 0.038687 |
      +----------+----------+
      
      Executing a prepared statement where the parameters are
      supplied:
      
      PREPARE fail_stmt FROM "SELECT ? ,
      IF( ? = 0 , 1 , ? ) AS ps_if_fail" ;
      EXECUTE fail_stmt USING @var1 ,@var1 , @var1 ;
      +----------+------------+
      | ?        | ps_if_fail |
      +----------+------------+
      | 0.038687 | 1          |
      +----------+------------+
      1 row in set (0.00 sec)
      
      In the regular statement or while executing the prepared
      statements without passing parameters, the decimal
      precision is set for the user variable of type string.
      The comparison function used for evaluation considered
      the precision while comparing the values.
      
      But while executing the prepared statement with the
      parameters supplied, the decimal precision was not
      set. Thus the comparison function chosen was different
      which looked at the absolute values for comparison.
      
      Fix:
      ----
      
      The fix is to set 'decimals' field of Item_param to the
      default value which is nothing but the maximum number of
      decimals(NOT_FIXED_DEC). This is set for cases where the
      strings are converted to the numeric form within certain
      functions. Thus the value is not rounded off during
      comparison, ensuring correct evaluation.
      0de30479
    • Sujatha Sivakumar's avatar
      Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 · 5c6611b5
      Sujatha Sivakumar authored
      5c6611b5
    • Sujatha Sivakumar's avatar
      Bug#14324766:PARTIALLY WRITTEN INSERT STATEMENT IN BINLOG · c78c1fe5
      Sujatha Sivakumar authored
      NO ERRORS REPORTED
            
      Problem:
      =======
      Errors from my_b_fill are ignored. MYSQL_BIN_LOG::write_cache
      code assumes that 0 returned from my_b_fill always means
      end-of-cache, but that is incorrect. It can result in error
      and the error is ignored. Other callers of my_b_fill don't
      check for error: my_b_copy_to_file, maybe my_b_gets.
            
      Fix:
      ===
      An error handler is already present to check the "cache"
      error that is reported during "MYSQL_BIN_LOG::write_cache"
      call. Hence error handlers are added for "my_b_copy_to_file"
      and "my_b_gets".
      During my_b_fill() function call, when the cache read fails
      info->error= -1 is set. Hence a check for "info->error"
      is added for the above to callers upon their return.
      c78c1fe5
    • sayantan dutta's avatar
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      b2eb666e
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      Bug #16244691 SERVER GONE AWAY ERROR OCCURS DEPENDING ON THE NUMBER OF · 9d7f333a
      Annamalai Gurusami authored
      TABLE/KEY RELATIONS
      
      Problem:
      
      When there are many tables, linked together through the foreign key
      constraints, then loading one table will recursively open other tables.  This
      can sometimes lead to thread stack overflow.  In such situations the server
      will exit.
      
      I see the stack overflow problem when the thread_stack is 196608 (the default
      value for 32-bit systems).  I don't see the problem when the thread_stack is
      set to 262144 (the default value for 64-bit systems).
      
      Solution:
      
      Currently, in InnoDB, there is a macro DICT_FK_MAX_RECURSIVE_LOAD which defines
      the maximum number of tables that will be loaded recursively because of foreign
      key relations.  This is currently set to 250.  We can reduce this number to 33
      (anything more than 33 does not solve the problem for the default value).  We
      can keep it small enough so that thread stack overflow does not happen for the
      default values.  Reducing the DICT_FK_MAX_RECURSIVE_LOAD will not affect the
      functionality of InnoDB.  The tables will eventually be loaded. 
      
      rb#2058 approved by Marko
      
      9d7f333a
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 · 28f26d3e
      Annamalai Gurusami authored
      28f26d3e
  4. 27 Mar, 2013 7 commits
    • Georgi Kodinov's avatar
      merge 5.1->5.5 · 3c358724
      Georgi Kodinov authored
      3c358724
    • Georgi Kodinov's avatar
      Bug #16451878: GEOMETRY QUERY CRASHES SERVER · 0f31bfea
      Georgi Kodinov authored
      The GIS WKB reader was checking for the presence of
      enough data by first multiplying the number read (where
      it could overflow) and only then comparing it to the
      number of bytes available.
      This can overflow and effectively turn off the check.
      Fixed by:
      1. Introducing a new function that does division only so
      no overflow is possible.
      2. Using the proper macros and parenthesizing them.
      3. Doing an in-line division check in the only place where
      the boundary check is done over a data structure other
      than a dense points array.
      0f31bfea
    • Nuno Carvalho's avatar
      BUG#16541422: LOG-SLAVE-UPDATES + REPLICATE-WILD-IGNORE-TABLE FAILS FOR USER VARIABLES · accc5d92
      Nuno Carvalho authored
      Merge from mysql-5.1 into mysql-5.5.
      accc5d92
    • Nuno Carvalho's avatar
      BUG#16541422: LOG-SLAVE-UPDATES + REPLICATE-WILD-IGNORE-TABLE FAILS FOR USER VARIABLES · daa3ab6f
      Nuno Carvalho authored
      Fixed possible uninitialized variable.
      daa3ab6f
    • Sujatha Sivakumar's avatar
      Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 · ad145643
      Sujatha Sivakumar authored
      ad145643
    • Sujatha Sivakumar's avatar
      Bug#11829838: ALTER TABLE NOT BINLOGGED WITH · 5745b67e
      Sujatha Sivakumar authored
      --BINLOG-IGNORE-DB AND FULLY QUALIFIED TABLE
            
      Problem:
      =======
      An ALTER TABLE statement is not written to binlog if server
      started with "--binlog-ignore-db some database" and 'fully
      qualified' table names are used in the ALTER TABLE statement
      altering table different from current database context.
            
      Analysis:
      ========
      The above mentioned problem not only affects "ALTER TABLE"
      statements but also to all kind of statements. Once the 
      current default database becomes "NULL" none of the 
      statements will be binlogged.
            
      The current behaviour is such that if the user has specified
      restrictions on which database needs to be replicated and the
      default db is not specified, then do not replicate.
      This means that "NULL" is considered to be equivalent to
      everything (default db = null implied ignore don't log the
      statement).
            
      Fix:
      ===
      "NULL" should not be considered as equivalent to everything.
      Since the filtering criteria is not equal to "NULL" the
      statement should be logged into binlog.
      5745b67e
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      Bug #16244691 SERVER GONE AWAY ERROR OCCURS DEPENDING ON THE NUMBER OF · ff20c67f
      Annamalai Gurusami authored
      TABLE/KEY RELATIONS
      
      Problem:
      
      When there are many tables, linked together through the foreign key
      constraints, then loading one table will recursively open other tables.  This
      can sometimes lead to thread stack overflow.  In such situations the server
      will exit.
      
      I see the stack overflow problem when the thread_stack is 196608 (the default
      value for 32-bit systems).  I don't see the problem when the thread_stack is
      set to 262144 (the default value for 64-bit systems).
      
      Solution:
      
      Currently, in InnoDB, there is a macro DICT_FK_MAX_RECURSIVE_LOAD which defines
      the maximum number of tables that will be loaded recursively because of foreign
      key relations.  This is currently set to 250.  We can reduce this number to 33
      (anything more than 33 does not solve the problem for the default value).  We
      can keep it small enough so that thread stack overflow does not happen for the
      default values.  Reducing the DICT_FK_MAX_RECURSIVE_LOAD will not affect the
      functionality of InnoDB.  The tables will eventually be loaded. 
      
      rb#2058 approved by Marko
      
      ff20c67f
  5. 26 Mar, 2013 7 commits
    • Andrei Elkin's avatar
      merge from 5.1->5.5 repo. · 2e876a7a
      Andrei Elkin authored
      2e876a7a
    • Andrei Elkin's avatar
      merge from 5.1 repo. · cf23bb76
      Andrei Elkin authored
      cf23bb76
    • mysql-builder@oracle.com's avatar
      No commit message · 3d3abedc
      mysql-builder@oracle.com authored
      No commit message
      3d3abedc
    • Andrei Elkin's avatar
      merge from 5.1 · fd434bca
      Andrei Elkin authored
      fd434bca
    • Andrei Elkin's avatar
      Bug#16541422 LOG-SLAVE-UPDATES + REPLICATE-WILD-IGNORE-TABLE FAILS FOR USER VARIABLES · 0a31d4f4
      Andrei Elkin authored
      At logging a first Query referring a user var, the slave missed to log the user var.
      It appears that at execution of a Uservar event the slaver applier
      thought of the variable as already logged.
      The reason of misjudgement is in coincidence of query id:s: of one that the thread
      holds at Uservar execution and another one that the thread sees at the Query applying.
      While the two are naturally different in the regular execution branch (as two computational
      events are separated as individual events), in the deferred applying case the User var execution
      effectively belongs to its Query processing.
      
      Fixed with storing the Uservar parsing time (where desicion to defer is taken) query id 
      to temporarily substitute with it the actual query id at the Uservar execution time
      (along with its query).
      Such manipulation mimics behaviour of the regular applying branch.
      0a31d4f4
    • Tor Didriksen's avatar
      NULL merge 5.1 => 5.5 · 5bfb832c
      Tor Didriksen authored
      5bfb832c
    • Tor Didriksen's avatar
      Bug#62856 Check for "stack overrun" doesn't work with gcc-4.6, server crashes · d9ccd370
      Tor Didriksen authored
      Bug#13243248 CHECK FOR "STACK OVERRUN" DOESN'T WORK WITH GCC-4.6, SERVER CRASHES
      
      The existing check for stack direction may give wrong results
      for new versions of gcc at high optimization levels.
      
      Solution: Backport the stack-direction check from 5.5
      d9ccd370
  6. 25 Mar, 2013 1 commit
    • Manish Kumar's avatar
      BUG#16438800 - SLAVE_MAX_ALLOWED_PACKET NOT HONORED ON SLAVE IO CONNECT · 142fbb9e
      Manish Kumar authored
            
      Problem - When the slave was disconnected from the master, under certain 
                conditions, upon reconnect, it will report that it received a 
                packet larger the slave_max_allowed_packet which causes the
                replication to stop.
       
      Analysis -The reason of this failure is that on reconnect
                the slave sets the max_allowed_packet from the master's mi->mysql
                object which keeps the max_allowed_packet as 1MB. This causes the 
                slave to report such error on recieving packet bigger than 1MB. 
                START SLAVE on the slave fixes the problem since it restarts
                slave threads which initializes the max_allowed_packet to
                slave_max_allowed_packet.
            
      Fix - The problem is fixed by some code refactoring and introduction of a new
            function which updates the max_allowed_packet for the THD object of the
            slave thread and the mysql->options max_allowed_packet.
      142fbb9e
  7. 22 Mar, 2013 5 commits
  8. 21 Mar, 2013 2 commits