1. 09 Apr, 2010 5 commits
  2. 08 Apr, 2010 2 commits
    • Vasil Dimov's avatar
      Adjust mysql-test/suite/binlog/t/binlog_killed.test after a change · 91600911
      Vasil Dimov authored
      in behavior in InnoDB. The change in behavior was introduced by this
      changeset:
      
        ------------------------------------------------------------
        revno: 3370
        revision-id: vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20100331130613-8ja7n0vh36a80457
        parent: vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20100331130440-l0y517y3mjsjqy4v
        parent: vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20100331113119-2kbgkaz1d426a43c
        committer: Vasil Dimov <vasil.dimov@oracle.com>
        branch nick: mysql-5.1-innodb
        timestamp: Wed 2010-03-31 16:06:13 +0300
        message:
          Merge from innodb-branches-5.1
            ------------------------------------------------------------
            revno: 0.1.819
            revision-id: vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20100331113119-2kbgkaz1d426a43c
            parent: vasil.dimov@oracle.com-20100331064722-9rc3wypzmer7d6jj
            parent: svn-v4:cee13dc7-1704-0410-992b-c9b4543f1246:branches/5.1:6918
            committer: Vasil Dimov <vasil.dimov@oracle.com>
            branch nick: innodb-branches-5.1
            timestamp: Wed 2010-03-31 14:31:19 +0300
            message:
              Merge from SVN
                ------------------------------------------------------------
                revno: 0.2.1
                revision-id: svn-v4:cee13dc7-1704-0410-992b-c9b4543f1246:branches/5.1:6918
                parent: svn-v4:cee13dc7-1704-0410-992b-c9b4543f1246:branches/5.1:6912
                committer: mmakela
                timestamp: Wed 2010-03-31 07:14:51 +0000
                message:
                  branches/5.1: Obey KILL during a lock wait (Bug #51920).
        
                  srv_suspend_mysql_thread(), srv_lock_timeout_and_monitor_thread():
                  Check trx_is_interrupted() in addition to checking the lock wait timeout.
        
                  rb://279 approved by Sunny Bains
      91600911
    • vdimov's avatar
      branches/zip: Adjust the innodb test after change in behavior in MySQL · ed21e31e
      vdimov authored
      The change in behavior was introduced by this changeset:
      
        ------------------------------------------------------------
        revno: 3405
        revision-id: joro@sun.com-20100317141846-es0qyf5zcqb0hu1c
        parent: davi.arnaut@sun.com-20100309125156-z2c4uyqque49v61k
        committer: Georgi Kodinov <joro@sun.com>
        branch nick: B49838-5.1-bugteam
        timestamp: Wed 2010-03-17 16:18:46 +0200
        message:
          Bug #49838: DROP INDEX and ADD UNIQUE INDEX for same index may corrupt
             definition at engine
          
          If a single ALTER TABLE contains both DROP INDEX and ADD INDEX using 
          the same index name (a.k.a. index modification) we need to disable 
          in-place alter table because we can't ask the storage engine to have 
          two copies of the index with the same name even temporarily (if we 
          first do the ADD INDEX and then DROP INDEX) and we can't modify 
          indexes that are needed by e.g. foreign keys if we first do 
          DROP INDEX and then ADD INDEX.
          Fixed the problem by disabling in-place ALTER TABLE for these cases.
        modified:
          mysql-test/r/innodb_mysql.result sp1f-innodb_mysql.result-20060426055153-bychbbfnqtvmvrwccwhn24i6yi46uqjv
          mysql-test/t/innodb_mysql.test sp1f-innodb_mysql.test-20060816102624-6ymo37d3nyhvbqyzqn5ohsfuydwo426k
          sql/sql_table.cc               sp1f-sql_table.cc-19700101030959-tzdkvgigezpuaxnldqh3fx2h7h2ggslu
      ed21e31e
  3. 07 Apr, 2010 20 commits
  4. 06 Apr, 2010 10 commits
  5. 05 Apr, 2010 1 commit
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      Bug#52336 Segfault / crash in 5.1 copy_fields (param=0x9872980) at sql_select.cc:15355 · 416f3205
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      The problem is that we can not use make_cond_for_table().
      This function relies on used_tables() condition
      which is not set properly for subqueries.
      As result subquery is not filtered out.
      The fix is to use remove_eq_conds() function instead
      of make_cond_for_table() func. 'remove_eq_conds()'
      algorithm relies on const_item() value and it allows
      to handle subqueries in right way.
      416f3205
  6. 02 Apr, 2010 1 commit
    • Gleb Shchepa's avatar
      Bug #40625: Concat fails on DOUBLE values in a Stored · 99a0ace4
      Gleb Shchepa authored
                  Procedure, while DECIMAL works
      
      Selecting of the CONCAT(...<SP variable>...) result into
      a user variable may return wrong data.
      
      
      Item_func_concat::val_str contains a number of memory
      allocation-saving tricks. One of them concatenates
      strings inplace inserting the value of one string
      at the beginning of the other string. However,
      this trick didn't care about strings those points
      to the same data buffer: this is possible when
      a CONCAT() parameter is a stored procedure variable -
      Item_sp_variable::val_str() uses the intermediate
      Item_sp_variable::str_value field, where it may
      store a reference to an external buffer.
      
      
      The Item_func_concat::val_str function has been
      modified to take into account val_str functions
      (such as Item_sp_variable::val_str) that return
      a pointer to an internal Item member variable
      that may reference to a buffer provided.
      99a0ace4
  7. 01 Apr, 2010 1 commit
    • Anurag Shekhar's avatar
      Bug #47904 Incorrect results w/ table subquery, derived SQs, and LEFT JOIN · 92a41960
      Anurag Shekhar authored
             on index
      
      'my_decimal' class has two members which can be used to access the 
      value. The member variable buf (inherited from parent class decimal_t) 
      is set to member variable buffer so that both are pointing to same value.
      
      Item_copy_decimal::copy() uses memcpy to clone 'my_decimal'. The member
      buffer is declared as an array and memcpy results in copying the values
      of the array, but the inherited member buf, which should be pointing at
      the begining of the array 'buffer' starts pointing to the begining of 
      buffer in original object (which is being cloned). Further updates on 
      'my_decimal' updates only the inherited member 'buf' but leaves 
      buffer unchanged.
      
      Later when the new object (which now holds a inconsistent value) is cloned
      again using proper cloning function 'my_decimal2decimal' the buf pointer
      is fixed resulting in loss of the current value.
      
      Using my_decimal2decimal instead of memcpy in Item_copy_decimal::copy()
      fixed this problem.
      92a41960