use --replace_column for rows, as the numbers are not important.

Commit 738d4604 changed component name
from "backup" to "Backup". Use the new name now.

ibuf_bitmap_buffered(): A new predicate, to check if the
IBUF_BITMAP_BUFFERED bit for a particular page is set.

ibuf_merge(): If ibuf_bitmap_buffered() does not hold,
skip the records for the page. One reason why we might have
this situation is the bug that was fixed in
commit 34c283ba (MDEV-32132).

Fixed tests:
main.flush_corruption - disabled service connection for some queries
since it is necessary that the query SELECT pass in the same session

- Updated capabilities for PostgreSQL in server.cfg
- Updated test-ATIS & test-table-elimination to work with PostgreSQL
- Updated test-transaction test to also work with non transactional tables

Other things:
- Added test of tables with many keys in test-insert
- Added 2 new GROUP BY .. ORDER BY test

This works the same as secure-file-priv="", but is more obvious way to
turn of secure-file-priv.

- This issue caused by commit 4700f2ac(MDEV-30796)
During bulk insert operation, InnoDB wrongly stores the next autoincrement
value as current autoincrement value. So update the current autoincrement
value rather than next auto increment value.

`fmt::detail::make_arg` does not accept temporaries. Make it happy by
storing the format arg values in a temporary array first.
Signed-off-by: Ruoyu Zhong <zhongruoyu@outlook.com>

`fmt::detail::make_arg` does not accept temporaries, so the code snippet
checking system libfmt needs to be adjusted.
Signed-off-by: Ruoyu Zhong <zhongruoyu@outlook.com>

- This commit is different from 10.6 commit c4382848.
Due to Commit 045757af (MDEV-24621),
InnoDB does buffer and pre-sort the records for each index, and build
the indexes one page at a time.

Multiple large insert ignore statment aborts the server during bulk
insert operation. Problem is that InnoDB merge record exceeds
the page size. To avoid this scenario, InnoDB should catch
too big record while buffering the insert operation itself.

row_merge_buf_encode(): returns length of the encoded index record

row_merge_buf_write(): Catches the DB_TOO_BIG_RECORD earlier and
returns error

The original test in the report of MDEV-31463 is contrived and
nondeterministic, causing MDEV-31586. We update the test to make it
more directly addresses the underlying cause of MDEV-31463, namely
errors from queries sent to the data node not consumed when trying to
set lock wait timeout. This is achieved through the debug sync
facility.

The problem was earlier fixed by a patch for MDEV-27207
  68403eed
and an additional cleanup patch for MDEV-27207
  88dd50b8
The above patches added MTR tests for INET6.

Now adding UUID specific MTR tests only.

Before this patch, the code in Item_field::print() used
this convention (described in sql_explain.h:ExplainDataStructureLifetime):

- By default, the table that Item_field refers to is accessible.
- ANALYZE and SHOW {EXPLAIN|ANALYZE} may print Items after some
  temporary tables have been dropped. They use
  QT_DONT_ACCESS_TMP_TABLES flag. When it is ON, Item_field::print
  will not access the table it refers to, if it is a temp.table

The bug was that EXPLAIN statement also may compute subqueries (depending
on subquery context and @@expensive_subquery_limit setting). After the
computation, the subquery calls JOIN::cleanup(true) which drops some of
its temporary tables. Calling Item_field::print() that refer to such table
will cause an access to free'd memory.

In this patch, we take into account that query optimization can compute
a subquery and discard its temporary tables. Item_field::print() now
assumes that any temporary table might have already been dropped.
This means QT_DONT_ACCESS_TMP_TABLES flag is not needed - we imply it is
always present.

But we also make one exception: derived tables are not freed in
JOIN::cleanup() call. They are freed later in close_thread_tables(),
at the same time when regular tables are closed.
Because of that, Item_field::print may assume that temp.tables
representing derived tables are available.

Initial patch by: Rex Jonston
Reviewed by: Monty <monty@mariadb.org>

Something went wrong during a merge (from 10.5 to 10.6)
of 68403eed
(fixing bugs MDEV-27207 and MDEV-31719).

Originally (in 10.5) the fix was done in_inet6::set() in
plugin/type_inet/sql_type_inet.cc.
In 10.6 this code resides in a different place:
in the method in_fbt::set() of a template class
in sql/sql_type_fixedbin.h.

During the merge:
- the fix did not properly migrate to in_fbt::set()
- the related MTR tests disappeared

This patch fixes in_fbt::set() properly and restores MTR tests.

The problem is that the first execution of the prepared statement makes
a permanent optimization of converting the LEFT JOIN to an INNER JOIN.

This is based on the assumption that all the user parameters (?) are
always constants and that parameters to Item_cond() will not change value
from true and false between different executions.

(The example was using IS NULL, which will change value if parameter
depending on if the parameter is NULL or not).

The fix is to change Item_cond::fix_fields() and
Item_cond::eval_not_null_tables() to not threat user parameters as
constants. This will ensure that we don't do the LEFT_JOIN -> INNER
JOIN conversion that causes problems.

There is also some things that needs to be improved regarding
calculations of not_null_tables_cache as we get a different value for
WHERE 1 or t1.a=1
compared to
WHERE t1.a= or 1

Changes done:
- Mark Item_param with the PARAM flag to be able to quickly check
  in Item_cond::eval_not_null_tables() if an item contains a
  prepared statement parameter (just like we check for stored procedure
  parameters).
- Fixed that Item_cond::not_null_tables_cache is not depending on
  order of arguments.
- Don't call item->eval_const_cond() for items that are NOT on the top
  level of the WHERE clause. This removed a lot of unnecessary
  warnings in the test suite!
- Do not reset not_null_tables_cache for not top level items.
- Simplified Item_cond::fix_fields by calling eval_not_null_tables()
  instead of having duplication of all the code in
  eval_not_null_tables().
- Return an error if Item_cond::fix_field() generates an error
  The old code did generate an error in some cases, but not in all
   cases.
  - Fixed all handling of the above error in make_cond_for_tables().
    The error handling by the callers did not exists before which
    could lead to asserts in many different places in the old code).
  - All changes in sql_select.cc are just checking the return value of
    fix_fields() and make_cond_for_tables() and returning an error
    value if fix_fields() returns true or make_cond_for_tables()
    returns NULL and is_error() is set.
- Mark Item_cond as const_item if all arguments returns true for
  can_eval_in_optimize().

Reviewer: Sergei Petrunia <sergey@mariadb.com>

Signed-off-by: Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@knielsen-hq.org>

Signed-off-by: Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@knielsen-hq.org>

Remove the exception that InnoDB does not report auto-increment locks waits
to the parallel replication.

There was an assumption that these waits could not cause conflicts with
in-order parallel replication and thus need not be reported. However, this
assumption is wrong and it is possible to get conflicts that lead to hangs
for the duration of --innodb-lock-wait-timeout. This can be seen with three
transactions:

1. T1 is waiting for T3 on an autoinc lock
2. T2 is waiting for T1 to commit
3. T3 is waiting on a normal row lock held by T2

Here, T3 needs to be deadlock killed on the wait by T1.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@knielsen-hq.org>

Restore code to make InnoDB choose the second transaction as a deadlock
victim if two transactions deadlock that need to commit in-order for
parallel replication. This code was erroneously removed when VATS was
implemented in InnoDB.

Also add a test case for InnoDB choosing the right deadlock victim.
Also fixes this bug, with testcase that reliably reproduces:

MDEV-28776: rpl.rpl_mark_optimize_tbl_ddl fails with timeout on sync_with_master
Reviewed-by: Marko Mäkelä <marko.makela@mariadb.com>
Signed-off-by: Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@knielsen-hq.org>

Restore code to make InnoDB choose the second transaction as a deadlock
victim if two transactions deadlock that need to commit in-order for
parallel replication. This code was erroneously removed when VATS was
implemented in InnoDB.

Also add a test case for InnoDB choosing the right deadlock victim.
Also fixes this bug, with testcase that reliably reproduces:

MDEV-28776: rpl.rpl_mark_optimize_tbl_ddl fails with timeout on sync_with_master

Note: This should be null-merged to 10.6, as a different fix is needed
there due to InnoDB locking code changes.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@knielsen-hq.org>

Remove the exception that InnoDB does not report auto-increment locks waits
to the parallel replication.

There was an assumption that these waits could not cause conflicts with
in-order parallel replication and thus need not be reported. However, this
assumption is wrong and it is possible to get conflicts that lead to hangs
for the duration of --innodb-lock-wait-timeout. This can be seen with three
transactions:

1. T1 is waiting for T3 on an autoinc lock
2. T2 is waiting for T1 to commit
3. T3 is waiting on a normal row lock held by T2

Here, T3 needs to be deadlock killed on the wait by T1.

Note: This should be null-merged to 10.6, as a different fix is needed
there due to InnoDB lock code changes.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@knielsen-hq.org>

The test innodb.alter_rename_files rather frequently hangs in
checkpoint_set_now. The test was removed in MariaDB Server 10.5
commit 37e7bde1 when the code that
it aimed to cover was simplified. Starting with MariaDB Server 10.5
the page flushing and log checkpointing is much simpler, handled
by the single buf_flush_page_cleaner() thread.

Let us remove the test to avoid occasional failures. We are not going
to fix the cause of the failure in MariaDB Server 10.4.