1. 29 Jun, 2007 3 commits
    • gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz's avatar
      Merge gkodinov@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-opt · 9a9263a3
      gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
      into  magare.gmz:/home/kgeorge/mysql/autopush/B27333-gcov-5.0-opt
      9a9263a3
    • gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz's avatar
      Bug#27333: subquery grouped for aggregate of outer · 38172240
      gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
      query / no aggregate of subquery
       The optimizer counts the aggregate functions that 
       appear as top level expressions (in all_fields) in 
       the current subquery. Later it makes a list of these
       that it uses to actually execute the aggregates in
       end_send_group().
       That count is used in several places as a flag whether
       there are aggregates functions.
       While collecting the above info it must not consider
       aggregates that are not aggregated in the current 
       context. It must treat them as normal expressions 
       instead. Not doing that leads to incorrect data about
       the query, e.g. running a query that actually has no
       aggregate functions as if it has some (and hence is
       expected to return only one row).
       Fixed by ignoring the aggregates that are not aggregated
       in the current context. 
       One other smaller omission discovered and fixed in the 
       process : the place of aggregation was not calculated for
       user defined functions. Fixed by calling 
       Item_sum::init_sum_func_check() and 
       Item_sum::check_sum_func() as it's done for the rest of 
       the aggregate functions.
      38172240
    • holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none)'s avatar
      Merge bk@192.168.21.1:mysql-5.0-opt · 2fafcb1e
      holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
      into  mysql.com:/home/hf/work/29247/my50-29247
      2fafcb1e
  2. 28 Jun, 2007 1 commit
  3. 27 Jun, 2007 2 commits
    • mhansson@dl145s.mysql.com's avatar
      Merge mhansson@bk-internal.mysql.com:/home/bk/mysql-5.0-opt · a90ff737
      mhansson@dl145s.mysql.com authored
      into  dl145s.mysql.com:/dev/shm/mhansson/my50-bug28677
      a90ff737
    • gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz's avatar
      Bug #26642: create index corrupts table definition in .frm · 0b421fad
      gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
        
        Thanks to Martin Friebe for finding and submitting a fix for this bug!
        
        A table with maximum number of key segments and maximum length key name
        would have a corrupted .frm file, due to an incorrect calculation of the
        complete key length.  Now the key length is computed correctly (I hope) :-)
        
        MyISAM would reject a table with the maximum number of keys and the maximum
        number of key segments in all keys.  It would allow one less than this total
        maximum.  Now MyISAM accepts a table defined with the maximum.  (This is a
        very minor issue.)
      0b421fad
  4. 26 Jun, 2007 3 commits
  5. 25 Jun, 2007 6 commits
  6. 24 Jun, 2007 3 commits
    • igor@olga.mysql.com's avatar
      Merge olga.mysql.com:/home/igor/mysql-5.0-opt · da416060
      igor@olga.mysql.com authored
      into  olga.mysql.com:/home/igor/dev-opt/mysql-5.0-opt-bug25602
      da416060
    • gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc's avatar
      Merge gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0 · 684d0ced
      gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
      into  gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
      684d0ced
    • igor@olga.mysql.com's avatar
      Fixed bug #25602. A query with DISTINCT in the select list to which · 59b9077c
      igor@olga.mysql.com authored
      the loose scan optimization for grouping queries was applied returned 
      a wrong result set when the query was used with the SQL_BIG_RESULT
      option.
      
      The SQL_BIG_RESULT option forces to use sorting algorithm for grouping
      queries instead of employing a suitable index. The current loose scan
      optimization is applied only for one table queries when the suitable
      index is covering. It does not make sense to use sort algorithm in this
      case. However the create_sort_index function does not take into account
      the possible choice of the loose scan to implement the DISTINCT operator
      which makes sorting unnecessary. Moreover the current implementation of
      the loose scan for queries with distinct assumes that sorting will
      never happen. Thus in this case create_sort_index should not call
      the function filesort.
      59b9077c
  7. 23 Jun, 2007 3 commits
  8. 22 Jun, 2007 9 commits
  9. 21 Jun, 2007 10 commits