No commit message

No commit message

No commit message

No commit message

Part three:
Fix some search paths.

IN ALTER TABLE ... ADD UNIQUE KEY

A bogus debug assertion failure occurred when reporting a duplicate
key on a column prefix of a CHAR column.

This is a regression from Bug#14729221 IN-PLACE ALTER TABLE REPORTS ''
INSTEAD OF REAL DUPLICATE VALUE FOR PREFIX KEYS. The assertion is only
present when UNIV_DEBUG is defined (which it is in debug builds
starting from MySQL 5.5). It is a case of overasserting.

Fix approved by Inaam Rana on IM.

Merge from mysql-5.1 into mysql-5.5.

Moved explicit instantiation of available_buffer and valid_buffer_range 
template functions to sql/log_event.cc.

Null merge from mysql-5.1 into mysql-5.5.

Merge bundle on mysql-5.5.

Merge bundle on mysql-5.1.

When a DML statement is issued, and if the index merge 
access method is chosen, then many rows from the
storage engine will be locked because of the way the
algorithm works.  Many rows will be locked, but they
will not be part of the final result set.

To reduce the excessive locking, the locks of unmatched
rows are released by this patch.  This patch will 
affect only transactions with isolation level
equal to or less stricter than READ COMMITTED. This is
because of the behaviour of ha_innobase::unlock_row().

rb://1296 approved by jorgen and olav.

Problem:-
When we execute a query which has subquery with GROUP BY, ORDER BY and have a
BLOB column,results a memory leak.

Analysis:-
In case of subquery, which have GROUP BY on BLOB and a ORDER BY on other field
and BLOB is not a key. We allocate a tmp buffer to copy_field to take care of
BLOB value.This copy_field value can have copies of its in two join(objects),
so while freeing this copy_field we have to take care that it is
not deleted twice.
The double deletion of tmp_table_param.copy_field is handled by two patches.

One by Kostja :
revid:sp1r-konstantin@mysql.com-20050627101056-55153
Fix the broken test suite in -debug build.

and other by Oleksandr
revid:sp1r-bell@sanja.is.com.ua-20060118114857-19905
Excluded posibility of tmp_table_param.copy_field double deletion (BUG#14851).

both of this patches are commited in different branch and while
merging they both get placed,but there is no need for Kostja patch as Oleksandr
patch handle this.


sql/sql_select.cc:
  Bug13726751, tmp_join clean up is not necessary as later in the code we are taking care of cleaning up of tmp_join copy_field.

Problem:-
When we execute a query which has subquery with GROUP BY, ORDER BY and have a
BLOB column,results a memory leak.

Analysis:-
In case of subquery, which have GROUP BY on BLOB and a ORDER BY on other field
and BLOB is not a key. We allocate a tmp buffer to copy_field to take care of
BLOB value.This copy_field value can have copies of its in two join(objects),
so while freeing this copy_field we have to take care that it is
not deleted twice.
The double deletion of tmp_table_param.copy_field is handled by two patches.

One by Kostja :
revid:sp1r-konstantin@mysql.com-20050627101056-55153
Fix the broken test suite in -debug build.

and other by Oleksandr
revid:sp1r-bell@sanja.is.com.ua-20060118114857-19905
Excluded posibility of tmp_table_param.copy_field double deletion (BUG#14851).

both of this patches are commited in different branch and while
merging they both get placed,but there is no need for Kostja patch as Oleksandr
patch handle this.


sql/sql_select.cc:
  Bug13726751, tmp_join clean up is not necessary as later in the code we are taking care of cleaning up of tmp_join copy_field.

LEN <= SIZEOF(ULONGLONG)

This bug was caught in the WL#6255 ALTER TABLE...ADD COLUMN in MySQL
5.6, but there is a bug in all InnoDB versions that support
auto-increment columns.

row_search_autoinc_read_column(): When reading the maximum value of
the auto-increment column, and the column only contains NULL values,
return 0. This corresponds to the case when the table is empty in
row_search_max_autoinc().

rb:1415 approved by Sunny Bains

removing .... will re-add using merge. for some reason initial mysql-5.1 version is not connected to mysql-5.5

No commit message

mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable
$UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe.

Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe,
within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on
even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash
with a fancy symlink).

Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi
(in perl).

(backport)

rb://1334
approved by: Inaam Rana

No commit message

mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable
$UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe.

Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe,
within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on
even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash
with a fancy symlink).

Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi
(in perl).

(backport)

manual merge

rb://1334
approved by: Inaam Rana

mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable
$UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe.

Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe,
within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on
even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash
with a fancy symlink).

Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi
(in perl).

Problem:-
using last_insert_id() on an auto_incremented bigint unsigned does
not work for values which are greater than max-bigint-signed.

Analysis:-
last_insert_id() returns the first auto_incremented value for a column
and an auto_incremented value can have only positive values.

In our code, when we are initializing a last_insert_id object, we are
taking it as a signed BIGINT, So when the auto_incremented value reaches
greater than max signed bigint, last_insert_id gives negative result.

Solution:
When we are fetching the value from last_insert_id, We are setting the 
unsigned_flag, so that it take only unsigned BIGINT value.

sql/item_func.cc:
  here unsigned value is converted to signed value.
sql/item_func.h:
  last_insert_id() gives an auto_incremented value which can be
  positive only,so defined it as a unsigned longlong sets the
  unsigned_flag to 1.

Problem:-
using last_insert_id() on an auto_incremented bigint unsigned does
not work for values which are greater than max-bigint-signed.

Analysis:-
last_insert_id() returns the first auto_incremented value for a column
and an auto_incremented value can have only positive values.

In our code, when we are initializing a last_insert_id object, we are
taking it as a signed BIGINT, So when the auto_incremented value reaches
greater than max signed bigint, last_insert_id gives negative result.

Solution:
When we are fetching the value from last_insert_id, We are setting the 
unsigned_flag, so that it take only unsigned BIGINT value.

sql/item_func.cc:
  here unsigned value is converted to signed value.
sql/item_func.h:
  last_insert_id() gives an auto_incremented value which can be
  positive only,so defined it as a unsigned longlong sets the
  unsigned_flag to 1.

No commit message

No commit message