1. 19 Oct, 2012 3 commits
    • Joerg Bruehe's avatar
      Upmerge a backport - empty · b761fe36
      Joerg Bruehe authored
      b761fe36
    • Joerg Bruehe's avatar
      Automerge into main 5.1 · 86b311fb
      Joerg Bruehe authored
      86b311fb
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      Bug #14226171 EXCESSIVE ROW LOCKING WITH UPDATE IN 5.5.25 · 6ff71d0d
      Annamalai Gurusami authored
      When a DML statement is issued, and if the index merge 
      access method is chosen, then many rows from the
      storage engine will be locked because of the way the
      algorithm works.  Many rows will be locked, but they
      will not be part of the final result set.
      
      To reduce the excessive locking, the locks of unmatched
      rows are released by this patch.  This patch will 
      affect only transactions with isolation level
      equal to or less stricter than READ COMMITTED. This is
      because of the behaviour of ha_innobase::unlock_row().
      
      rb://1296 approved by jorgen and olav.
      6ff71d0d
  2. 18 Oct, 2012 4 commits
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#13726751 - 8 BYTE MEMORY LEAK IN DO_SAVE_BLOB · 44beb951
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Problem:-
      When we execute a query which has subquery with GROUP BY, ORDER BY and have a
      BLOB column,results a memory leak.
      
      Analysis:-
      In case of subquery, which have GROUP BY on BLOB and a ORDER BY on other field
      and BLOB is not a key. We allocate a tmp buffer to copy_field to take care of
      BLOB value.This copy_field value can have copies of its in two join(objects),
      so while freeing this copy_field we have to take care that it is
      not deleted twice.
      The double deletion of tmp_table_param.copy_field is handled by two patches.
      
      One by Kostja :
      revid:sp1r-konstantin@mysql.com-20050627101056-55153
      Fix the broken test suite in -debug build.
      
      and other by Oleksandr
      revid:sp1r-bell@sanja.is.com.ua-20060118114857-19905
      Excluded posibility of tmp_table_param.copy_field double deletion (BUG#14851).
      
      both of this patches are commited in different branch and while
      merging they both get placed,but there is no need for Kostja patch as Oleksandr
      patch handle this.
      
      
      sql/sql_select.cc:
        Bug13726751, tmp_join clean up is not necessary as later in the code we are taking care of cleaning up of tmp_join copy_field.
      44beb951
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#13726751 - 8 BYTE MEMORY LEAK IN DO_SAVE_BLOB · eef1a195
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Problem:-
      When we execute a query which has subquery with GROUP BY, ORDER BY and have a
      BLOB column,results a memory leak.
      
      Analysis:-
      In case of subquery, which have GROUP BY on BLOB and a ORDER BY on other field
      and BLOB is not a key. We allocate a tmp buffer to copy_field to take care of
      BLOB value.This copy_field value can have copies of its in two join(objects),
      so while freeing this copy_field we have to take care that it is
      not deleted twice.
      The double deletion of tmp_table_param.copy_field is handled by two patches.
      
      One by Kostja :
      revid:sp1r-konstantin@mysql.com-20050627101056-55153
      Fix the broken test suite in -debug build.
      
      and other by Oleksandr
      revid:sp1r-bell@sanja.is.com.ua-20060118114857-19905
      Excluded posibility of tmp_table_param.copy_field double deletion (BUG#14851).
      
      both of this patches are commited in different branch and while
      merging they both get placed,but there is no need for Kostja patch as Oleksandr
      patch handle this.
      
      
      sql/sql_select.cc:
        Bug13726751, tmp_join clean up is not necessary as later in the code we are taking care of cleaning up of tmp_join copy_field.
      eef1a195
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. · f9389d58
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      f9389d58
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#14758405: ALTER TABLE: ADDING SERIAL NULL DATATYPE: ASSERTION: · 52ea1522
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      LEN <= SIZEOF(ULONGLONG)
      
      This bug was caught in the WL#6255 ALTER TABLE...ADD COLUMN in MySQL
      5.6, but there is a bug in all InnoDB versions that support
      auto-increment columns.
      
      row_search_autoinc_read_column(): When reading the maximum value of
      the auto-increment column, and the column only contains NULL values,
      return 0. This corresponds to the case when the table is empty in
      row_search_max_autoinc().
      
      rb:1415 approved by Sunny Bains
      52ea1522
  3. 17 Oct, 2012 9 commits
  4. 16 Oct, 2012 5 commits
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#11745891 - LAST_INSERT(ID) DOES NOT SUPPORT BIGINT UNSIGNED · 510d048b
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Problem:-
      using last_insert_id() on an auto_incremented bigint unsigned does
      not work for values which are greater than max-bigint-signed.
      
      Analysis:-
      last_insert_id() returns the first auto_incremented value for a column
      and an auto_incremented value can have only positive values.
      
      In our code, when we are initializing a last_insert_id object, we are
      taking it as a signed BIGINT, So when the auto_incremented value reaches
      greater than max signed bigint, last_insert_id gives negative result.
      
      Solution:
      When we are fetching the value from last_insert_id, We are setting the 
      unsigned_flag, so that it take only unsigned BIGINT value.
      
      sql/item_func.cc:
        here unsigned value is converted to signed value.
      sql/item_func.h:
        last_insert_id() gives an auto_incremented value which can be
        positive only,so defined it as a unsigned longlong sets the
        unsigned_flag to 1.
      510d048b
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#11745891 - LAST_INSERT(ID) DOES NOT SUPPORT BIGINT UNSIGNED · bdb4104c
      Neeraj Bisht authored
      Problem:-
      using last_insert_id() on an auto_incremented bigint unsigned does
      not work for values which are greater than max-bigint-signed.
      
      Analysis:-
      last_insert_id() returns the first auto_incremented value for a column
      and an auto_incremented value can have only positive values.
      
      In our code, when we are initializing a last_insert_id object, we are
      taking it as a signed BIGINT, So when the auto_incremented value reaches
      greater than max signed bigint, last_insert_id gives negative result.
      
      Solution:
      When we are fetching the value from last_insert_id, We are setting the 
      unsigned_flag, so that it take only unsigned BIGINT value.
      
      sql/item_func.cc:
        here unsigned value is converted to signed value.
      sql/item_func.h:
        last_insert_id() gives an auto_incremented value which can be
        positive only,so defined it as a unsigned longlong sets the
        unsigned_flag to 1.
      bdb4104c
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · 5f37d738
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      5f37d738
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. · bb371b64
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      bb371b64
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#14729221 IN-PLACE ALTER TABLE REPORTS '' INSTEAD OF · aec62476
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      REAL DUPLICATE VALUE FOR PREFIX KEYS
      
      innobase_rec_to_mysql(): Invoke dict_index_get_nth_col_or_prefix_pos()
      instead of dict_index_get_nth_col_pos() to find the column.
      aec62476
  5. 15 Oct, 2012 3 commits
    • Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com's avatar
      removed warning message as they have changed in mysql-5.6 and mysql-trunk and... · 04c77300
      removed warning message as they have changed in mysql-5.6 and mysql-trunk and this is left over from changes that got up-merged 
      04c77300
    • Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com's avatar
      · ed6732dd
      bug#14704286
      SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
      LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)
      
      If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
      query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
      secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.
      
      If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
      secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
      for this condition. Added hook for this check.
      
      -----
      Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
      read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
      ed6732dd
    • Krunal Bauskar krunal.bauskar@oracle.com's avatar
      · 9bfc910f
      bug#14704286
      SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE
      LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index)
      
      If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this
      query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for
      secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in.
      
      If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing
      secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check
      for this condition. Added hook for this check.
      
      -----
      Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent
      read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
      9bfc910f
  6. 12 Oct, 2012 2 commits
  7. 10 Oct, 2012 2 commits
  8. 09 Oct, 2012 6 commits
  9. 08 Oct, 2012 4 commits
    • Praveenkumar Hulakund's avatar
      Bug#11756600 - SLAVE THREAD CAN CRASH IF EVENT SCHEDULER · 35a05a60
      Praveenkumar Hulakund authored
                     FAILS TO READ EVENT TABLE AT STARTUP.
      
      This issue is fixed in 5.5+ versions. This patch adds a test
      case for this scenario.
      35a05a60
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      Bug #14036214 MYSQLD CRASHES WHEN EXECUTING UPDATE IN TRX WITH · 378a7d1e
      Annamalai Gurusami authored
      CONSISTENT SNAPSHOT OPTION
      
      A transaction is started with a consistent snapshot.  After 
      the transaction is started new indexes are added to the 
      table.  Now when we issue an update statement, the optimizer
      chooses an index.  When the index scan is being initialized
      via ha_innobase::change_active_index(), InnoDB reports 
      the error code HA_ERR_TABLE_DEF_CHANGED, with message 
      stating that "insufficient history for index".
      
      This error message is propagated up to the SQL layer.  But
      the my_error() api is never called.  The statement level
      diagnostics area is not updated with the correct error 
      status (it remains in Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY).  
      
      Hence the following check in the Protocol::end_statement()
      fails.
      
       516   case Diagnostics_area::DA_EMPTY:
       517   default:
       518     DBUG_ASSERT(0);
       519     error= send_ok(thd->server_status, 0, 0, 0, NULL);
       520     break;
      
      The fix is to backport the fix of bugs 14365043, 11761652 
      and 11746399. 
      
      14365043 PROTOCOL::END_STATEMENT(): ASSERTION `0' FAILED
      11761652 HA_RND_INIT() RESULT CODE NOT CHECKED
      11746399 RETURN VALUES OF HA_INDEX_INIT() AND INDEX_INIT() IGNORED
      
      rb://1227 approved by guilhem and mattiasj.
      378a7d1e
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Merge mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5. · 52a4ef95
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      Also, add debug check for trx_id sanity to row_upd_rec_sys_fields().
      52a4ef95
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Bug#14731482 UPDATE OR DELETE CORRUPTS A RECORD WITH A LONG PRIMARY KEY · b0662086
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      We did not allocate enough bits for index->trx_id_offset, causing an
      UPDATE or DELETE of a table with a PRIMARY KEY longer than 1024 bytes
      to corrupt the PRIMARY KEY.
      
      dict_index_t: Allocate enough bits.
      
      dict_index_build_internal_clust(): Check for overflow of
      index->trx_id_offset. Trip a debug assertion when overflow occurs.
      
      rb:1380 approved by Jimmy Yang
      b0662086
  10. 04 Oct, 2012 1 commit
    • Jon Olav Hauglid's avatar
      Bug#14640599 MEMORY LEAK WHEN EXECUTING STORED ROUTINE EXCEPTION HANDLER · bfba296d
      Jon Olav Hauglid authored
      When a SP handler is activated, memory is allocated to hold the
      MESSAGE_TEXT for the condition that caused the activation.
      
      The problem was that this memory was allocated on the MEM_ROOT belonging
      to the stored program. Since this MEM_ROOT is not freed until the
      stored program ends, a stored program that causes lots of handler
      activations can start using lots of memory. In 5.1 and earlier the
      problem did not exist as no MESSAGE_TEXT was allocated if a condition
      was raised with a handler present. However, this behavior lead to
      a number of other issues such as Bug#23032.
      
      This patch fixes the problem by allocating enough memory for the
      necessary MESSAGE_TEXTs in the SP MEM_ROOT when the SP starts and
      then re-using this memory each time a handler is activated.
            
      This is the 5.5 version of the patch.
      bfba296d
  11. 03 Oct, 2012 1 commit
    • Tor Didriksen's avatar
      Bug#13713525 CREATE_INITIAL_DB.CMAKE IS FAILING ON WINDOWS, STILL "DEVENV" RETURNS 0 · 30d35590
      Tor Didriksen authored
      This bug depends on cmake version.
      
      For cmake 2.6 (which is still in use for some pushbuild trees)
      the main build would succeed, even if create_initial_db failed.
      
      The problem was the chaining of commands in the CUSTOM_COMMAND
      to produce 'initdb.dep'. It first invokes cmake to run mysqld,
      then invokes 'touch' to create the file. Moving the 'touch'
      command makes the error propagate properly for both cmake 2.6 and 2.8
      
      30d35590