1. 16 Nov, 2021 2 commits
  2. 11 Nov, 2021 2 commits
  3. 09 Nov, 2021 5 commits
  4. 08 Nov, 2021 3 commits
  5. 05 Nov, 2021 1 commit
    • Andrei Elkin's avatar
      MDEV-26833 Missed statement rollback in case transaction drops or create temporary table · 561b6c7e
      Andrei Elkin authored
      When transaction creates or drops temporary tables and afterward its statement
      faces an error even the transactional table statement's cached ROW
      format events get involved into binlog and are visible after the transaction's commit.
      
      Fixed with proper analysis of whether the errored-out statement needs
      to be rolled back in binlog.
      For instance a fact of already cached CREATE or DROP for temporary
      tables by previous statements alone
      does not cause to retain the being errored-out statement events in the
      cache.
      Conversely, if the statement creates or drops a temporary table
      itself it can't be rolled back - this rule remains.
      561b6c7e
  6. 04 Nov, 2021 1 commit
  7. 03 Nov, 2021 1 commit
  8. 02 Nov, 2021 3 commits
  9. 01 Nov, 2021 2 commits
    • Jan Lindström's avatar
      MDEV-23328 Server hang due to Galera lock conflict resolution · ea239034
      Jan Lindström authored
      * Fix error handling NULL-pointer reference
      * Add mtr-suppression on galera_ssl_upgrade
      ea239034
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      MDEV-26949 --debug-gdb installs redundant signal handlers · 026984c3
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      There is a server startup option --gdb a.k.a. --debug-gdb that requests
      signals to be set for more convenient debugging. Most notably, SIGINT
      (ctrl-c) will not be ignored, and you will be able to interrupt the
      execution of the server while GDB is attached to it.
      
      When we are debugging, the signal handlers that would normally display
      a terse stack trace are useless.
      
      When we are debugging with rr, the signal handlers may interfere with
      a SIGKILL that could be sent to the process by the environment, and ruin
      the rr replay trace, due to a Linux kernel bug
      https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/10/31/311
      
      To be able to diagnose bugs in kill+restart tests, we may really need
      both a trace before the SIGKILL and a trace of the failure after a
      subsequent server startup. So, we had better avoid hitting the problem
      by simply not installing those signal handlers.
      026984c3
  10. 30 Oct, 2021 2 commits
  11. 29 Oct, 2021 3 commits
    • Alexander Barkov's avatar
      MDEV-24901 SIGSEGV in fts_get_table_name, SIGSEGV in ib_vector_size, SIGSEGV... · 059797ed
      Alexander Barkov authored
      MDEV-24901 SIGSEGV in fts_get_table_name, SIGSEGV in ib_vector_size, SIGSEGV in row_merge_fts_doc_tokenize, stack smashing
      
      strmake() puts one extra 0x00 byte at the end of the string.
      The code in my_strnxfrm_tis620[_nopad] did not take this into
      account, so in the reported scenario the 0x00 byte was put outside
      of a stack variable, which made ASAN crash.
      
      This problem is already fixed in in MySQL:
      
        commit 19bd66fe43c41f0bde5f36bc6b455a46693069fb
        Author: bin.x.su@oracle.com <>
        Date:   Fri Apr 4 11:35:27 2014 +0800
      
      But the fix does not seem to be correct, as it breaks when finds a zero byte
      in the source string.
      
      Using memcpy() instead of strmake().
      
      - Unlike strmake(), memcpy() it does not write beyond the destination
        size passed.
      - Unlike the MySQL fix, memcpy() does not break on the first 0x00 byte found
        in the source string.
      059797ed
    • sjaakola's avatar
      MDEV-23328 Server hang due to Galera lock conflict resolution · db50ea3a
      sjaakola authored
      Mutex order violation when wsrep bf thread kills a conflicting trx,
      the stack is
      
                wsrep_thd_LOCK()
                wsrep_kill_victim()
                lock_rec_other_has_conflicting()
                lock_clust_rec_read_check_and_lock()
                row_search_mvcc()
                ha_innobase::index_read()
                ha_innobase::rnd_pos()
                handler::ha_rnd_pos()
                handler::rnd_pos_by_record()
                handler::ha_rnd_pos_by_record()
                Rows_log_event::find_row()
                Update_rows_log_event::do_exec_row()
                Rows_log_event::do_apply_event()
                Log_event::apply_event()
                wsrep_apply_events()
      
      and mutexes are taken in the order
      
                lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex -> victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data
      
      When a normal KILL statement is executed, the stack is
      
                innobase_kill_query()
                kill_handlerton()
                plugin_foreach_with_mask()
                ha_kill_query()
                THD::awake()
                kill_one_thread()
      
              and mutexes are
      
                victim_thread->LOCK_thd_data -> lock_sys->mutex -> victim_trx->mutex
      
      This patch is the plan D variant for fixing potetial mutex locking
      order exercised by BF aborting and KILL command execution.
      
      In this approach, KILL command is replicated as TOI operation.
      This guarantees total isolation for the KILL command execution
      in the first node: there is no concurrent replication applying
      and no concurrent DDL executing. Therefore there is no risk of
      BF aborting to happen in parallel with KILL command execution
      either. Potential mutex deadlocks between the different mutex
      access paths with KILL command execution and BF aborting cannot
      therefore happen.
      
      TOI replication is used, in this approach,  purely as means
      to provide isolated KILL command execution in the first node.
      KILL command should not (and must not) be applied in secondary
      nodes. In this patch, we make this sure by skipping KILL
      execution in secondary nodes, in applying phase, where we
      bail out if applier thread is trying to execute KILL command.
      This is effective, but skipping the applying of KILL command
      could happen much earlier as well.
      
      This also fixed unprotected calls to wsrep_thd_abort
      that will use wsrep_abort_transaction. This is fixed
      by holding THD::LOCK_thd_data while we abort transaction.
      Reviewed-by: default avatarJan Lindström <jan.lindstrom@mariadb.com>
      db50ea3a
    • Jan Lindström's avatar
      MDEV-25114: Crash: WSREP: invalid state ROLLED_BACK (FATAL) · c8b39f7e
      Jan Lindström authored
      Revert "MDEV-23328 Server hang due to Galera lock conflict resolution"
      
      This reverts commit 29bbcac0.
      c8b39f7e
  12. 28 Oct, 2021 7 commits
  13. 27 Oct, 2021 3 commits
    • Sergei Petrunia's avatar
      Fix compile warning: · 3a9967d7
      Sergei Petrunia authored
      ha_rocksdb.h:459:15: warning: 'table_type' overrides a member
      function but is not marked 'override' [-Winconsistent-missing-override]
      3a9967d7
    • Alexander Barkov's avatar
      MDEV-25402 Assertion `!str || str != Ptr' failed in String::copy · 2ed148c8
      Alexander Barkov authored
      The assert inside String::copy() prevents copying from from "str"
      if its own String::Ptr also points to the same memory.
      
      The idea of the assert is that copy() performs memory reallocation,
      and this reallocation can free (and thus invalidate) the memory pointed by Ptr,
      which can lead to further copying from a freed memory.
      
      The assert was incomplete: copy() can free the memory pointed by its Ptr
      only if String::alloced is true!
      
      If the String is not alloced, it is still safe to copy even from
      the location pointed by Ptr.
      
      This scenario demonstrates a safe copy():
        const char *tmp= "123";
        String str1(tmp, 3);
        String str2(tmp, 3);
        // This statement is safe:
        str2.copy(str1->ptr(), str1->length(), str1->charset(), cs_to, &errors);
      
      Inside the copy() the parameter "str" is equal to String::Ptr in this example.
      But it's still ok to reallocate the memory for str2, because str2
      was a constant before the copy() call. Thus reallocation does not
      make the memory pointed by str1->ptr() invalid.
      
      Adjusting the assert condition to allow copying for constant strings.
      2ed148c8
    • Marko Mäkelä's avatar
      Fix tests for PLUGIN_PARTITION=NO · 4b8340d8
      Marko Mäkelä authored
      4b8340d8
  14. 26 Oct, 2021 5 commits