- 21 Oct, 2012 3 commits
-
-
Nuno Carvalho authored
Null merge from mysql-5.1 into mysql-5.5.
-
Nuno Carvalho authored
Merge bundle on mysql-5.5.
-
Nuno Carvalho authored
Merge bundle on mysql-5.1.
-
- 19 Oct, 2012 4 commits
-
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
-
Joerg Bruehe authored
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
When a DML statement is issued, and if the index merge access method is chosen, then many rows from the storage engine will be locked because of the way the algorithm works. Many rows will be locked, but they will not be part of the final result set. To reduce the excessive locking, the locks of unmatched rows are released by this patch. This patch will affect only transactions with isolation level equal to or less stricter than READ COMMITTED. This is because of the behaviour of ha_innobase::unlock_row(). rb://1296 approved by jorgen and olav.
-
- 18 Oct, 2012 4 commits
-
-
Neeraj Bisht authored
Problem:- When we execute a query which has subquery with GROUP BY, ORDER BY and have a BLOB column,results a memory leak. Analysis:- In case of subquery, which have GROUP BY on BLOB and a ORDER BY on other field and BLOB is not a key. We allocate a tmp buffer to copy_field to take care of BLOB value.This copy_field value can have copies of its in two join(objects), so while freeing this copy_field we have to take care that it is not deleted twice. The double deletion of tmp_table_param.copy_field is handled by two patches. One by Kostja : revid:sp1r-konstantin@mysql.com-20050627101056-55153 Fix the broken test suite in -debug build. and other by Oleksandr revid:sp1r-bell@sanja.is.com.ua-20060118114857-19905 Excluded posibility of tmp_table_param.copy_field double deletion (BUG#14851). both of this patches are commited in different branch and while merging they both get placed,but there is no need for Kostja patch as Oleksandr patch handle this. sql/sql_select.cc: Bug13726751, tmp_join clean up is not necessary as later in the code we are taking care of cleaning up of tmp_join copy_field.
-
Neeraj Bisht authored
Problem:- When we execute a query which has subquery with GROUP BY, ORDER BY and have a BLOB column,results a memory leak. Analysis:- In case of subquery, which have GROUP BY on BLOB and a ORDER BY on other field and BLOB is not a key. We allocate a tmp buffer to copy_field to take care of BLOB value.This copy_field value can have copies of its in two join(objects), so while freeing this copy_field we have to take care that it is not deleted twice. The double deletion of tmp_table_param.copy_field is handled by two patches. One by Kostja : revid:sp1r-konstantin@mysql.com-20050627101056-55153 Fix the broken test suite in -debug build. and other by Oleksandr revid:sp1r-bell@sanja.is.com.ua-20060118114857-19905 Excluded posibility of tmp_table_param.copy_field double deletion (BUG#14851). both of this patches are commited in different branch and while merging they both get placed,but there is no need for Kostja patch as Oleksandr patch handle this. sql/sql_select.cc: Bug13726751, tmp_join clean up is not necessary as later in the code we are taking care of cleaning up of tmp_join copy_field.
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
LEN <= SIZEOF(ULONGLONG) This bug was caught in the WL#6255 ALTER TABLE...ADD COLUMN in MySQL 5.6, but there is a bug in all InnoDB versions that support auto-increment columns. row_search_autoinc_read_column(): When reading the maximum value of the auto-increment column, and the column only contains NULL values, return 0. This corresponds to the case when the table is empty in row_search_max_autoinc(). rb:1415 approved by Sunny Bains
-
- 17 Oct, 2012 9 commits
-
-
-
removing .... will re-add using merge. for some reason initial mysql-5.1 version is not connected to mysql-5.5
-
-
Tatjana Azundris Nuernberg authored
-
Tatjana Azundris Nuernberg authored
mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable $UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe. Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe, within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash with a fancy symlink). Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi (in perl). (backport)
-
Yasufumi Kinoshita authored
rb://1334 approved by: Inaam Rana
-
Tatjana Azundris Nuernberg authored
mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable $UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe. Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe, within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash with a fancy symlink). Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi (in perl). (backport) manual merge
-
Yasufumi Kinoshita authored
rb://1334 approved by: Inaam Rana
-
Tatjana Azundris Nuernberg authored
mysqld_safe script did not heed MySQL specific environment variable $UMASK, leading to divergent behavior between mysqld and mysqld_safe. Patch adds an approximation of mysqld's behavior to mysqld_safe, within the bounds dictated by attempt to have mysqld_safe run on even the most basic of shells (proper '70s sh, not just bash with a fancy symlink). Patch also adds approximation of said behavior to mysqld_multi (in perl).
-
- 16 Oct, 2012 5 commits
-
-
Neeraj Bisht authored
Problem:- using last_insert_id() on an auto_incremented bigint unsigned does not work for values which are greater than max-bigint-signed. Analysis:- last_insert_id() returns the first auto_incremented value for a column and an auto_incremented value can have only positive values. In our code, when we are initializing a last_insert_id object, we are taking it as a signed BIGINT, So when the auto_incremented value reaches greater than max signed bigint, last_insert_id gives negative result. Solution: When we are fetching the value from last_insert_id, We are setting the unsigned_flag, so that it take only unsigned BIGINT value. sql/item_func.cc: here unsigned value is converted to signed value. sql/item_func.h: last_insert_id() gives an auto_incremented value which can be positive only,so defined it as a unsigned longlong sets the unsigned_flag to 1.
-
Neeraj Bisht authored
Problem:- using last_insert_id() on an auto_incremented bigint unsigned does not work for values which are greater than max-bigint-signed. Analysis:- last_insert_id() returns the first auto_incremented value for a column and an auto_incremented value can have only positive values. In our code, when we are initializing a last_insert_id object, we are taking it as a signed BIGINT, So when the auto_incremented value reaches greater than max signed bigint, last_insert_id gives negative result. Solution: When we are fetching the value from last_insert_id, We are setting the unsigned_flag, so that it take only unsigned BIGINT value. sql/item_func.cc: here unsigned value is converted to signed value. sql/item_func.h: last_insert_id() gives an auto_incremented value which can be positive only,so defined it as a unsigned longlong sets the unsigned_flag to 1.
-
unknown authored
No commit message
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
REAL DUPLICATE VALUE FOR PREFIX KEYS innobase_rec_to_mysql(): Invoke dict_index_get_nth_col_or_prefix_pos() instead of dict_index_get_nth_col_pos() to find the column.
-
- 15 Oct, 2012 3 commits
-
-
removed warning message as they have changed in mysql-5.6 and mysql-trunk and this is left over from changes that got up-merged
-
bug#14704286 SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index) If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in. If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check for this condition. Added hook for this check. ----- Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
-
bug#14704286 SECONDARY INDEX UPDATES MAKE CONSISTENT READS DO O(N^2) UNDO PAGE LOOKUPS (honoring kill query while accessing sec_index) If secondary index is being used for select query evaluation and this query is operating with consistent read snapshot it might take good time for secondary index to return back control to mysql as MVCC would kick in. If user issues "kill query <id>" while query is actively accessing secondary index it will not be honored as there is no hook to check for this condition. Added hook for this check. ----- Parallely secondary index taking too long to evaluate for consistent read snapshot case is being examined for performance improvement. WL#6540.
-
- 12 Oct, 2012 4 commits
-
-
Marc Alff authored
-
Marc Alff authored
This fix resolves a security vulnerability of SHOW PROFILE. See the bug report for details.
-
Nuno Carvalho authored
Merge from mysql-5.1 into mysql-5.5.
-
Nuno Carvalho authored
This bug had two problems: P1) Reads out of bounds; P2) Writes out of bounds. PROBLEM P1 ---------- User_var_log_event unmarshalling from binlog was not performing range checks when using name_len and val_len variables to walk on event buffer. Added range checks to User_var_log_event unmarshalling to prevent unmarshalling errors. PROBLEM P2 ---------- User_var_log_event value was allocated on thread stack, what caused stack frame errors when User_var_log_event value was bigger than thread stack size. Currently value is allocated on heap memory.
-
- 10 Oct, 2012 2 commits
-
-
Vasil Dimov authored
exist in 5.5).
-
Vasil Dimov authored
os/os0file.c:1332: error: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
-
- 09 Oct, 2012 6 commits
-
-
Vasil Dimov authored
-
Vasil Dimov authored
although the bug does not exist in 5.1/innodb.
-
Vasil Dimov authored
-
Vasil Dimov authored
The problem is in the error handling in row_create_table_for_mysql(). In the 'disk full' case we may forget to call dict_mem_table_free() on the table object. Approved by: Marko (rb:1377 and rb:1386)
-
Harin Vadodaria authored
PRIVILEGES Description: (user,host) pair from security context is used privilege checking at the time of granting or revoking proxy privileges. This creates problem when server is started with --skip-name-resolve option because host will not contain any value. Checks should be dependent on consistent values regardless the way server is started. Further, privilege check should use (priv_user,priv_host) pair rather than values obtained from inbound connection because this pair represents the correct account context obtained from mysql.user table.
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
-