To correctly decide which predicates can be evaluated with a given table
the optimizer must know the exact set of tables that a predicate depends 
on. If that mask is too wide (refer to non-existing tables) the optimizer
can erroneously skip a predicate.
One such case of wrong table usage mask were the aggregate functions.
The have a all-1 mask (meaning depend on all tables, including non-existent
ones).
Fixed by making a real used_tables mask for the aggregates. The mask is
constructed in the following way :
1. OR the table dependency masks of all the arguments of the aggregate.
2. If all the arguments of the function are from the local name resolution 
  context and it is evaluated in the same name resolution
  context where it is referenced all the tables from that name resolution 
  context are OR-ed to the dependency mask. This is to denote that an
  aggregate function depends on the number of rows it processes.
3. Handle correctly the case of an aggregate function optimization (such that
  the aggregate function can be pre-calculated and made a constant).

Made sure that an aggregate function is never a constant (unless subject of a 
specific optimization and pre-calculation).  

One other flaw was revealed and fixed in the process : references were 
not calling the recalculation method for used_tables of their targets.

Objects of the classes Item_func_is_not_null_test and Item_func_trig_cond
must be transparent for the method Item::split_sum_func2 as these classes
are pure helpers. It means that the method Item::split_sum_func2 should
look at those objects as at pure wrappers.

identical pushed_cond_guards arrays. Allocate only one always.

- Make the code produce correct result: use an array of triggers to turn on/off equalities for each
  compared column. Also turn on/off optimizations based on those equalities.
- Make EXPLAIN output show "Full scan on NULL key" for tables for which we switch between
  ref/unique_subquery/index_subquery and ALL access.
- index_subquery engine now has HAVING clause when it is needed, and it is
  displayed in EXPLAIN EXTENDED
- Fix incorrect presense of "Using index" for index/unique-based subqueries (BUG#22930)
// bk trigger note: this commit refers to BUG#24127

When transforming "oe IN (SELECT ie ...)" wrap the pushed-down predicates
iff "oe can be null", not "ie can be null".
The fix doesn't cover row-based subqueries, those will be fixed in #24127.

Evaluate "NULL IN (SELECT ...)" in a special way: Disable pushed-down 
conditions and their "consequences": 
 = Do full table scans instead of unique_[index_subquery] lookups.
 = Change appropriate "ref_or_null" accesses to full table scans in
   subquery's joins.
Also cache value of NULL IN (SELECT ...) if the SELECT is not correlated 
wrt any upper select.