- 29 Jun, 2007 3 commits
-
-
antony@anubis.xiphis.org authored
into anubis.xiphis.org:/usr/home/antony/work/5.0-engines-merge
-
antony@anubis.xiphis.org authored
into anubis.xiphis.org:/usr/home/antony/work/p2-bug25513.5
-
antony@ppcg5.local authored
-
- 28 Jun, 2007 3 commits
-
-
antony@ppcg5.local authored
"Federared Transactions Failure" Bug occurs when the user performs an operation which inserts more than one row into the federated table and the federated table references a remote table stored within a transactional storage engine. When the insert operation for any one row in the statement fails due to constraint violation, the federated engine is unable to perform statement rollback and so the remote table contains a partial commit. The user would expect a statement to perform the same so a statement rollback is expected. This bug was fixed by implementing bulk-insert handling into the federated storage engine. This will relieve the bug for most common situations by enabling the generation of a multi-row insert into the remote table and thus permitting the remote table to perform statement rollback when neccessary. The multi-row insert is limited to the maximum packet size between servers and should the size overflow, more than one insert statement will be sent and this bug will reappear. Multi-row insert is disabled when an "INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE" is being performed. The bulk-insert handling will offer a significant performance boost when inserting a large number of small rows. This patch builds on Bug29019 and Bug25511
-
antony@ppcg5.local authored
"Federated INSERT failures" Federated does not correctly handle "INSERT...ON DUPLICATE KEY UPDATE" However, implementing such support is not reasonably possible without increasing complexity of the storage engine: checking that constraints on remote server match local server and parsing error messages. This patch causes 'ON DUPLICATE KEY' to fail with ER_DUP_KEY message if a conflict occurs and not to fail silently.
-
antony@ppcg5.local authored
"REPLACE/INSERT IGNORE/UPDATE IGNORE doesn't work" Federated does not record neccessary HA_EXTRA flags in order to support REPLACE/INSERT IGNORE/UPDATE IGNORE. Implement ::extra() to capture flags neccessary for functionality. New function append_ident() to better escape identifiers consistantly.
-
- 27 Jun, 2007 1 commit
-
-
svoj@mysql.com/june.mysql.com authored
CHECK TABLE against ARCHIVE table may falsely report table corruption, or cause server crash. Fixed by using proper buffer for CHECK TABLE. Affects both 5.0 and 5.1.
-
- 25 Jun, 2007 3 commits
-
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
into gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
into gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
into gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/4.1-opt
-
- 24 Jun, 2007 4 commits
-
-
igor@olga.mysql.com authored
into olga.mysql.com:/home/igor/dev-opt/mysql-5.0-opt-bug25602
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
Max compressed file size was calculated incorretly causing server crash on INSERT. With this patch we use proper max file size provided by zlib. Affects 5.0 only.
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
into gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
-
igor@olga.mysql.com authored
the loose scan optimization for grouping queries was applied returned a wrong result set when the query was used with the SQL_BIG_RESULT option. The SQL_BIG_RESULT option forces to use sorting algorithm for grouping queries instead of employing a suitable index. The current loose scan optimization is applied only for one table queries when the suitable index is covering. It does not make sense to use sort algorithm in this case. However the create_sort_index function does not take into account the possible choice of the loose scan to implement the DISTINCT operator which makes sorting unnecessary. Moreover the current implementation of the loose scan for queries with distinct assumes that sorting will never happen. Thus in this case create_sort_index should not call the function filesort.
-
- 23 Jun, 2007 3 commits
-
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
into gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
into gleb.loc:/home/uchum/work/bk/5.0-opt
-
gshchepa/uchum@gleb.loc authored
INSERT into table from SELECT from the same table with ORDER BY and LIMIT was inserting other data than sole SELECT ... ORDER BY ... LIMIT returns. One part of the patch for bug #9676 improperly pushed LIMIT to temporary table in the presence of the ORDER BY clause. That part has been removed.
-
- 22 Jun, 2007 9 commits
-
-
joerg@trift2. authored
into trift2.:/MySQL/M50/push-5.0
-
joerg@trift2. authored
to be run only if it is available on the machine.
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
into magare.gmz:/home/kgeorge/mysql/autopush/B28400-5.0-opt
-
gkodinov/kgeorge@magare.gmz authored
The C optimizer may decide that data access operations through pointer of different type are not related to the original data (strict aliasing). This is what happens in fetch_long_with_conversion(), when called as part of mysql_stmt_fetch() : it tries to check for truncation errors by first storing float (and other types of data) into a char * buffer and then accesses them through a float pointer. This is done to prevent the effects of excess precision when using FPU registers. However the doublestore() macro converts a double pointer to an union pointer. This violates the strict aliasing rule. Fixed by making the intermediary variables volatile ( to not re-introduce the excess precision bug) and using the intermediary value instead of the char * buffer. Note that there can be loss of precision for both signed and unsigned 64 bit integers converted to double and back, so the check must stay there (even for compatibility reasons). Based on the excellent analysis in bug 28400.
-
joerg@trift2. authored
into trift2.:/MySQL/M50/push-5.0
-
tsmith@maint1.mysql.com authored
into maint1.mysql.com:/data/localhome/tsmith/bk/maint/50
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/28839/my50-28839
-
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none) authored
-
dkatz@damien-katzs-computer.local authored
The reason the "reap;" succeeds unexpectedly is because the query was completing(almost always) and the network buffer was big enough to store the query result (sometimes) on Windows, meaning the response was completely sent before the server thread could be killed. Therefore we use a much longer running query that doesn't have a chance to fully complete before the reap happens, testing the kill properly.
-
- 21 Jun, 2007 14 commits
-
-
igor@olga.mysql.com authored
into olga.mysql.com:/home/igor/dev-opt/mysql-5.0-opt-bug29104
-
tsmith@maint1.mysql.com authored
into maint1.mysql.com:/data/localhome/tsmith/bk/maint/50
-
tsmith@maint1.mysql.com authored
into maint1.mysql.com:/data/localhome/tsmith/bk/maint/50
-
tsmith@maint1.mysql.com authored
into maint1.mysql.com:/data/localhome/tsmith/bk/maint/41
-
iggy@amd64.(none) authored
into amd64.(none):/src/bug27029/my50-bug27029
-
iggy@amd64.(none) authored
- When creating an index for the sort, the number of rows plus 1 is used to allocate a buffer. In this test case, the number of rows 4294967295 is the max value of an unsigned integer, so when 1 was added to it, a buffer of size 0 was allocated causing the crash. - Create new test suite for this bug's test suite as per QA.
-
tsmith@maint1.mysql.com authored
into maint1.mysql.com:/data/localhome/tsmith/bk/maint/50
-
lars/lthalmann@dl145j.mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/nfsdisk1/lars/bk/mysql-5.0-rpl
-
-
msvensson@pilot.(none) authored
-
msvensson@pilot.(none) authored
into pilot.(none):/data/msvensson/mysql/mysql-5.0-maint
-
msvensson@pilot.(none) authored
into pilot.(none):/data/msvensson/mysql/mysql-5.0-maint
-
holyfoot/hf@hfmain.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/hf/work/28839/my50-28839
-
holyfoot/hf@mysql.com/hfmain.(none) authored
-