1. 17 May, 2013 1 commit
  2. 16 May, 2013 15 commits
  3. 15 May, 2013 4 commits
  4. 14 May, 2013 1 commit
    • Shubhangi Garg's avatar
      Bug#16607258 :Linker Errors Due To Inclusion Of An Implementation File · af806dfc
      Shubhangi Garg authored
                                 In log_event.h
            
      DESCRIPTION:
      Due to inclusion of an implementation file, namely 'rpl_tblmap.cc'
      in a header file, namely 'log_event.h'; linker errors occur if
      log_event.h is included in an application containing multiple source
      files, such as in the case of Binlog API.
            
      Binlog API requires including log_event.h in its source files;
      which leads to multiple definition errors, for functions defined
      in rpl_tblmap.cc for class 'table_mapping'.
                  
      FIX:
      Change the inclusion from header file(log_event.h) to source files
      using this header and have flag MYSQL_CLIENT set. The only file in
      the current server repository is mysqlbinlog.cc.
      
      client/mysqlbinlog.cc:
        Pulled in code of rpl_tblmap.cc
      sql/log_event.h:
        Removed inclusion of the implementation file from this header file
      af806dfc
  5. 13 May, 2013 4 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Bug#14529666 INNODB_BUFFER_PAGE DOES NOT MARK CHANGE BUFFER PAGES APPROPRIATELY · b1777c21
      unknown authored
      == Analysis == 
      Both change buffer pages and on-disk indexes pages are marked as
      FIL_PAGE_INDEX. So all ibuf index pages will classify as INDEX with NULL
      table_name and index_name.
      
      == Solution ==
      A new page type for ibuf data pages named I_S_PAGE_TYPE_IBUF is defined. All
      these pages whose index_id equal (DICT_IBUF_ID_MIN + IBUF_SPACE_ID) will 
      classify as IBUF_DATA instead of INDEX in INNODB_BUFFER_PAGE 
      and INNODB_BUFFER_PAGE_LRU.
      
      This fix is only for IS reporting, both on-disk and buffer pool structures
      keep unchanged.
      
      Approved by both Marko and Jimmy. rb#2334
      b1777c21
    • Neeraj Bisht's avatar
      Bug#12328597 - MULTIPLE COUNT(DISTINCT) IN SAME SELECT FALSE · 0edb58b1
      Neeraj Bisht authored
                     WITH COMPOSITE KEY COLUMNS
      
      Problem:-
      While running a SELECT query with several AGGR(DISTINCT) function 
      and these are referring to different field of same composite key, 
      Returned incorrect value.
      
      Analysis:-
      
      In a table, where we have composite key like (a,b,c)
      and when we give a query like
      
      select COUNT(DISTINCT b), SUM(DISTINCT a) from ....
      
      here, we first make a list of items in Aggr(distinct) function
      (which is a, b), where order of item doesn't matter. 
      and then we see, whether we have a composite key where the prefix 
      of index columns matches the items of the aggregation function.
      (in this case we have a,b,c).
      
      if yes, so we can use loose index scan and we need not perform 
      duplicate removal to distinct in our aggregate function.
      
      In our table, we traverse column marked with <-- and get the result as
      (a,b,c)      count(distinct b)           sum(distinct a)
                   treated as count b          treated as sum(a)
      (1,1,2)<--              1                      1		
      (1,2,2)<--              1++=2                  1+1=2
      (1,2,3)		
      (2,1,2)<--              2++=3                  1+1+2=4
      (2,2,2)<--              3++=4                  1+1+2+2=6
      (2,2,3)
      
      result will be 4,6, but it should be (2,3)
      
      As in this case, our assumption is incorrect. If we have
      query like 
      select count(distinct a,b), sum(distinct a,b)from ..
      then we can use loose index scan
      
      Solution:-
      In our query, when we have more then one aggr(distinct) function 
      then they should refer to same  fields like
      
      select count(distinct a,b), sum(distinct a,b) from .. 
      
      -->we can use loose scan index as both aggr(distinct) refer to same fields a,b.
      
      If they are referring to different field like
      
      select count(distinct a), sum(distinct b) from .. 
      
      -->will not use loose scan index as both aggr(distinct) refer to different fields.
      0edb58b1
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      64caebec
    • unknown's avatar
      No commit message · d8bfdd18
      unknown authored
      No commit message
      d8bfdd18
  6. 12 May, 2013 2 commits
  7. 10 May, 2013 4 commits
  8. 09 May, 2013 1 commit
  9. 08 May, 2013 1 commit
    • Jon Olav Hauglid's avatar
      Bug#16779374: NEW ERROR MESSAGE ADDED TO 5.5 AFTER 5.6 GA - REUSING · f5c9cacb
      Jon Olav Hauglid authored
                    NUMBER ALREADY USED BY 5.6
      
      The problem was that the patch for Bug#13004581 added a new error
      message to 5.5. This causes it to use an error number already used
      in 5.6 by ER_CANNOT_LOAD_FROM_TABLE_V2. Which means that error
      message number stability between GA releases is broken.
      
      This patch fixes the problem by removing the error message and
      using ER_UNKNOWN_ERROR instead.
      f5c9cacb
  10. 07 May, 2013 5 commits
    • Chaithra Gopalareddy's avatar
      Merge from 5.1 to 5.5 · ccc7bde8
      Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
      ccc7bde8
    • Chaithra Gopalareddy's avatar
      Bug #16119355: PREPARED STATEMENT: READ OF FREED MEMORY WITH · c9bccdc3
      Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
                                 STRING CONVERSION FUNCTIONS
                  
      Problem:
      While executing the prepared statement, user variable is
      set to memory which would be freed at the end of
      execution.
      If the statement is executed again, valgrind throws
      error when accessing this pointer.
                  
      Analysis:
                  
      1. First time when Item_func_set_user_var::check is called,
      memory is allocated for "value" to store the result.
      (In the call to copy_if_not_alloced).
      2. While sending the result, Item_func_set_user_var::check
      is called again. But, this time, its called with
      "use_result_field" set to true. 
      As a result, we call result_field->val_str(&value).
      3. Here memory allocated for "value" gets freed. And "value"
      gets set to "result_field", with "str_length" being that of
      result_field's.
      4. In the call to JOIN::cleanup, result_field's memory gets
      freed as this is allocated in a chunk as part of the
      temporary table which is needed to execute the query.
      5. Next time, when execute of the same statement is called,
      "value" will be set to memory which is already freed.
      Valgrind error occurs as "str_length" is positive 
      (set at Step 3)
                  
      Note that user variables list is stored as part of the Lex object
      in set_var_list. Hence the persistance across executions.
            
      Solution:
      Patch for Bug#11764371 fixed in mysql-5.6+ fixes this problem 
      as well.So backporting the same.
            
      In the solution for Bug#11764371, we create another object of 
      user_var and repoint it to temp_table's field. As a result while 
      deleting the alloced buffer in Step 3, since the cloned object 
      does not own the buffer, deletion will not happen.
      So at step 5 when we execute the statement second time, the 
      original object will be used and since deletion did not happen 
      valgrind will not complain about dangling pointer.
      
      
      sql/item_func.h:
        Add constructors.
      sql/sql_select.cc:
        Change user variable assignment functions to read from fields after
        tables have been unlocked.
      c9bccdc3
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      5.1 -> 5.5 merge · ad500141
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      ad500141
    • Sergey Glukhov's avatar
      Bug#16095534 CRASH: PREPARED STATEMENT CRASHES IN ITEM_BOOL_FUNC2::FIX_LENGTH_AND_DEC · b562cbe7
      Sergey Glukhov authored
      The problem happened due to broken left expression in Item_in_optimizer object.
      In case of the bug left expression is runtime created Item_outer_ref item which
      is deleted at the end of the statement and one of Item_in_optimizer arguments
      becomes bad when re-executed. The fix is to use real_item() instead of original
      left expression. Note: It feels a bit weird that after preparing, the field is
      directly part of the generated Item_func_eq, whereas in execution it is replaced
      with an Item_outer_ref wrapper object.
      
      
      sql/item_subselect.cc:
        use left_expr->real_item() instead of original left expression
        because left_expr can be runtime created Ref item which is deleted
        at the end of the statement. Thus one of 'substitution' arguments
        can be broken in case of PS.
      b562cbe7
    • Sujatha Sivakumar's avatar
      Bug#16513588:"PREPARE_COMMIT_MUTEX" IS NOT FREED DURING · 2d4b76b8
      Sujatha Sivakumar authored
      TRANSACTION ROLLBACK
      
      Problem:
      =======
      "prepare_commit_mutex" is acquired during "innobase_xa_prepare"
      and it is freed only in "innobase_commit". After prepare,
      if the commit operation fails the transaction is rolled back
      but the mutex is not released.
      
      Analysis:
      ========
      During transaction commit process transaction is prepared and
      the "prepare_commit_mutex" is acquired to preserve the order
      of commit. After prepare write to binlog is initiated.
      
      File: sql/handler.cc
            if (error || (is_real_trans && xid &&
      ----->             (error= !(cookie= tc_log->log_xid(thd, xid)))))
            {
              ha_rollback_trans(thd, all);
      
      In the above code "tc_log->log_xid" operation fails.
      
      When the write to binlog fails the transaction is rolled back
      with out freeing the mutex. A subsequent "INSERT" operation
      tries to acquire the same mutex during its commit process
      and the server aborts.
      
      Fix:
      ===
      "prepare_commit_mutex" is freed during "innobase_rollback".
      
      storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc:
        Added code to free "prepare_commit_mutex"
      2d4b76b8
  11. 06 May, 2013 2 commits
    • Annamalai Gurusami's avatar
      Merge from mysql-5.1 to mysql-5.5 · 58ba9695
      Annamalai Gurusami authored
      58ba9695
    • Jon Olav Hauglid's avatar
      Bug#16757869: INNODB: POSSIBLE REGRESSION IN 5.5.31, BUG#16004999 · 1767d9e8
      Jon Olav Hauglid authored
      The problem was that if UPDATE with subselect caused a
      deadlock inside InnoDB, this deadlock was not properly
      handled by the SQL layer. This meant that the SQL layer
      would try to unlock the row after InnoDB had rolled
      back the transaction. This caused an assertion inside
      InnoDB.
        
      This patch fixes the problem by checking for errors
      reported by SQL_SELECT::skip_record() and not calling
      unlock_row() if any errors have been reported.
      
      This bug is similar to Bug#13586591, but for UPDATE
      rather than DELETE. Similar issues in filesort/opt_range/
      sql_select will be investigated and handled in the scope
      of Bug#16767929
      1767d9e8