- 17 May, 2013 1 commit
-
-
unknown authored
No commit message
-
- 16 May, 2013 15 commits
-
-
sayantan dutta authored
-
Mattias Jonsson authored
The problem was in get_partition_id_cols_range_for_endpoint and cmp_rec_and_tuple_prune, which stepped one partition too long. Solution was to move a small portion of logic to cmp_rec_and_tuple_prune, to simplify both get_partition_id_cols_range_for_endpoint and get_partition_id_cols_list_for_endpoint.
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
ibuf_insert_to_index_page_low() add a DBUG_RETURN(NULL).
-
sayantan dutta authored
-
sayantan dutta authored
-
sayantan dutta authored
-
sayantan dutta authored
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
INSERT BUFFER MERGE Problem: When the record is merged from the change buffer to the actual page, in a particular condition, it is assumed that the deleted rec will be re-used by the inserted rec. With this assumption the lock is restored on the pointer to the deleted rec itself, thinking that it is pointing to the newly inserted rec. Solution: Just before restoring the lock, update the rec pointer to point to the newly inserted record. An assert has been added to verify this. This assert will fail without the fix and will pass with the fix. rb#2449 in review by Marko and Jimmy
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
-
Jon Olav Hauglid authored
-
Jon Olav Hauglid authored
In order to keep error message numbers stable between GA releases, we can not now add a new error message to 5.1/5.5 as this message would get a number now used in 5.6. This patch enforces this by adding a 5.1/5.5 specific check when processing the error message file. If a new error message is added, building will abort and report an error.
-
unknown authored
No commit message
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
INSERT BUFFER MERGE Problem: When the record is merged from the change buffer to the actual page, in a particular condition, it is assumed that the deleted rec will be re-used by the inserted rec. With this assumption the lock is restored on the pointer to the deleted rec itself, thinking that it is pointing to the newly inserted rec. Solution: Just before restoring the lock, update the rec pointer to point to the newly inserted record. An assert has been added to verify this. This assert will fail without the fix and will pass with the fix. rb#2449 in review by Marko and Jimmy
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
INNODB_FAST_SHUTDOWN IS 2 Problem: When innodb_fast_shutdown is set to 2 and the master thread enters flush loop, under some circumstances it will not be able to exit it. This may lead to a shutdown hanging. This is happening because of the following: 1. In the flush_loop block of code, if the srv_fast_shutdown is equal to 2 (very fast shutdown), then we do not flush dirty pages in buffer pool to disk. 2. In the same flush_loop block of code, if the number of dirty pages is more than user specified limit, we go to step 1. This results in infinite loop. Solution: When we are in the process of doing a very fast shutdown, don't do step 2 above. rb#2328 approved by Inaam.
-
- 15 May, 2013 4 commits
-
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
-
Marko Mäkelä authored
When a record contains no user data bytes (such as when the PRIMARY KEY is an empty string and all secondary index fields are NULL or the empty string), page_zip_decompress() could fail to set the record heap_no correctly. page_zip_decompress_node_ptrs(), page_zip_decompress_sec(), page_zip_decompress_clust(): Set heap_no also at the end of the compressed data stream. rb#2448 approved by Jimmy Yang and Inaam Rana
-
Inaam Rana authored
AFTER A ROW IS READ Approved by: Sunny Bains rb://2425 Don't release concurrency tickets when asked to release btr_search_latch. This is a 5.5 only bug. It is already fixed in 5.6 upwards.
-
unknown authored
No commit message
-
- 14 May, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Shubhangi Garg authored
In log_event.h DESCRIPTION: Due to inclusion of an implementation file, namely 'rpl_tblmap.cc' in a header file, namely 'log_event.h'; linker errors occur if log_event.h is included in an application containing multiple source files, such as in the case of Binlog API. Binlog API requires including log_event.h in its source files; which leads to multiple definition errors, for functions defined in rpl_tblmap.cc for class 'table_mapping'. FIX: Change the inclusion from header file(log_event.h) to source files using this header and have flag MYSQL_CLIENT set. The only file in the current server repository is mysqlbinlog.cc. client/mysqlbinlog.cc: Pulled in code of rpl_tblmap.cc sql/log_event.h: Removed inclusion of the implementation file from this header file
-
- 13 May, 2013 4 commits
-
-
unknown authored
== Analysis == Both change buffer pages and on-disk indexes pages are marked as FIL_PAGE_INDEX. So all ibuf index pages will classify as INDEX with NULL table_name and index_name. == Solution == A new page type for ibuf data pages named I_S_PAGE_TYPE_IBUF is defined. All these pages whose index_id equal (DICT_IBUF_ID_MIN + IBUF_SPACE_ID) will classify as IBUF_DATA instead of INDEX in INNODB_BUFFER_PAGE and INNODB_BUFFER_PAGE_LRU. This fix is only for IS reporting, both on-disk and buffer pool structures keep unchanged. Approved by both Marko and Jimmy. rb#2334
-
Neeraj Bisht authored
WITH COMPOSITE KEY COLUMNS Problem:- While running a SELECT query with several AGGR(DISTINCT) function and these are referring to different field of same composite key, Returned incorrect value. Analysis:- In a table, where we have composite key like (a,b,c) and when we give a query like select COUNT(DISTINCT b), SUM(DISTINCT a) from .... here, we first make a list of items in Aggr(distinct) function (which is a, b), where order of item doesn't matter. and then we see, whether we have a composite key where the prefix of index columns matches the items of the aggregation function. (in this case we have a,b,c). if yes, so we can use loose index scan and we need not perform duplicate removal to distinct in our aggregate function. In our table, we traverse column marked with <-- and get the result as (a,b,c) count(distinct b) sum(distinct a) treated as count b treated as sum(a) (1,1,2)<-- 1 1 (1,2,2)<-- 1++=2 1+1=2 (1,2,3) (2,1,2)<-- 2++=3 1+1+2=4 (2,2,2)<-- 3++=4 1+1+2+2=6 (2,2,3) result will be 4,6, but it should be (2,3) As in this case, our assumption is incorrect. If we have query like select count(distinct a,b), sum(distinct a,b)from .. then we can use loose index scan Solution:- In our query, when we have more then one aggr(distinct) function then they should refer to same fields like select count(distinct a,b), sum(distinct a,b) from .. -->we can use loose scan index as both aggr(distinct) refer to same fields a,b. If they are referring to different field like select count(distinct a), sum(distinct b) from .. -->will not use loose scan index as both aggr(distinct) refer to different fields.
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
-
unknown authored
No commit message
-
- 12 May, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
innobase_convert_to_filename_charset() was by mistake kept within the conditional compilation of UNIV_COMPILE_TEST_FUNCS. Now placing the function out of UNIV_COMPILE_TEST_FUNCS. Also, removed the unnecessary log message (as in 5.6+).
-
- 10 May, 2013 4 commits
-
-
Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
-
Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
Reverting fix for Bug#16119355 in 5.1 as this needs two patches from 5.5+ to work for a certain case
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
is included only in the builtin InnoDB, and it is missed in InnoDB plugin. Adding this function in InnoDB plugin as well.
-
- 09 May, 2013 1 commit
-
-
unknown authored
No commit message
-
- 08 May, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Jon Olav Hauglid authored
NUMBER ALREADY USED BY 5.6 The problem was that the patch for Bug#13004581 added a new error message to 5.5. This causes it to use an error number already used in 5.6 by ER_CANNOT_LOAD_FROM_TABLE_V2. Which means that error message number stability between GA releases is broken. This patch fixes the problem by removing the error message and using ER_UNKNOWN_ERROR instead.
-
- 07 May, 2013 5 commits
-
-
Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
-
Chaithra Gopalareddy authored
STRING CONVERSION FUNCTIONS Problem: While executing the prepared statement, user variable is set to memory which would be freed at the end of execution. If the statement is executed again, valgrind throws error when accessing this pointer. Analysis: 1. First time when Item_func_set_user_var::check is called, memory is allocated for "value" to store the result. (In the call to copy_if_not_alloced). 2. While sending the result, Item_func_set_user_var::check is called again. But, this time, its called with "use_result_field" set to true. As a result, we call result_field->val_str(&value). 3. Here memory allocated for "value" gets freed. And "value" gets set to "result_field", with "str_length" being that of result_field's. 4. In the call to JOIN::cleanup, result_field's memory gets freed as this is allocated in a chunk as part of the temporary table which is needed to execute the query. 5. Next time, when execute of the same statement is called, "value" will be set to memory which is already freed. Valgrind error occurs as "str_length" is positive (set at Step 3) Note that user variables list is stored as part of the Lex object in set_var_list. Hence the persistance across executions. Solution: Patch for Bug#11764371 fixed in mysql-5.6+ fixes this problem as well.So backporting the same. In the solution for Bug#11764371, we create another object of user_var and repoint it to temp_table's field. As a result while deleting the alloced buffer in Step 3, since the cloned object does not own the buffer, deletion will not happen. So at step 5 when we execute the statement second time, the original object will be used and since deletion did not happen valgrind will not complain about dangling pointer. sql/item_func.h: Add constructors. sql/sql_select.cc: Change user variable assignment functions to read from fields after tables have been unlocked.
-
Sergey Glukhov authored
-
Sergey Glukhov authored
The problem happened due to broken left expression in Item_in_optimizer object. In case of the bug left expression is runtime created Item_outer_ref item which is deleted at the end of the statement and one of Item_in_optimizer arguments becomes bad when re-executed. The fix is to use real_item() instead of original left expression. Note: It feels a bit weird that after preparing, the field is directly part of the generated Item_func_eq, whereas in execution it is replaced with an Item_outer_ref wrapper object. sql/item_subselect.cc: use left_expr->real_item() instead of original left expression because left_expr can be runtime created Ref item which is deleted at the end of the statement. Thus one of 'substitution' arguments can be broken in case of PS.
-
Sujatha Sivakumar authored
TRANSACTION ROLLBACK Problem: ======= "prepare_commit_mutex" is acquired during "innobase_xa_prepare" and it is freed only in "innobase_commit". After prepare, if the commit operation fails the transaction is rolled back but the mutex is not released. Analysis: ======== During transaction commit process transaction is prepared and the "prepare_commit_mutex" is acquired to preserve the order of commit. After prepare write to binlog is initiated. File: sql/handler.cc if (error || (is_real_trans && xid && -----> (error= !(cookie= tc_log->log_xid(thd, xid))))) { ha_rollback_trans(thd, all); In the above code "tc_log->log_xid" operation fails. When the write to binlog fails the transaction is rolled back with out freeing the mutex. A subsequent "INSERT" operation tries to acquire the same mutex during its commit process and the server aborts. Fix: === "prepare_commit_mutex" is freed during "innobase_rollback". storage/innobase/handler/ha_innodb.cc: Added code to free "prepare_commit_mutex"
-
- 06 May, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Annamalai Gurusami authored
-
Jon Olav Hauglid authored
The problem was that if UPDATE with subselect caused a deadlock inside InnoDB, this deadlock was not properly handled by the SQL layer. This meant that the SQL layer would try to unlock the row after InnoDB had rolled back the transaction. This caused an assertion inside InnoDB. This patch fixes the problem by checking for errors reported by SQL_SELECT::skip_record() and not calling unlock_row() if any errors have been reported. This bug is similar to Bug#13586591, but for UPDATE rather than DELETE. Similar issues in filesort/opt_range/ sql_select will be investigated and handled in the scope of Bug#16767929
-