Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
N
neoppod
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
1
Issues
1
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
2
Merge Requests
2
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
nexedi
neoppod
Commits
24780e8e
Commit
24780e8e
authored
Mar 09, 2016
by
Julien Muchembled
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
BUGS: possible "uuid" conflict issue after clients got disconnected from the master
parent
eee74faf
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
21 additions
and
0 deletions
+21
-0
BUGS.rst
BUGS.rst
+21
-0
No files found.
BUGS.rst
View file @
24780e8e
...
...
@@ -16,6 +16,27 @@ Although this should happen rarely enough not to affect performance, this can
be an issue if your application can't afford restarting the transaction,
e.g. because it interacted with external environment.
(Z) Storage nodes rejecting clients after other clients got disconnected from the master
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Client nodes ignore the state of the connection to the master node when reading
data from storage, as long as their partition tables are recent enough. This
way, they are able to finish read-only transactions even if they can't reach
the master, which may be useful for high availability. The downside is that the
master node ignores their node ids are still used, which causes "uuid"
conflicts when reallocating them.
Since an unused NEO Storage should not insist in staying connected to master
node, solutions are:
- change the way node ids are generated (either random or always increasing),
- or make storage nodes reject clients that aren't known by the master, but
this drops the ability to perform read-only operations as described above
(a client that is not connected to the master would be forced to reconnect
before any query to the storage).
Workaround: restart clients that aren't connected to the master
(N) Storage failure or update may lead to POSException or break undoLog()
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment