version up: zc.buildout & core recipe eggs

stack/slapos.cfg

@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ eggs =
 [versions]
 setuptools = 44.0.0
 # Use SlapOS patched zc.buildout
-zc.buildout = 2.7.1+slapos003
+zc.buildout = 2.7.1+slapos004
 # Use SlapOS patched zc.recipe.egg (zc.recipe.egg 2.x is for Buildout 2)
 zc.recipe.egg = 2.0.3+slapos003
 # Use own version of h.r.download to be able to open .xz and .lz archives
@@ -160,9 +160,9 @@ slapos.core = 1.5.12
 slapos.extension.strip = 0.4
 slapos.extension.shared = 1.0
 slapos.libnetworkcache = 0.20
-slapos.rebootstrap = 4.4
-slapos.recipe.build = 0.44
-slapos.recipe.cmmi = 0.13
+slapos.rebootstrap = 4.5
+slapos.recipe.build = 0.45
+slapos.recipe.cmmi = 0.15
 slapos.toolbox = 0.109
 stevedore = 1.21.0
 subprocess32 = 3.5.3

[Jérome Perrin]

Is this what's causing the new The template install returned None. A path or iterable os paths should be returned. errors we now have on slapos.recipe.template tests ( here ) ?

[Jérome Perrin]

Ah I did not read properly, the test is here https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/slapos.recipe.template/blob/065564b057df9dbb5ad1951c1e0e4ee2d991eea7/slapos/recipe/template/README.jinja2.txt#L534-537 and the test asserts that there is this warning about install returning None, but the difference is that we no longer have the Unused options for template: 'extra'. warning.

Probably in the changes in buildout from https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/slapos.buildout/compare/2.7.1+slapos003...2.7.1+slapos004 we broke buildout's feature of reporting unused options because we "use" options in the new way of computing signatures.

[Julien Muchembled]

Yes, I wrote about in slapos.buildout@dffdeffc.