An error occurred fetching the project authors.
- 24 Apr, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Put auto-generated _getAcquireLocalRoles at the end of mro, removing it from Base. Also, document why it is treated specially here. Also, add _getAcquireLocalRoles methods on a few leaf classes whose instances fake being portal types, without actually being proper document instances. At least, the ones which are detected in unit tests. The proper fix would likely rather be to make them proper document classes, but this carries data migration concerns which go beyond the scope of this regression fix (_getAcquireLocalRoles was not possible to override anymore).
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
- 23 Apr, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
This allows code of movement group to still works when they use setter/getters defined by property sheets
-
- 19 Apr, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
Fully rewrite portal_simulation.mergeDeliveryList to use builders to reconstruct new merged delivery. Add parameter "merge_delivery" to builder. This parameter is used when merge should be done in such a way that movement group at delivery level are ignored
-
- 18 Apr, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Tatuya Kamada authored
For example, testReceiptRecoginition employs numpy matrix calculation methods that try to utilize all the CPU in the computer. This behavior is harmlfull when there are several testReciptRecongnition is running in a testnode which has 40 CPUs.
-
- 17 Apr, 2019 9 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
- 16 Apr, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Tristan Cavelier authored
To get the listbox cell value : code was getting last proxy target instead of browsing the full proxy target stack. /bug #20190111-1F86B7B https://nexedijs.erp5.net/#/bug_module/20190111-1F86B7B /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!856
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
- 15 Apr, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
- 12 Apr, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
We randomly have unkilled firefox process remaining. Make sure to kill them.
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
- 10 Apr, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
- 05 Apr, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
- 04 Apr, 2019 8 commits
-
-
Tristan Cavelier authored
/bug #20190204-1BF3A5A https://nexedijs.erp5.net/#/bug_module/20190204-1BF3A5A /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!848
-
Tristan Cavelier authored
-
Tristan Cavelier authored
- local_roles: ( Assignee OR Assignor ) AND other_unknown_id: value [All criterions (AND)_______ v] [-][local_roles_____________ v] -> |Type | -. [Equal to (at least one)_ v] |Modification Date| : [Assignee________________ ] |Title | : [Assignor________________ ] |Reference | : [________________________ ] |Description | : search_column_list |State | : [-][other_unknown_id________ v] |Searchable Text | : [Equal to________________ v] |Search Expression| -' [value___________________ ] |local_roles | -. |other_unknown_id | -' additional_search_column_list
-
Tristan Cavelier authored
- the "Equal to (at least one)" operator is displayed in the same listbox as "Equal to" and "Contains" ; - this filter item can have multiple input value field ; - one input value field has to be filled (required) like on the other filter items ; - when extended_search is `title: ( "One" OR "Two" )`, behavior changed : ________before________ ______________now______________ Filter Editor Filter Editor [ At least one (OR) v] [ All criterions (AND)______ v] [-][ Title_________ v] [-][ Title__________________ v] [ Equal to______ v] [ Equal to (at least one) v] [ One___________ x] [ One____________________ x] [-][ Title_________ v] [ Two____________________ x] [ Equal to______ v] [ _______________________ ] [ Two___________ x] [+] [+] Search bar Search bar [One][Two][ _______ ] [One][Two][ ________________ ]
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Activate copy/paste/delete buttons on form list and form view. When selection listbox lines, only use what is visible / checked. This is required because of list methods which do not support catalog queries. This changes the behaviour of mass workflow transition action and delete action, but at least, it is consistent everywhere now, and so, easier to explain (what you see is what you change).
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
The listboxes in mass delete / state change dialogs are only used to confirm the lines selection.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
- 03 Apr, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 29 Mar, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!852
-
- 28 Mar, 2019 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!850
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Introduce a new ERP5Site_resetAccountingTransactionLineGroupingReference script to reset grouping reference on accounting transaction lines. This solve a problem with the way we activated on AccountingTransactionLine_resetGroupingReference the context of the line, if line was removed from OFS before activity was executed, the activity was discarded and grouping references on related lines was not reset. Also drop the unused `keep_if_valid_group` parameter, it was not making sense. /reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!849
-
- 26 Mar, 2019 3 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Also, make some existing sanitation happen earlier than before, to store values in a cleaner format.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
- 25 Mar, 2019 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-