This make everything slow as hell and prevent to quickly save.

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-02

We choose Lax and not Strict so that we can open links to ERP5 from
external applications and so that OAuth Logins work. Implementing the
"two cookies, one for read one for write" approach suggested in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-rfc6265bis-02#section-8.8.2
would be too big change at this point.

SameSite=None breaks the compatibility with some browser versions.
https://www.chromium.org/updates/same-site/incompatible-clients

We should be able to configure a group calendar saying that the pattern
is "from 9:00 to 12:00, repeat every monday morning" with a group
calendar assignment saying "use this pattern from 01/01/2016 until
31/12/2016" and then create another group calendar assignment for 2017
without having to change the periodicity stop date on all presence
periods of the group calendar.

I think it should repeat from group calendar assignment's start date
until min(group calendar assignment's stop date, presence period's
periodicity stop date).


/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!125

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!940

 - update PresencePeriod.getNextPeriodicalDate with fixes from 6155f7ff
 - do not use addToDate, but simply DateTime arithmetics that unlike addToDate, works correctly

Shared parts received from test node will be passed as
SLAPOS_TEST_SHARED_PART_LIST environment variable to egg tests.

This will be useful for SLAPOS-SR tests.

Some test suites who install software during the test, such as SLAPOS-SR
tests, could benefit from reusing already installed shared parts.

The convention is that --shared_part_list is a os.pathsep (:) separated
list of paths of read-only shared parts in which the test is not allowed
to write.

Shared parts speed up compilation time and is becoming the standard in
SlapOS software installations, so it makes sense to use it in our test
nodes, as it also gives one more opportunity to test this feature.

erp5testnode configuration file supports a new shared_part_list option,
that can be set to a \n separated list of paths to use for shared parts,
following the same rules as slapos.core and slapos.recipe.cmmi (ie. the
first ones are read-only and the last one is read-write).

This shared_part_list option will be set in slapos.cfg used to compile
both the "software for testnode" (ie. selenium-runner) and later the
softwares under tests.
The software under tests will also use a local directory for each test
suite to install shared suite.

The directory structure is now:

  srv/
    shared/
      (shared parts to install selenium runner)
    slapos/
      soft/
        (selenium-runner software)
    testnode/
      foo/ # test suite with reference foo
        inst/
          (partitions of tested software)
        shared/
          (shared parts to install tested software)
        soft/
          (tested software)

and in the configuration srv/shared will be set as initial
shared_part_list.

When installing selenium-runner, srv/shared/ is used to write shared
parts. These shared parts are never removed.

When installing software under test, srv/shared/ and
srv/testnode/foo/shared/ are used. If parts are found in srv/shared they
are used, if they are not found, they are installed in
srv/testnode/foo/shared/.

In practice, this should mean that the shared parts installed by
selenium-runner will be reused for all tested softwares and this should
speed up initial installation of these softwares.

Currently, nothing is implemented regarding removal of unused shared
parts, but in our case:
 - srv/testnode/foo/shared/ will be removed when "foo" is removed.
 - srv/shared/ should be used only when installing selenium-runner.

If this starts to use too much disk space, one quick and dirty
workaround could be to destroy the test node instance and re-create it.

Use monaco editor with https://github.com/joe-re/sql-language-server
completion provider bundled in
https://lab.nexedi.com/jerome/monaco-editor-sql-completion-provider
This completion provider is not perfect, but codemirror's one was not so
good either. At least we can use monaco editor.

Also add a quick "copy to cliboard" feature, which copies the table as
html or in markdown format for text.

And also fix Server-Timing header that was an obsolete syntax no longer
supported by chrome.

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1036

The fixes from nexedi/erp5!630
were not enough, exceptions set on days were calendar did not repeat
were also confusing other exceptions after this.

Simplify implementation a lot, instead of keeping track of the next
exception date, start by building a set of all exceptions dates and
use membership of this set as a criterion to skip exceptions.

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1030

Allow python's cryptographically secure pseudorandom number generator for usage in restricted python and use it where it makes sense.

This also change the API of `Person_generatePassword` which no longer allow to control the number of letters and numbers.

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!847

This script no longer allow to control the number of letters and digit

Using same method as python 3.6's secrets module and a bit longer token
that what python currently recommends, since we were using very very
long tokens until now (so that it does not look like a "regression")

- use system random
- generate longer password with a larger space

API change in an incompatible way, it's no longer possible to control
the number of alpha and numeric. This was reducing a lot the number of
combinations, so it's better to break so that callers stop generating
too weak passwords.

to make the difference with other fields more visible

If we rename a script used as external validator, we don't have way of detecting that this script might be used, so add to the "static checks" a check that for every field referencing an external validator, this validator can actually be traversed.

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!1031

Check that script exists.

Like a real-world user.

__ac_name & __ac_password are only useful to get a cookie, so only use them
when the test is actually expecting a cookie.

One inline javascript snippet less.