- 25 Sep, 2020 32 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
This reverts commit 35b2c024.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Allow edition in the new UI
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
This make everything slow as hell and prevent to quickly save.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Example: <h2 class="foo">bar</h2> => <h3 class="foo">bar</h3>
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Changing the language and browsing to another web section require to fully refresh the page.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Catalog seems to correctly handle the OR parameters. Do not lose the possible external `query` parameter.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Test jumping to the same context. Test also direct form rendering configured as jump action.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
This allows getting stable URL which can be used in ERP5JS to highlight the current jump
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This test uses pinDateTime to create an history of test results where tests have been executed in order test suite 1, 2, 3. This is done using this pattern: now = DateTime() ... # do several things that may actually take more than one second self.processTest("test suite 1", "r0=a", node_title="COMP0-Node1") self.pinDateTime(now + 1.0/86400) self.processTest("test suite 2", "r0=a", node_title="COMP1-Node1") self.pinDateTime(now + 2.0/86400) self.processTest("test suite 3", "r0=a", node_title="COMP1-Node1") My guess is that we take "now" too early, and when we add 1 second to this now variable, this may actually be going back in time sometimes, effectively creating test suite 2 before test suite 1. Assign now to current date after doing all the affectTestSuite calls should solve this.
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
Portal Type as Classes: Interaction Workflows methods could be improperly generated because of 58d4ab8e. 1. Add Interaction on _setSourceReference() to `Document Component`. 2. generatePortalTypeClass() is called recursively and an inner `Document Component` Portal Type class is created without any accessor holder. => As __bases__ is (klass, GetAcquireLocalRolesMixIn) since 58d4ab8e but loadClass() was not updated to reflect this, Portal Type Workflow Methods were generated on the inner Portal Type Class where _setSourceReference() is not available and registerWorkflowMethod() creates a WorkflowMethod calling Base._doNothing.
-
- 24 Sep, 2020 5 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
The performance of a module is much less impacted by the number of objects than before, at least for kind of total we have in tests (about 1000 objects)
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Round the amounts line by line when validating transactions balances and showing the totals on an accounting transaction. Even though float field configurations do not allow users to input transactions where amounts uses more digits that what makes sense for the selected currency, we had cases where some transactions generated by custom scripts were "too precise" and passed the validation because unlike in all reports where we display sum of rounded values, the check was only rounding the sum, which cause some transactions with 1.00 on one side and 0.333333 0.333333 and 0.333333 on the other side to be valid. The scripts used to display sums on an accounting transaction had the same problem, they were also showing the rounded sum and not the sum of rounded values.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Always use textwrap.dedent implicitly so that we don't have to do it in every test and disable the way of making multi lines scripts by passing multiple arguments. Now there's only one way to do and every tests use the same way
-
- 23 Sep, 2020 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
getRepositoryList contain all business template repositories, ie: ['/srv/slapgrid/slappart4/srv/slapos/soft/c63ba7265399450b28f9ea6d5667a5e7/parts/erp5-doc/bt5', '/srv/slapgrid/slappart4/srv/slapos/soft/c63ba7265399450b28f9ea6d5667a5e7/parts/erp5/bt5', '/srv/slapgrid/slappart4/srv/slapos/soft/c63ba7265399450b28f9ea6d5667a5e7/parts/erp5/product/ERP5/bootstrap', '/srv/slapgrid/slappart4/srv/slapos/soft/c63ba7265399450b28f9ea6d5667a5e7/parts/erp5-bin/bt5'] it seems in random order. Test was written to use the one from parts/erp5/bt5, but since it just takes "anything which does not contain bootstrap" it was sometimes getting erp5-bin or erp5-doc and could not find erp5_configurator_standard business template. Change the selection of the repository to take into account that we may also have erp5-doc and erp5-bin and so that it fails if more than one.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
all member of random module are available (because in ZopeGuards, there's a random.__allow_access_to_unprotected_subobjects__ = 1), SystemRandom class also is, but Random class was not, even though there should be nothing unsafe in this. This is needed if we want to use a random number generator with a fixed seed to get reproductible results. We could use random.seed module level function but since this is also used by several things in ERP5 this does not produce reproductible sequences.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1265
-