- post reply action creates a new post with "Re:" title and renders the corresponding action dialog form

- things in post list view are still hardcoded, but controller contemplates form lists now

- signature layer for appcachestorage sync changed to memory type
- obsolete post view removed

erp5_discussion: initial commit for discussion tool (WIP)

erp5_officejs: web site and gadgets for discussion tool

erp5_officejs_connector: forms for discussion tool

erp5_post: html post jio view for discussion tool

erp5_officejs_ui_test: unit tests for discussion tool

[HARDCODED] only discussion tool tests

erp5_discussion: adding officejs dependency to install the discussion tool site

testing a fix for migration test in discussion tool

erp5_hal_json_style: hateoas script extended to retrieve raw form definition

erp5_officejs: rendering form on JS side
- hardcoded JSON was removed
- form definition is get from jio storage (erp5 for now)
- rendering is done in controller.js using form definition and context (jio document)

erp5_officejs_connector: changes on HTML post view as jio for discussion tool

erp5_post: changes on html post view for discussion tool

erp5_officejs: store json form definition in indexedDB

erp5_officejs: adding a layer in jio data storage to replicate appcache content

erp5_officejs: bug fix - missing resource in appcache file

WIP: erp5_officejs: replicate appcache content into local storage

erp5_officejs: new file manifest to list form json urls and other configurations
- this prevents the appcache-local storage sync to store unnecessary resources like gadgets

erp5_officejs: replicate appcache content into local storage
- configurations like form definitions are saved as objects into data-storage.metadata to allow jio.get

erp5_officejs: minor fixes and cleanup

erp5_officejs: include non-json resources from appcache as blobs

WIP erp5_officejs: getting rid of editable view for form rendering

erp5_officejs: got rid of editable view form and using gadget_erp5_form directly

erp5_officejs: removing unnecessary redirect

erp5_officejs_ui_test: updating test

erp5_officejs: fix in appcachestorage sync

[HARCODED]  erp5_hal_json_style: remove permission controls to appcache hatoas return-dict

erp5_officejs: removing comments in appcache manifest

erp5_officejs: revert get rid of editable view
- editable view is generic enough for form editing, so it will be kept
- but submit handling is done in controller gadget

erp5_officejs: cleanup in controller html

erp5_officejs: bug fixing on storage migration
- new appcachestorage hash layer is created when new storage is selected

erp5_hal_json_style: missing jio_view action in ERP5 Form portal type
- needed to get the form definition from hateoas script

erp5_officejs: new parameter appcache in hateoas script
- this new parameter disable permission check when hateoas is called by bootloader
- appcache storage sync is canceled if storage requires authentication
- WIP: redirect to login not working

erp5_officejs: extra controls in appcachestorage sync error handling

erp5_officejs: logging more error details for failing unit test

erp5_officejs: more error logging for tests
- attempt to fix test

erp5_officejs: more details in log for test

erp5_officejs: adding configuration manifest explicitly
- even is it committed, test fails due to "can't get manifest"

erp5_officejs: using old appcache manifest instead of the configuration one

erp5_officejs: no need of explicitly commit the configuration manifest or use old manifest
- the test failed the same with both attempts

erp5_officejs_ui_test: add a check for manifest configuration file

erp5_officejs_ui_test: fix in configuration manifest url

erp5_officejs: attempt to fix unit test appcache sync

erp5_officejs_ui_test: cleanup

erp5_officejs: clean up after test fix

erp5_hal_json_style: fix permission issue for appcache storage sync
- new parameter added for this scenario

[HARDCODED] erp5_hal_json_style: forcing value of html post action jio_view

erp5_hal_json_style: error handling in hardcoded action value

[WIP] erp5_officejs: get rid of hardcoded form name in controller gadget
- form name comes from the document portal type action
- for now, path to action is hardcoded. It will come from a allDocs query (not implemented yet in appcachestorage sync)

erp5_hal_json_style: fix test due to hardcode

erp5_officejs: jio_allDocs queries can be done on local data storage after appcachestorage sync

erp5_officejs: missing hateoas urls in appcache and configuration manifests

Removing unnecessary modified files from merge request

erp5_officejs: minor refactoring

erp5_officejs: code cleanup

/bug #20190204-1BF3A5A
https://nexedijs.erp5.net/#/bug_module/20190204-1BF3A5A

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!848

- local_roles: ( Assignee OR Assignor ) AND other_unknown_id: value

    [All criterions (AND)_______ v]
    [-][local_roles_____________ v] -> |Type             |  -.
       [Equal to (at least one)_ v]    |Modification Date|   :
       [Assignee________________  ]    |Title            |   :
       [Assignor________________  ]    |Reference        |   :
       [________________________  ]    |Description      |   : search_column_list
                                       |State            |   :
    [-][other_unknown_id________ v]    |Searchable Text  |   :
       [Equal to________________ v]    |Search Expression|  -'
       [value___________________  ]    |local_roles      |  -.
                                       |other_unknown_id |  -' additional_search_column_list

- the "Equal to (at least one)" operator is displayed in the same listbox as "Equal to" and "Contains" ;
- this filter item can have multiple input value field ;
- one input value field has to be filled (required) like on the other filter items ;
- when extended_search is `title: ( "One" OR "Two" )`, behavior changed :

    ________before________  ______________now______________

         Filter Editor               Filter Editor
    [ At least one (OR) v]  [ All criterions (AND)______ v]
    [-][ Title_________ v]  [-][ Title__________________ v]
       [ Equal to______ v]     [ Equal to (at least one) v]
       [ One___________ x]     [ One____________________ x]
    [-][ Title_________ v]     [ Two____________________ x]
       [ Equal to______ v]     [ _______________________  ]
       [ Two___________ x]  [+]
    [+]

         Search bar                  Search bar
    [One][Two][ _______  ]  [One][Two][ ________________  ]

Activate copy/paste/delete buttons on form list and form view.

When selection listbox lines, only use what is visible / checked.
This is required because of list methods which do not support catalog queries.

This changes the behaviour of mass workflow transition action and delete action,
but at least, it is consistent everywhere now, and so, easier to explain (what you see is what you change).

The listboxes in mass delete / state change dialogs are only used to confirm the lines selection.

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!852

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!850

Introduce a new ERP5Site_resetAccountingTransactionLineGroupingReference
script to reset grouping reference on accounting transaction lines.

This solve a problem with the way we activated on
AccountingTransactionLine_resetGroupingReference the context of the
line, if line was removed from OFS before activity was executed, the
activity was discarded and grouping references on related lines was not
reset.

Also drop the unused `keep_if_valid_group` parameter, it was not making
sense.

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!849

Also, make some existing sanitation happen earlier than before, to store
values in a cleaner format.

default is to run all tests

When there was parallel execution of this alarm with lots of non grouped lines, it can happen that lines are grouped but not indexed yet.

With recent changes in CMFActivity, getServerAddress is now used
when setting up the site, before the ZServer is started, which means:
- getServerAddress memoized a wrong return value;
- the test didn't fail with --load.

The button "Subscribe/Unsubscribe from Timer Service" does not clearly 
explain the fact that it determines whether or not Alarms are enabled in
ERP5. It is very counter-intuitive to see Alarms on "enabled" in the 
"Configure Alarms" screen and yet not have them being run because the
Alarm Node is not subscribed to the Timer Service.

/reviewed-on nexedi/erp5!539