Commit b54e92c7 authored by Łukasz Nowak's avatar Łukasz Nowak

- fix method (it was doing inverted thing)

 - fix test code and simulate previous base code
 - assert that filesystem property sheet is removed, not ZODB one, as
   simulation mode is on


git-svn-id: https://svn.erp5.org/repos/public/erp5/trunk@45162 20353a03-c40f-0410-a6d1-a30d3c3de9de
parent e125de42
......@@ -7442,11 +7442,14 @@ class TestBusinessTemplate(ERP5TypeTestCase, LogInterceptor):
"""
Add Property Sheet to Business Template
"""
sequence['current_bt'].edit(template_property_sheet_id_list=[sequence['ps_title']])
sequence['current_bt'].edit(template_property_sheet_id_list=[])
def test_BusinessTemplateWithDocumentPropertySheetRemoved(self):
"""Checks that if Business Template defines Document and PropertySheet
Document is not removed"""
Document is not removed
This test uses simulation of pre-property sheet migration to have non unique
paths to remove"""
sequence_list = SequenceList()
sequence_string = '\
CreateDocument \
......@@ -7474,7 +7477,7 @@ class TestBusinessTemplate(ERP5TypeTestCase, LogInterceptor):
CheckDocumentExists \
CheckPropertySheetExists \
\
CopyBusinessTemplate \
SimulateAndCopyPrePropertySheetMigrationBusinessTemplate \
Tic \
\
RemovePropertySheetFromBusinessTemplate \
......@@ -7484,7 +7487,7 @@ class TestBusinessTemplate(ERP5TypeTestCase, LogInterceptor):
UseImportBusinessTemplate \
CheckBuiltBuildingState \
CheckNotInstalledInstallationState \
InstallBusinessTemplate \
InstallWithoutForceBusinessTemplate \
Tic \
\
CheckInstalledInstallationState \
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment