An error occurred fetching the project authors.
- 30 Apr, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Ivan Tyagov authored
Make sure erp5-hr can override erp5_base.
-
- 29 Apr, 2013 10 commits
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
This reverts commit 970d1d19, which breaks many unit tests.
-
Mame Coumba Sall authored
-
Mame Coumba Sall authored
-
Mame Coumba Sall authored
Also fix a regression in erp5_web, which was introduced when naming convention test was reapplied.
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
fix lint warning: unexpected end of line; it is ambiguous whether these lines are part of the same statement
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
otherwise installation fails if a business template contains OOo document in PathTemplateItem.
-
Tristan Cavelier authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 26 Apr, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 25 Apr, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
"Location" is also used for redirection, so it cannot be used. Use a similar but non-standard harder instead.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
- 24 Apr, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Ivan Tyagov authored
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
- 23 Apr, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
- 22 Apr, 2013 6 commits
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
Later, we might want to do more processing after loading, or before dumping, accessing private Message data.
-
Julien Muchembled authored
When an object is deleted, higher level code used to flush its messages (without invoking them). However, a concurrent and very long transaction may be about to activate such an object, without conflict. We already experienced false -3 errors that could prevent other messages to be validated. Because there is no efficient and reliable way to flush absolutely all messages, messages on deleted objects are now ignored and deleted without any email notification. There's only a WARNING in logs. But for performance reasons, there's still a flush on object deletion. To simplify code, messages that went to -3 for other reasons, like a non-existing method, now go to -2. In fact, this was already the case for grouped messages. In case that a path is recycled, it may still be possible for a message to be executed on a wrong object (the new one), instead of being ignored (because the activated object was deleted). So in such scenario, developer should make sure not to delete an object that may be activated in a concurrent transaction. If the original object has an OID at the moment it is activated, an assertion will make sure the message is not executed on another object.
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Also add support for own section title and count method. Update configurator accordingly
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 19 Apr, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
add _generatePerDayNodeNumberId id generator that should be more useful than _generatePerNodeNumberId. it allows to reindex 'recently generated documents' that is not possible with _generatePerNodeNumberId.
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
and use 0 for other nodes instead of magic number 111.
-
- 18 Apr, 2013 1 commit
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
Because flush() relies on this method, it becomes also possible to do ob.flushActivity(method_id=('immediateReindexObject', 'recursiveImmediateReindexObject'))
-
- 17 Apr, 2013 3 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
restore ProductionOrder_getConsumptionMovementList, as it is used in ProductionOrder_getOperationFutureInventoryList
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 16 Apr, 2013 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 15 Apr, 2013 9 commits
-
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
They are not supported by erp5_accounting_alternate_catalog
-