-
Peter Xu authored
Patch series "mm/hugetlb: More fixes around uffd-wp vs fork() / RO pins", v2. This patch (of 6): There're a bunch of things that were wrong: - Reading uffd-wp bit from a swap entry should use pte_swp_uffd_wp() rather than huge_pte_uffd_wp(). - When copying over a pte, we should drop uffd-wp bit when !EVENT_FORK (aka, when !userfaultfd_wp(dst_vma)). - When doing early CoW for private hugetlb (e.g. when the parent page was pinned), uffd-wp bit should be properly carried over if necessary. No bug reported probably because most people do not even care about these corner cases, but they are still bugs and can be exposed by the recent unit tests introduced, so fix all of them in one shot. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417195317.898696-1-peterx@redhat.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230417195317.898696-2-peterx@redhat.com Fixes: bc70fbf2 ("mm/hugetlb: handle uffd-wp during fork()") Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: Mika Penttilä <mpenttil@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
5a2f8d22